similar to: scientific notation in a data frame

Hi dear list, If anybody could help me, it would be great! I have two files: File 1 is a list (one column and around 100000 rows) File 2 is a list with all the names from file one and a few more (one column and more than 100000 rows) What I want is to add a column in file 2 that says which name appeared in file 1 and which doesn't (yes and no would work as a code) It's very important to

Hi all, I'd appreciate if anyone can help me with this... I have a data frame that looks like this: 1 + name1 1 2 3 2 + name2 5 9 10 2 - name3 56 74 93 1 - name4 65 75 98 I need to rearrange this in a way so that the rows with "1" in the first column, and "-" in the second column; then columns 4 and 6 should switch places. That is, column 6 would be now column 4 and

Hello, I don't know if the result of acos(0.5) == pi/3 is a bug or not. It looks strange to me. Inaki Murillo

Hi all, I have a package that is specific to a task I was repetitively using a few years ago. I now needed to run it again with new data. However I am told it was built with an older version or R and will not work. How can I tweak the package so it will run on 11.1? It was a one-off product and has not been maintained. Is there a way to "unpackage" it and repackage it to work? I

Dear members, I am performing multivariate analysis on marine benthic populations using R. At first glance I found ca and VEGANO packages to be the suitable for the task, but neither has incorporated Detrended Canonical Correspondence Analysis (DCCA), which is just the method I want to apply on my data. I've looked for alternative packages containing the method, but my suspicion is that

If I knew this, I have forgotten it: Is there a way to force R to forgo use of scientific notation, e.g. to use .000029 instead of 2.9e-05? (Aside from using formatC for example) I run across this every now and then and work around it (multiple values by 100, for example) but cannot find any way to deal with it otherwise. A particularly problematic place it pops up is in axis tick labels.

Hello, Firstly, real new to R here. I have a function intended to evaluate the values in columns spread over many tables. I have an argument in the function that allows the user to input what sequence of tables they want to draw data from. The function seems to work fine, but when the user inputs a single number (over 9) instead of a sequence using the : operator, I find an error message: the

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

Hello, llvm-bcanalyzer told me that the size of the BLOCKINFO_BLOCK of my file is "1.345017e+01" percent of the whole file. This is not very readable. The attached patch prints the percentage without scientific notation so we get something bit more readable: Block ID #0 (BLOCKINFO_BLOCK): Num Instances: 1 Total Size: 637b/79.62B/19W % of file: 13.450169 Num

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: >> Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/ >> Format.h"? > > Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. It looks like something similar got applied back in r82772 on 9/25. > > Btw,

PROBLEM `signif' does change to scientic notation at different levels depending on the number of significant digits in the input. This can generate tables where figures change ``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation. PROPOSAL The change to the scientific notation should be made only if the figure in scientific notation - with potentially as

murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D

L.S. Is the following expected and/or documented? > 1e-2 < "0.05" [1] TRUE > 1e-4 < "0.05" [1] FALSE Many thanks in advance for any pointer. Best, Tobias > sessionInfo() R Under development (unstable) (2013-01-01 r61512) Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 [3]

> On 22 Mar 2019, at 18:07 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > gives (on Linux R 3.5.3, Fedora 28) > > d=10 d=7 d=2 d=1 d=0 > [1,] "123456" "123456" "123456" "1e+05" "%#4.0-1e" > [2,] "12345.6" "12345.6" "12346"

Hi, Would there be a function and/or some options to force R to write a value of say 1.0e-4 as "0.0001"? More specifically I want to use R to write ASCII file(s) for other programs to read and some of these programs don't know how to deal numbers in scientific notation or have a different convention. Thanks in advance. Yves Gauvreau B.E.F.P. Universit? du Qu?bec ? Montr?al cyg at

Hi, I was working on a project for my class and I am trying to make sure the y-axis numbers NEVER convert automatically to scientific notation. Is there anything I can set in the plot function to make sure of this? I know formatC( ) can be used in the axis function, but it seems to give me an error when using it in the plot function. Thanks, student-in-need-of-some-help

Hi I have a data.frame with the following numbers (first column are month numbers) 07,0,0,0,0.315444056314174,0,0,0,12.5827462764176,0.079194498691732, 0.0280828101707015,0,0.0695808222378877 08,0,0,105600,0.393061160316545,0,0,0,8.95551253153947,0.0880023174276553, 0.285714285714286,0,0.0669139911789158 09,0,0,0,0,12.5,0,0,13.5135887094281,0.0557531529154668,0,0, 0.0487526139182026

Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian