similar to: Wine versioning

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm now going to make the stub patches that Daniel requested. Added llvm/Support/COFF.h and merged in COFF constants from llvm/MC/MCSectionCOFF.h. Zeroth patch is done. http://github.com/Bigcheese/llvm-mirror/commit/2d88aa08a072bb5f8d687b67d1476f23d37a87d4 A svn-style patch against svn HEAD is

I'm interfacing to C code that uses 1-based indexing on arrays -- it ignores the zeroth element. Thus, input vectors from R must be moved up one, and output arrays must be moved down one. What is the best way to deal with this using R internal code? My current approach is: For an input R vector of length n, allocate a new vector(v) of length n+1 and copy input into v[1] to v[1+n]. Call

Personal background: Much of my experience is with C on Linux (from 1994). I can read Assembly, however, not write it well (I have had formal training in Assembly on the I386, however, never used it). The system: An AMD 586 embedded system with AM29F040 Chip(s) on board. These two flash chips make up the BIOS and the primary storage. The system was designed and built for use with Caldera

Ram: Let me explain and hopefully Reid or Chris will correct if I have it wrong. The first 0 is the index into a possible array of sbyte[13] arrays that this pointer points to. I expect GetElementPtr works this way is to keep down the proliferation of arrays of arrays in the type table. So you are pointing at the zeroth, and in this case only, array of sbyte[13]. The next 0 actually

I'm still working on the next patch, it's going somewhat slowly. I wanted to create a unit test that actually created a union, and in order to do that I had to implement constant unions. And rather than creating a special syntax for constructing a union, I decided that it was simplest to implement the insertvalue instruction for a constant union expression: @foo = constant union {

On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 14:35 -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 02:17:22PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > > I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part > > of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page > > should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page > > sequence number 0,

I just finished the initial split up of WinCOFF.h into llvm/Support/COFF.h and lib/MC/WinCOFFObjectWriter.cpp. This includes almost the minimum changes required to split them up. WinCOFFObjectWriter now needs some refactoring to make things more consistent and less verbose. There also seem to be quite a few memory leaks that need to be resolved.

Hi I need to install wine 1.3.35 because the .36 and .37 have a regrecion with voovly. How can I do that?

I'm having trouble getting Samba working on Solaris 10 with a large active directory (35000 users, 5000 groups). I've set this up successfully in the past with winbind enum users = yes and winbind enum users = yes in the smb.conf file. Owing to the large number of users in this application, I need to have these set to no. Realistically, only a couple dozen people and 3 groups actually

I'm confused by this: > > ... then you need to reset your bisect and use that "Release x.x.xx" as your first good bisect (wine-x.x.xx). This particular bisect output is just a version tag, meaning that no real code was changed (and so cannot have made your problem appear). All the "good" bisects you've set tells GIT that all that code is good, until wine-x.x.xx

Michael makes a great point about aliasing here and different indexing that accesses the same element! Another note: x = A[0][2] is fundamentally different depending on the type of `A`. If e.g. A was declared: int A[10][20], there's only _one_ load. A is a (and is treated as) a linear buffer, and GEPs only pinpoint the specific position of A[0][2] in this buffer (i.e. 0*10 + 2). But if A was

(Sending again after subscribing, I guess the moderator is on vacation.) I'm working on support for tagging Speex files for Mutagen[0] and part of the specification at [1] is confusing me. It says the first page should have granulepos 0 and packetno 0. Does this really mean page sequence number 0, since the Ogg format doesn't number packets? If it doesn't mean page sequence number,

I am trying to understand the hello word assember example. This is my version: %str1 = internal constant [13 x sbyte] c"Hello World\0a\00" declare int %printf(sbyte*, ...) implementation ; Functions: int %main() { %str2 = getelementptr [13 x sbyte]* %str1, long 0, long 0 call int(sbyte*, ...) *%printf(sbyte* %str2) ret int 0 } Why is getelementptr being given two "long

Hi, I noticed the earlier thread on this started by Scott Koranda (sorry - was reading off gmane so I can''t reply to thread) I have exactly the same symptoms: machine hangs as soon as I attempt to start a single domU, just after emitting "using config file..." At that point the machine appears completely wedged. The sequence of 3 ^A on the console no longer does

Hello Tim and others, Thanks for your help explaining this process on IRC. I wrote out a first draft in the RFC xml format. I have attached the xml (labeled as xml.txt so it will appear inline) and the rendered txt files. Please let me know where I can make improvements. I will upload this draft to the IETF datatracker and send it out to codec@ after addressing your comments. -------------- next

Hi all, I'm having problems trying to configure samba with the lastest source. The command I'm using is env CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/kerberos/include -I/usr/local/ldap/include" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/kerberos/lib -L/usr/local/ldap/lib" ./configure --with-ads --with-ldap --with-kerberos=/usr/local/kerberos --with-pam --with-winbind and the error is checking whether to

Hi all, After having spend 2 days to resolve my problem to configure Samba 3.0 (the path to the libgcc_s was wrong) I've finally installed it and I'm trying to join the W2K AD domain with the command: 1. kinit admin@OUR.DOMAIN.ORG (asking password and getting the ticket from the W2K) 2. net ads join -Uadmin@OUR.DOMAIN.ORG (doesn't work) error message : [2003/02/06 15:09:02, 0]

I'm trying to get Warcraft 3: The Frozen Throne or Reign of Chaos to work in wine version 1.3.35 on Gentoo x86_64 kernel 3.0.6 (oss USE flag is included). However, although installation of both games went smoothly, no matter which one I use, I get this error when I attempt to play: ($GAME) was unable to detect a disc in your CD-ROM drive. Please make sure your ($GAME) disc is in your CD-ROM

Hello, I don''t know what the Rails multidimensional array structure is and I am having a problem in this regard. Basically we have a set of games and in a XMLFEEDS table we have basic information about the games (the game date, the sport type of the game). Then in the PARTS table, we have two entries per xmlfeed entry which correspond to the two teams participating in the game.

Dear community, We, a team at IIT Hyderabad are developing an LLVM front end for a networking language called P4 (https://p4.org/). Our work aims to enable LLVM based optimizations for P4. As the P4 language was designed to target many different switch architectures, we feel that P4 can comfortably fit in the LLVM framework where adding targets is more structured. The existing open-source P4