similar to: [R-sig-hpc] Debian/Ubuntu + threaded BLAS/ATLAS (solved)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[R-sig-hpc] Debian/Ubuntu + threaded BLAS/ATLAS (solved)"

2012 Oct 13
0
[R-sig-hpc] Debian/Ubuntu + threaded BLAS/ATLAS (solved)
On 15 March 2012 14:09, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek@r-project.org> wrote: > I thought I'll post this here since I could not find an answer anywhere I > searched: how to setup R with threaded BLAS on Debian/Ubuntu. > > First, neither Debian nor Ubuntu come with optimized ATLAS binaries, > simply because by definition they need to be optimized for a particular >
2011 Jan 28
2
R CMD INSTALL cannot find libf77blas
I feel like Marlon Brando in "On the Waterfront" where he's told "It's not your night, kid", except for me it has been the last two months trying to debug memory problems. Now I can't even install an old version of this package on a netbook running the Ubuntu 10.10 netbook remix because it can't find the libraries libf77blas and libatlas. I have even gone to
2008 Aug 29
1
(Current) Ubuntu : r-base-dev seems incompatible with atlas-base-dev.
Emmanuel, On 30 August 2008 at 00:04, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: | Dear list, | | Setup : Ubuntu Hardy + updates + backports + security + R repository on | a 3.2 GHz PIV dual-core processor. | | Bitten (again...) by the "I'll optimize my setup" bug, I tried to test | atlas. Following Dirk's advice on a not-so-recent post to R-help, I | tried "apt-get install -s
2010 Nov 13
1
LAPACK lib problem, lme4, lastest R, Linux
I just dumped Vista off a laptop and installed Ubuntu 10.10 (latest release) as the single operating system. I did all of the updates and then installed emacs and ess. Next I installed R by following the the usual instructions on the CRAN site. At this point all is working I am now in the process of installing the packages that I normally have installed. I am having a problem with the LAPACK
2010 May 28
2
Compiling R-2.11.0 with ATLAS-tuned BLAS and LAPACK
Hello. I am a Linux neophyte and know almost nothing ?about compiling, so I would appreciate any help and advice y'all would care to offer. I am trying to compile the 64 bit version of R using a tuned ATLAS and LAPACK (ATLAS 3.9.24). I am running Ubunto 10.04 LTS (through wubi, FWIW). The ATLAS and LAPACK files (atlas.so, f77blas.so, lapack.so, and cblas.so) are sitting in the folder
2001 Jul 30
3
ATLAS
I thought I would try compiling R this time with the ATLAS libraries. I have compiled ATLAS and I have the following libraries: libatlas.a libf77blas.a libptcblas.a libtstatlas.a libcblas.a liblapack.a libptf77blas.a Is it sufficient to use ' --with-blas=libatlas.a ' when configuring or do I need to specify any of the other libraries as well? -- William D. McCoy
2011 Mar 15
1
Special BLAS and explcit parallel code
Hi I just read the thread on gotoBLAS, as well as the excellent vignette of gcbd. I still have some confusion and would like to ask very basic questions, hope I am not taking too much of your time. The point that retained my attention was the question of using implicit (multi-threaded blas) versus explicit (parallel code) optimisation. As I understood, the ideal would be to use a
2010 Nov 15
0
Problem with lm4 and lapack library
I have R under Linux Kubuntu Hardy Heron 8.04 LTS. I am trying to install package 'lme4' and get the following error: ---- * installing *source* package ?lme4? ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include -I"/usr/lib/R/library/Matrix/include" -I"/usr/lib/R/library/stats/include" -fpic -g -O2 -c init.c -o init.o gcc -std=gnu99
2010 Nov 14
3
LAPACK libraries improperly linked
I am not sure if this is an R development problem or not. I am starting with completely clean OS and and installing the latest version of R without trying to anything special but I am having trouble with the LAPACK library linking when I try to build packages that require them. I thought perhaps my problem may be if interest here. I just dumped Vista off a laptop formatted the disk and
2013 Jun 23
1
stock ubuntu raring binary R 3.0.1 and accelerated blas libraries?
dear debian-R group: I am using the stock ubuntu binary R 3.0.1 for ubuntu raring but on cinnamon mint olivia 15. I read dirk's gcbd paper from a couple of years ago. it suggests that stock blas is pretty bad compared to the four main alternatives. of course, dirk also maintains the binaries for debian/ubuntu R, so he probably knows the answer off hand. I installed libatlas3-base
2023 Dec 30
2
custom built R will not change BLAS/LAPACK with update-alternatives
Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same
2010 Apr 09
2
problems loading blas with R 2.11.0~20100402-1
Hi, Since upgrading to version 2.11.0~20100402-1, starting R fails with: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libblas.so.3gf: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Is this occurring to others on sid? -- Seb
2012 May 09
2
R Installation Manual - ATLAS BLAS guidance that is not in the current version
Good afternoon. I am trying to compile a version of Rblas.dll based on ATLAS for the Corei7. I had remembered that there was mention of which file to adjust and that "xerbla" needed to be removed from one of the outputs from the last time I tried a few years ago. The most recent version of the R Installation manual does not say anything about this. An older version (2.10 I believe) has
2000 Feb 09
1
forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Dirk's mail to r-devel bounced because of his peculiar return address. He asked me to forward this for him. P.S. I have tried building R with atlas2 on a Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 system but I have not yet managed to out-fox the configure script to get it to use the desired shared object library. -- Douglas Bates bates@stat.wisc.edu Statistics Department
2005 Feb 23
1
BLAS or ATLAS?
I believe that actually means configure was able to use the BLAS you specified (MKL in this case). You can scan through config.log to make sure. Andy > From: > > Fedora Core 3 > > I installed the Intel MLk, > > and tried : --with-blas="-lmkl -lguide -lpthread" > > and got : External libraries: readline, BLAS(generic) > > thus I'm
2010 Jun 02
2
R and multi cpu ATLAS
Dirk suggested I move this thread over here. I am trying to get a multithreaded (multi CPU) version of ATLAS working with R, and have been unable, thus far, to get it working. Has anyone gotten an multithreaded version of ATLAS working on Debian (64 bit)? I've tried this: apt-get source atlas -t unstable cd atlas-3.8.3 DEFAULTS=n fakeroot debian/rules custom but it is APPEARING to only
2010 Jun 02
0
R-SIG-Debian Digest, Vol 58, Issue 3
food now? or after work in the library? On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:00 +0200, r-sig-debian-request at r-project.org wrote: > Send R-SIG-Debian mailing list submissions to > r-sig-debian at r-project.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
2007 Sep 11
2
building with atlas version of blas and lapack
I'd like to build R using my optimized blas and lapack libraries. It seems know matter what I do, the configure script uses the blas supplied with the source. My blas and lapack libraries are in /usr/local/atlas/lib. How can I get configure to use these? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Aug 29
1
BLAS and ATLAS
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:48:23AM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, G?ran Brostr?m wrote: > >LAPACK/BLAS routines call xerbla "if an input parameter has an > >invalid value" (exact quote from XERBLA at Netlib). Other types of errors > >are not printed (by xerbla), but it is up to the user to check the return > >value of the argument
2002 Jul 15
1
R1.5.1 compilation ans install: 2 previous questions
I'm geting ready to compile and install R-1.5.1 (R-patched_2002-07-15.tar.gz) on Linux (Suse 8.0, 2 AMD proc., ATLAS libs installed). My current version is R.1.4.0 I'd like to get advice on two doubts: 1. Is it better that I remove my current /usr/lib/R directory? 2. Regarding ATLAS, the R-1.5.1 R-admin manual states : "This is currently not supported. The problem is that SIGINT