similar to: [Bug 8838] New: rsync daemon chooses wrong destination place if space and the module name is part of it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8654 Summary: link-by-hash: Fix (non-exploitable) buffer overflow Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8655 Summary: link-by-hash: add 'link by hash dir' to rsyncd.conf Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8266 Summary: fileflags.diff compile fix Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666 Summary: --debug=all9 fail Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact: rsync-qa at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7951 Summary: Option for case insensitivity in filter rules Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All URL: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2007- March/017381.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12430 Bug ID: 12430 Summary: rsync daemon chooses wrong place for pathes containing space and the module name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 Summary: Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7070 Summary: Permission denied message with --fake-super and permissionless directory Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi all, I can't find a working archive search for this list, so please forgive me if this has been discussed before. Has any thought been given to supporting websockets in the ssh client? I'm talking about solely using a websocket as the transport layer, and leaving the actual protocol intact, as opposed to the (to me, frankly terrifying) idea of allowing a web server to act as an ssh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211 Summary: Inconsistency between man page and help Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mluscon at redhat.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9693 Summary: New --time-format option Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mluscon at redhat.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9212 Summary: rsync loses track of files if differing directory prefixes are given Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hi, I'm considering migrating away from gmail for my (one-man) company, and I'm trying to decide if dovecot is the right option (I'm committed to self-hosting). I'm a developer, so happy to do my own tooling if needed. *Is there currently a good webmail interface to dovecot, or work-in progress?* If not, would a web interface be out-of-scope for dovecot? I want to use SAML for

On 03/28/2016 05:05 PM, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi wrote: > >> On March 28, 2016 at 5:43 PM Phil Lello <phil at dunlop-lello.uk> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm considering migrating away from gmail for my (one-man) company, and I'm >> trying to decide if dovecot is the right option (I'm committed to >> self-hosting). I'm a

Hi, I am running openssh7.3p1 on an embedded Linux system and discovered this problem. If I run: ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f testfile it appears to generate the key and I get the output: Generating public/private rsa1 key pair. Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase): Enter same passphrase again: Saving key "testfile" failed: unknown or unsupported key type Should this option

Hello everyone, In --link-dest/--copy-dest/--compare-dest modes, I'd like to distinguish between destination directories that have been completely rsynced and the ones that are only partially synced because of a network failure. In short, I'd like to mimic the behaviour rync has on individual files (building them as .filename-random and then renaming them to filename) for the whole

I am posting again - Please help. I am trying to add print drivers for a samba shared printer to a Windows2000 group - Everything up to this step works - I am using Samba 3.0.1 rpcclient -d 100 -Uroot -c 'adddriver "Windows NT x86" \ E323:LMAAE1DD.dll:\ LMAAE1P1.PPD:LMAAE1DA.DLL:LMAAE1DA.HLP:\ NULL:RAW:LMAA1B1.DLL,LMAAE1BJ.DLL,LMAAE1BT.DLL,LMAAE1DA.ALL,LMAAE1ED.DLL,LMAAE1PI.EXE,\

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10372 Summary: rsync 3.10 error in protocol data stream while rsync 3.0.9 runs through Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hello, Does anybody know how to avoid the file fragmentation when a file is created over NFSv3? A file created locally is OK: dd bs=32k if=/dev/zero of=test count=32x1024 conv=fsync filefrag test test: 10 extents found, perfection would be 9 extents When I create the file in the same dir, but from another machine, mounted over NFS: filefrag test test: 4833 extents found, perfection would be

Hi, We have developed a small RoR app that runs fine on a standard IBM thinkpad (1GB mem) but runsmuch slower when on an IBM x460 Redhat machine (32GB ram). The x460 server has hardly any thing running on it at present, so that not the issue. We are busy checking the config and permissions of the user account used to run the app., but I was wondering if you guys have heard anything about redhat