similar to: Extracting mbox format from Dovecot IMAP (mdbox)

On trying a yum update I get the following error: Error: kernel conflicts with bfa-firmware yum suggests I work around the problem with --skip-broken or try running 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest' Is there an accepted process for resolving this? -- Regards, Giles Coochey, CCNP, CCNA, CCNAS NetSecSpec Ltd +44 (0) 7983 877438 http://www.coochey.net http://www.netsecspec.co.uk giles at

Hi, I have a Centos 5 system with sendmail running as my MTA. Normally I note from sendmail logs that mails get delivered using the 'local' mailer. I have therefore entered the following into my sendmail.mc file, from an earlier post on this list: define(`LOCAL_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver') define(`LOCAL_MAILER_FLAGS',`DFMPhfnu9')

Just a note that I did a little work to extend FreePBX distro with some extra Fail2Ban which deals with some drive-by SIP registration attempts. My regex is poor to middling, but the steps detailed here: http://www.coochey.net/?p=61 manage to stop IPs which try to authenticate against Asterisk which FreePBX were not able to stop before. I would welcome any improvements anyone would care to

Hi List, I''m in the process of setting up softflowd 0.9.9 on a Centos 6.4 system (compiled from source tarball). The daemon will listen to an unused interface that is receiving port mirrored traffic (a.la. Span port) I am planning on using the softflowd init script and sysconfig file provided in the tar ball. Do I need to manually put the unused interface into promiscuous mode, or

Someone on this list uses the address @sedwards.com I doubt this is their actual email address as there is no MX record for sedwards.com and I can't find registration for their domain either. Part of my mail servers reject these emails because they cannot be replied to, or are likely to be spam. Every so often I get a mail from the list management to say that I've been unsubscribed

Every so often recently I've seen the load on my heavily under-used dovecot server (1 mailbox) rise up to 1 A top shows imap-login to causing the issue. I have checked /var/log/secure, /var/log/maillog, /var/log/messages and cannot see anything unusual. Anybody else seen something like this? # 2.2.5: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release

On 05/01/2015 15:14, Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE wrote: > Happy new year ! > > We have a SuperMicro server with a LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i controller. > > Since Centos 6.6 update (kernel 2.6.32-504), the controller doesn't > initialize at boot. Reverting to kernel 2.6.32-431 allows server to > boot fine. > I have a similar system, and don't have your problem: #

Hi, though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot? The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook seems to be twice as slow in transferring information across?? # dovecot -n # 2.1.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE

On 08/03/17 10:15, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their >> network >> "managed" by Networkmanager. > > You're opting to have your network managed by a bunch of unloved legacy > scripts that you're advised to avoid using unless necessary, or

Hi. I have two internet connections, the ADSL2+ is very very cheap (but fast 10mb) and I want to use the SHDSL (2mb) only for mail,ssh,http OUT and the ADSL2+ only for surfing. I all works fine if people specify the proxy in the browser, but in case like flash it of no use. Further if I can make the 80/443 traffic go through the proxy only, its an added bonus. If this can be done, fine. Bue I

Guys. I have this problem for a long time. In large number of times when I type letter "y", like in "you" my typing cursor jumps 2-3 rows up or 1-2 words to the left. I am unable to understand why. Could it be something with lap-top keyboard? Typing rate? CentOS 5.5 Gnome, I mostly use Firefox and Thunderbird. Ljubomir

On 08/03/17 10:52, John Hodrien wrote: > > It means you're stuck in your own hand crafted niche. Which is fine, > but it's > up to you to maintain the niche, or you find yourself using obsolete > tools > like ifconfig and route. > > I'd argue there's a gulf between keeping things simple and doing > things your > own way. > I'm sure there are

> The recommended configuration for EL7 is to use NetworkManager unless > you have a very specific edge case preventing you from doing so: > The truth is a lot of us run servers that don't need to have their network "managed" by Networkmanager. We just need to set an IP address, subnet mask, gateway, and DNS servers and we will never be changing that configuration ever

Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on

Hi, I hope someone can help me, I cannot seem to get a system's ethernet interface to correctly work in promiscuous mode... I have a Centos 6.4 system with 2 bnx2 interfaces on it. I have set up eth1 in promiscuous mode and am sending traffic to it using the port mirroring configuration on a Nortel 3510-24T switch. The switch reports that it is sending a fair amount of traffic to the

Hi, My server is connected to the lan and when I run tcpdump I see few packets captured but lots packets received by filter. How can I dump every packets received by filter ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110114/f48ad182/attachment-0002.html>

On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > > Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's

El vie., 20 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 06:16, Giles Coochey (giles at coochey.net) escribi?: > I have a similar set up to you, and just did the upgrade to 1908, I > didn't experience the problem you had, I can't see anything out of the > ordinary in your network files. > I have reviewed the configuration several times now, and still can't see if there's anything wrong

On 08/03/17 14:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > If you'd like a really simple solution that avoids NetworkManager, I > suggest using systemd-networkd (both systemd-networkd and > systemd-resolved packages required). I've used it to set up a bridge > on my workstattion for use with libvirtd/kvm, and it is just as simple > a text file but future compatible. Heck, it

Hi all, Does anyone know of a Linux rescue CD with driver for a SLI MegaRAID 8708? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532