similar to: DC Universe Online not working with new nvidia drivers

Has anyone had any luck running DC Universe Online on wine? I'm having problems booting the station launcher: Distro: Ubuntu 10.04 Wine: Latest Stable from repo Stack output Code: C:\program files\steam\steamapps\common\dc universe online>Registration.url File not found Install script executed.err:ole:RevokeDragDrop invalid hwnd (nil) err:ole:RevokeDragDrop invalid hwnd 0x7011a

The following construct is an ActiveSupport-ism: returning(Foo.new) do |foo| ... end I don''t especially like it, since it''s both more verbose and less efficient than the direct alternative: foo = Foo.new ... foo It doesn''t occur many times in Merb, so does anyone agree with me that it should be removed? I tried doing this (patch attached) and I find

Hi all, Here''s my initial stab at a pure Ruby win32-thread library that doesn''t work at all. I''m not sure how to pass the start address of the arguments to the callback. I thought about Marshal, but you can''t marshal a proc. BTW, the CreateThread method in windows-pr needs to be updated for this to have any hope of success. Any ideas? Thanks, Dan #

Hello, I know this came up before hand, but I haven''t seen a conclusive answer. This is with regards to the MultiparameterAssignmentErrors and select_date when submitting an invalid date (September 31st for example). It seems that when an invalid date is submitted, the date value should be set to nil as opposed to throw an exception that seems a bit hard to catch elegantly and then

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:17:52 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > The original intent of the virtio header relicensing > from 2008 was to make sure anyone can implement compatible > devices/drivers. The virtio-ccw was omitted by mistake. > > We have an ack from the only contributor as well as the > maintainer from IBM, so it's not too late

Hi, I'm using IR and MCJIT to compile a script language. I debug it with on the fly generated .pdb files. During debugging, almost each time I step into a function, I loose information about calling function inside the visual studio callstack view or I have a bunch of pure addresses in the callstack in between the current function and the calling function, for example :

I used generate/scaffold to create simple CRUD screen that works perfectly with Webrick. I wanted to attempt to run the same ROR app on Apache. I followed the instructions found at http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/Fast+CGI+and+Apache2+for+Windows+XP with the alternate ending found at http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/Fast+CGI+and+Apache2+for+Windows+wit hout+VirtualHosts. I have

I've always just hacked support for this in to the various JITs (for JuliaLang, in our debuginfo.cpp file), by setting the no-frame-pointer-optim flag in the IR, then creating and populating a dummy unwind description object in the .text section, and registering that dynamically. Some day I hope to actually just register the .pdata/.xdata sections with the unwinder. PDBs are a bit different

I am having a problem. I am trying to work through the PDF of Dave Thomas''s book, but I keep getting this error after developing for five to ten minutes: WARNING: You have a nil object when you probably didn''t expect it! Odds are you want an instance of Array instead. Look in the callstack to see where you''re working with an object that could be nil. Investigate

Hi I noticed a crash issue when I passed the following values: celt_mode_create(96000, 258, &e); CELTMode->mdct.kfft[0] is not initialized after calling?clt_mdct_init() and when?celt_mode_destroy() is called it tries to dereference this value in kiss_fft_free(). -- Bjoern Here's the callstack: !kiss_fft_free(const kiss_fft_state * cfg=0x00000000) ?Line 650 + 0x3 bytes

This language has functions that will have to be tail-called due to having the ability to 'pause' its callstack, but some functions will not and I was just planning to call them like normal functions. I am wondering, would it be 'faster' (at execution of the compiled code) to just put everything in the tail-call way, or is it still faster to call functions like normal when I can?

I''m using rails 1.8 and login generator 1.1. I''m using rails to manage the contents of my website. I decided to put an admin page for the content management. For the sake of convenience, I used Login Generator. Now when I go to edit or create new content (for now, just posts), it gives me the following error (this one is for new posts): NoMethodError in Goblin#new Showing

Hello all, I am playing around, trying to get an OggVorbis encoder implementation working on the Symbian OS. Unfortunately I am getting a crash - here is the stack vorbis_analysis_blockout _ve_envelope_search _ve_amp mdct_forward free User::Free(void *) RHeap::Free(void *) RHeap::GetAddress(const void *)const RHeap::CheckCell(const RHeap::SCell *)const Panic(TCdtPanic)

Hello all, I am playing around, trying to get an OggVorbis encoder implementation working on the Symbian OS. Unfortunately I am getting a crash - here is the stack vorbis_analysis_blockout _ve_envelope_search _ve_amp mdct_forward free User::Free(void *) RHeap::Free(void *) RHeap::GetAddress(const void *)const RHeap::CheckCell(const RHeap::SCell *)const Panic(TCdtPanic)

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan D. Turner <jonathan.d.turner at gmail.com> wrote: > I saw this was mentioned briefly last year, but there seemed to be > some confusion as to what coroutines entailed and the thread died out. >  This technique has an unfortunate number of names, but it does get a > lot of use, including popular languages like Ruby. > > I'm

Please reference the prior RFC on EfficiencySanitizer. This is one of the performance analysis tools we would like to build under the EfficiencySanitizer umbrella. ==================== Motivation ==================== An application is running sub-optimally if only part of the data brought into the cache is used, which we call cache fragmentation. Knowing the cache fragmentation information

> > Should we just make it a normal target? > My only remaining reservation here - the generic DebugInfo tests, which presumably due to an unimplemented 16-bit branch somewhere deep in the llvm-objdump callstack. The AVR backend passes virtually all of the LLVM test suite but these when avr-unknown-unknown is set as the default target. It feels like the inclusion of ~80 XFAILs for these

Hello everybody, I have sucessfully compiled LLVM with CMAKE generator "Visual Studio 9 2008 Win64" (OS Windows 7). -But when I run the Fibonacci example program in "release" mode, I get a crash with this visual studio popup message : Microsoft Visual Studio C Runtime Library has detected a fatal error in Fibonacci.exe. -Here is the visual studio output:

I have this code, which works fine on MacOS and Linux hosts: const char *target_specific_cpu_args; const char *target_specific_features; if (g->is_native_target) { target_specific_cpu_args = ZigLLVMGetHostCPUName(); target_specific_features = ZigLLVMGetNativeFeatures(); } else { target_specific_cpu_args = ""; target_specific_features =

FYI, I have confirmed it works on VS10SP1 with x64|Release. E:\llvm\build\cmake-x64-vs10>bin\Release\Fibonacci.exe 24 verifying... OK We just constructed this LLVM module: --------- ; ModuleID = 'test' (snip) --------- starting fibonacci(24) with JIT... Result: 46368 ...Takumi 2011/8/11 <gleizesd at gmail.com>: > Hello everybody, > > I have sucessfully compiled LLVM