similar to: randomForest: proximity for new objects using an existing rf

Lucene has a syntax "foo bar"~10 for finding foo within 10 words of bar. Does ferret support this feature? (the ~ is used for fuzzy queries) Does rdig? This could be a deal breaker for me ''cos I really need proximity searches -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello there, How to get the proximity matrix of new data in party package? Thanks. Joseph [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I'd like to know how we can choose the distance between two words that we search in a text. I know there is an "op_near" operator but I don't know how I can specified that the number of words between the two specified words should not exceed 10 or 20 or x words. I'm really sorry for my terrible English, I hope I'm understandable!

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the Motorola Q has its Bluetooth always on like the IPhone? I want to use the Motorola Q in a Proximity Detection setup like that described on nerdvittles.com. I know the Treo 650 does not work well since the display must be on for the bluetooth to be on and this eats power. Thanks Chuck Bunn

Greetings R Users! I am posting to inquire about the proximity matrix in the randomForest R-package. I am having difficulty pushing very large data through the algorithm and it appears to hang on the building of the prox matrix. I have read on Dr. Breiman's website that in the original code a choice can be made between using an N x N matrix OR to increase the ability to compute large

Good Day, I'm using the randomForest package to perform a classification. If I supply weights to the optional classwt argument are proximity values computed as a weighted average? I understand that the forest will possibly change as a function of the particular weights I supply. Thanks in advance. Mike Michael Fugate Los Alamos National Laboratory Mail Stop MS-F600, Los Alamos, NM

Dear R-helpers, I'm working on mass spectra in randomForest/R, and following the recommendations for the case of noisy variables, I don't want to use the default mtry (sqrt of nvariables), but I'm not sure up to which proportion mtry/nvariables it makes sense to increase mtry without "overtuning" RF. Let me tell my example: I have 106 spectra belonging to 4 classes, the

Hi, I was reading an article recently about how google ranks results (among many other things of course) based on the proximity of the search terms in the source documents. In addition, the position of the search terms in the search query string itself is also taken into consideration when determining how important each term is. Does Xapian do something similar - at least for the first part?

I''m in a dilemma: In order to keep GET requests from deleting objects, I''d like to use the button_to helper to get "something" that generates a POST request. Unfortunately, that something is a form and forms can''t be nested. I''d also like to place buttons related to the same form close to each other. At the top are some navigational buttons

Hello list friends, I got the following error during yum update. How should I proceed to eliminate the probelm? (I thought perhaps to uninstall the .i386 package -- but there are some 15-20 other packages depending on it...) Repositories: dries, kbs-CentOS-Extras, update, rpmforge, base, addons, extras FWIW: the protectbase plugin was added on 2006-07-10. Thanks in advance, Itay

Guys, I'm migrating an internal Mediawiki over to a new CentOS 4 system. The old server's running FC3 and has a tarball install, ideally I want to stick to properly packaged software as far as possible. [wmcdonald at willspc ~]$ yum deplist mediawiki Finding dependencies: Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files package: mediawiki.i386 1.4.7-1.2.el4.rf

I'm getting the following dependency problem. Please advise how to resolve. Running 5.5 with latest kernel and all updates. Tried getting this one to update and can't - what am I missing? 18:02:57 : Packages to update 18:02:57 : ---> libcaca-0.99-0.1.beta17.el5.rf.i386 18:02:57 : Preparing for install/remove/update 18:02:57 : --> Preparing for a full update 18:02:57 : -->

Once upon a time, m.roth at 5-cent.us <m.roth at 5-cent.us> said: > Excerpt: > Running rm -rf / on any UEFI Linux distribution can potentially > perma-brick your system. Did someone think running "rm -rf /" is a good idea? > Ok, *now* tell me why we shouldn't hate systemd? This has zero to do with systemd. This is a by-product of how the kernel driver and

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:44:48 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: > Did someone think running "rm -rf /" is a good idea? Quote from one of the people who commented on that article: QUOTE: You have this in a script: rm -rf "${DIRECTORY}"/ Now, you have a bug in the script and ${DIRECTORY} is not initialized. You then get rm -rf / executed. One should always ensure that DIRECTORY is

On Mon, February 1, 2016 1:33 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Excerpt: > Running rm -rf / on any UEFI Linux distribution can potentially > perma-brick your system. Yes, I kind of like "rm -rf /". If my memory doesn't fail me, long ago it was one of the tricky questions in sysadmin exam (not that anymore if I read what you, Michael, write further correctly...). Anyway,

wait. would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a tempest in a teapot so to speak. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

John R Pierce wrote: > wait. would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI > memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but > deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a > tempest in a teapot so to speak. It's going to get /boot. And under there, it'll get /boot/EFI. mark

On 2/1/2016 2:07 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: >> >wait. would deleting the inode/sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI >> >memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but >> >deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a >> >tempest in a teapot so to speak. > It's

On 02/01/2016 01:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? Yes. That is how the UEFI management interface works.

On Mon, February 1, 2016 4:24 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/01/2016 01:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? > > Yes. That is how the UEFI management interface works. Will doing rm -rf / actually delete anything in /sys? IMHO, not. The above command first will get to removing /dev, and it will delete /dev/sda1 or