similar to: Dovecot 2.0.18 build error with pigeonhole

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

Hi, I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification. The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers. For example: STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 STARTTLS=server, relay=acsinet12.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.42], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL,

Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? --Frank Elsner

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

Where on the CentOS website does one find the CentOS-6 CR repo install package? I can find the one for CentOS-5 but not for 6. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:31:25PM +0900, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 12 Sep 2015, at 04:45, Bradley Giesbrecht <pixilla at macports.org> wrote: > > > > Is the Dovecot Object Storage plugin still available for purchase? > > > > It's available, but at least for now we're only selling it to big customers. Well how big? Would a univeristy with 25.000 users

Hi, I have > 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on HP EVA. I always wanted to make some mesurements about several influences to the performance (switch to ext4, switch to mdbox), but I never had enough time to do that. At the moment I *need* more speed, we have too much waitI/O on the system and I already used all other performance and tuning-tricks (separated cache,

On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 18:56 +0000, Michael Stevens wrote: > Hi. > > I'm running 1.0alpha5 on FreeBSD 5.3. I'm using mbox mailboxes. > > I keep getting: > > Jan 8 18:53:12 saigo dovecot: imap(mstevens): file > mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion > failed: (start_pos < data_size) > Jan 8 18:53:13 saigo dovecot: child

Hi all, today I have compiled Dovecot-2.0.18 with Dovecot-Pigeonwhole-0.2.6. Now I have following Problem with sieve: ------------------------%<--------------------------------------------- main_script: line 249: error: included personal script 'vacation.sieve' does not exist. main_script: error: validation failed.

The problem we are facing is incorrect authentications being caught by firewall rules and IP?s getting blocked. We would like to be able to identify the problem account to help the domain admin track down the issue. Does anyone have another idea? We use sql user db so I thought of logging all login attempts to a table with timestamps and lookup the failed logins by timestamp. Regards, Bradley

dovecot 2.2.22 postfix 3.1.1 I?m seeing "SASL NTLM authentication failed: {long_hash}? in mail.log. Is there a way to log the SASL username? I think postfix is logging what Dovecot SASL is returning so I hope I am asking on the right list. Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)

In fact, looking again, dovecot should log the failure with username, if available. Aki On 24.05.2017 09:22, Aki Tuomi wrote: > As band-aid you could try looking at the SASL message, if you decode64 > it might contain the username in plain text. > > Aki > > > On 23.05.2017 17:44, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> The problem we are facing is incorrect authentications being

Hi, We are currently testing Dovecot 2.0.13 with mdbox. If I delete large objects with refcount=0 the index is not updated apparently. Here's an example: [root at mail-004 storage]# ls -l total 194776 -rw------- 1 vmail vmail 482960 Jul 9 14:58 dovecot.map.index -rw------- 1 vmail vmail 4584 Jul 9 16:06 dovecot.map.index.log -rw------- 1 vmail vmail 32856 Jul 9 14:50

Hello. I am new to this forum. If this issue has been discussed already, please inform me, but my STFW have indicated that it has not. If SS7 were available on * would it make commercial sense to use it? There are case studies on the web (courtesy of the Death Star :->) for ISPs with 10,000+ subscriber lines showing clear cost savings in transitioning from PRI to SS7 controlled IMT. My

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc4.tar.gz.sig I'm planning to release rc5 maybe this Friday or weekend, and if there are no serious bugs just change the version number to v2.0.0 a day or two later. Largest changes since rc3: + director: Added director_doveadm_port for accepting doveadm TCP connections. +

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc4.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/rc/dovecot-2.0.rc4.tar.gz.sig I'm planning to release rc5 maybe this Friday or weekend, and if there are no serious bugs just change the version number to v2.0.0 a day or two later. Largest changes since rc3: + director: Added director_doveadm_port for accepting doveadm TCP connections. +

Peter, I was about to post the below to the rsync mailing list, but wondered whether your code which captures rsync output may have allowed rsync to continue past what I think would normally be a fatal error? Thanks Rob. P.S. Should I put the final backups of the old pearcey /home back into their correct slots - 5 backups were recycled, but nothing was added to them? The .Snapshots area is

Hi On april 17th, I upgraded from dovecot 2.1.13 to 2.2.0. Since that time, I had two different users that reported received three incident of messages that disapeared from their mailboxes. The mailbox format is mbox on local FFS filesystem (no NFS), and I use filesystem quotas (but both users are far from filling their quotas). When the message disapeared, it was always a whole rand of dates.

Is the Dovecot Object Storage plugin still available for purchase? Clicking the store link [2] from this page [1] does not show any info about purchasing the plugin. [1] http://www.dovecot.fi/dovecot-object-storage-plugins-available-for-online-purchase/ [2] http://shop.dovecot.fi/ Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)