similar to: Difference between 'cr' and ' fasttrack'

A quick question on the fasttrack repo which is now up to date with upstream. Why is the fasttrack repo not in the main CentOS-Base.repo file but contrib which has never had anything is included in the main CentOS-Base.repo file? The goal of CentOS is to be binary-compatible with upstream so fasttrack is "more important" in this regard than contrib. Upsteam ships with the main channels

CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16

The upstream provider has started a new channel called fastrack. It is detailed here (see the whole thread): https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-April/msg00001.html CentOS will also build the fastrack SRPMS. We have created separate repositories in CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 called fasttrack. (I know the spelling is different, that is by design. We don't want to use the name of

> I will change the instructions on the wiki to say to edit the files > that are included in the centos-release rpm. Thanks, Johnny. That's not really my problem. My problem is that I now need to track an additional channel for updates, with associated local mirror and scripting. I was only vaguely aware of it until I was looking for an update I know I saw in the announce digest

Unless I'm mistaken, does it look like Centos 4.7 is missing an update released on December 3rd 2008? Upstream details :- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0989.html An updated tmpwatch package that fixes various bugs is now available. The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified directories and removes files which have not been accessed in a specified period of time.

What is the best way to get the RPM described in the following URL installed on CentOS 5.2: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0586.html I have users who can't run cron jobs because their home directories are NFS mounted, and I believe installing this RPM would fix the problem. I remember reading that the CentOS developers are working on supporting the RHEL FasTrack

I don't know if it's useful to report this: (& who should I report it to?) # yum update [...] * base: mirrors.ircam.fr * extras: mirrors.ircam.fr * fasttrack: mirror.ovh.net * remi-ff: rpms.famillecollet.com * updates: centosq3.centos.org base | 3.7 kB 00:00 cr | 2.9 kB 00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00 fasttrack | 3.4 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml

There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the "php53" package is now necessary for the "drupal6" EPEL components, due to the long out of date PHP 5.1 in the default upstream vendor's codebase. I see that some of these components are

Hi, where I can find former file centos/4/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo? Thanks, David

Greetings, Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo? Thanks. Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:29:52 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update CentOS Errata and

These seems to me to be the first message in the series and provides a really good summary of the changes at Red Hat which seem to be making life a lot more difficult for CentOS. Just figured I'd pull it out of that thread and change the subject line. Below Johnny's email I've copied another from the original thread, written by Lamar Owen, which gives some good explanation on how Red

Hello, when will this upstream update be available? http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0079.html -- Heiko Adams <heiko.adams at gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL:

Just an FYI; hopefully someone who knows will be able to fix :-) http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories says CentOS-Fasttrack - This repository contains bugfix and enhancement updates, issued from time to time, between update sets that may be rolled into the next update set. See this Readme file for more details. This repository has a config file located here for

The permissions are apparently set incorrectly on the vnc SRPM in the FastTrack repo on mirror; I get "permission denied" when I try to mirror it. Thanks. Josh Kelley

Dear all, will there be a fastrack channel for C5? What are the problems inventing one? Thx Rainer

Hello, The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack paragraph at http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories all refer to non existent pages/files at mirror.centos.org. Where can one find the repo files and readme? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Guys, Is there a difference between CentOS 6.0 and centos 6 on the mirror list? Each mirror seems to have a folder for 6.0 and 6 separately. http://mirrors.lga7.us.voxel.net/centos/

Hello, I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is : [ivan at algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1 while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update:

Hi All; I have a laptop running the "workstation" version of Linux from RedHat. I've enabled the EPEL and rpmfusion repos plus I'm subscribed to the following channels: * Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64) * Red Hat Network Tools for RHEL Client (v.5 64-bit x86_64) * RHEL Desktop Supplementary (v. 5 for 64-bit x86_64) * RHEL Desktop

Am 05.04.2017 um 15:02 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS Linux > 6.9 and install media for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. Release Notes > for 6.9 are available at: > > http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.9 > > CentOS Linux 6.9 is derived from source code released by Red