similar to: Director questions

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John Chambers <jmc at r-project.org> wrote: > The Wikipedia statement may be a bit misleading. > > S was never open source. Source versions would only have been available with a nondisclosure agreement, and relatively few copies would have been distributed in source. There was a small but valuable "beta test" network, mainly university

Hi, I just spent a couple of unnerving hours trying to make Dropbox work on CentOS 6.6. Is there a way that 1. Actually works? 2. Doesn't include jumping through burning loops? Cheers from the sunny south of France, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at

Hello. I recently installed Rails on Gentoo, and did a "rails /var/www/localhost/htdocs/parallel_bible/" just to test. Everything *seemed* to work fine, but when I clicked on the "View your Application''s Environment" link, this happens (screenshot attached): http://thegoban.com/rorerror.png Any ideas? Is this normal? I know it''s not actually stopping me

FYI It works for me on Centos 7 when I used it last week. On 11 December 2014 at 09:04, Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Niki Kovacs > > Sent: den 11 december 2014 08:55 > > To: centos at centos.org > > Subject:

On 27 May 2015, at 16:49, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > David, > > The link works fine with my Mac and Android. The source of the mail looks okay to me (I verified that from a different machine than the one I sent the mail). You may want to check your browser or proxy? It’s correct in the plain-text version of the mail. The HTML MIME part contains this: <a

Am 12.06.2020 um 02:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > * Andreas Born: > >> There exists one problem: at this stage of mail reception you have no >> body content nor header information on which a milter may perform >> deeper analysis, only envelope data. > > I am not sure what you mean by "this stage of mail reception", or what I meant the different stages when

There are times when I need to call a client from my cell and I want a recording of the call. I was trying to put into an * a way of doing that. Below is what I'm using in my extensions.conf exten=> X,1,Read(num,"/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/mtas/10digit",10,,,5) exten=> X,2,SayDigits(${num}) exten=> X,3,Background(/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/mtas/verify) exten=>

On 17/11/2014 07:23, Ron Leach wrote: > On 16/11/2014 07:24, Robert Schetterer wrote (re-ordered): >> Am 16.11.2014 um 02:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >> >>> * if you find a security issue in postfix running >>> on 587 over TLS cry out loud > > I'm thinking beyond that; I want to get to the position that when > there is an issue in the MTA, our

Full_Name: Thomas Richardson Version: R 2.9.0 GUI 1.28 Tiger build 32-bit (5395) OS: 10.4.11 Submission from: (NULL) (216.254.15.72) I have encountered a problem with points in scatterplots disappearing in a quartz window when it is re-sized (to make it larger). I am constructing an 8x12 matrix of scatterplots each containing approx 600 points. In order to get them in the window I remove the

Exists the possibility to define an RPM requires statement with a logic? Like: Requires: mysql-server OR mysql55-mysql-server MTAs like postfix have "Provides: MTA" to provide such facility. I do not see such possibility for DB packages ... Thanks -- LF

Hi all: I am trying to migrate a small company from Microsoft Exchange / Outlook to Thunderbird. I am evaluating e-mail server software. We have an Internet provider that we do not really want to rely upon. We also do not have the resources to maintain a mail server visible from the outside, especially regarding security updates. Each employee has an e-mail account on our current Internet

Hi, We actually have a mail hosting solutions with aprox. 100 thousand of email account, where about 90% of a customers use POP3 like email configuration. About a few mounths (we perfomed a lot of migration throught mbox email software to Maildir with dovecot) but i can see that the performance is very poor and receive complaint about delays of autentications of accounts. The solution

Something I noticed on a 2.1.7 director test cluster (two directors, three backends): 'doveadm proxy kick user' will kick all connections for that user on that director only. Any additional connections on other directors will remain active unless the command is run on all directors. Are the proxy and director sub-commands intended to be separate and distinct in their operation? If so,

Hi all: I am learning Dovecot step by step. I have enabled the Submission Server, in the hope that I would not need to learn other MTAs like Postfix. The Submission Server is very comfortable: it picks up the existing Dovecot configuration, so that you do not need to configure any user authentication separately. It is working fine on my test setup. My first thought was that, if the recipient

Am 11.06.2020 um 19:15 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > Generating backscatter is definitely not a good move, and it is even > prone to punish yourself. Better to reject the offending message with > a 5xx status code and some explanatory text or the URL. > > The various tests required to come to a decision about accepting or > rejecting the message can be executed in a milter.

Gerald Galster via dovecot schrieb: > mail1.yourdomain.com <http://mail1.yourdomain.com> IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail2.yourdomain.com <http://mail2.yourdomain.com>?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.10.1 > mail.yourdomain.com <http://mail.yourdomain.com> ?IN A 192.168.20.1 > > > mail1/mail2 is for

Hi, On the Dovecot wiki here http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director it says the following: "The directors are going to connect to each others in a ring. For example if you have servers called A, B and C, director will create connections A->B, B->C and C->A" I am curious what happens in a scenario when two or more directors fail and potentially break a ring in half, do the

I've been running into a reproducible problem when using default LVM volume group names to present block devices for virtual machines in KVM, and I'm wondering why it is happening. On dom0 I make a default VolGroup00 for the operating system. I make a second VolGroup01 for logical volumes that will be block devices for virtual systems. In VolGroup01, I make two lv's for one system:

On 15 May 2018, at 12.06, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > If you look at .176's error log, do you see an error about "director_consistent_hashing settings differ between directors"? Have you set director_consistent_hashing=yes in the old directors? That is needed now, because the old non-consistent-hashing method is obsoleted. Unfortunately there's no easy

Hi all, anyone having any problems with restarting the director? Every time I bring down 1 of the director servers, reboot it, or just restart it for whatever reason, im seeing all kinds of problems. Dovecot generally always gives me this error: Jan 20 22:49:55 imapdirector3 dovecot: director: Error: Director 194.109.26.173:444/right disconnected before handshake finished It seems the directors