similar to: Connecting ethX devices directly to a KVM/QEMU guest OS (SOLVED)

Hello CentOS gurus, and a belated Happy New Year (or an early Happy Chinese New Year). I'm in the process of building a CentOS-6 KVM host machine whose only function will be to run four independent 'm0n0wall' firewall guest instances. I have a couple of quad-port Intel NICs to provide four WAN-side and four LAN-side ports, which will not be shared with any other guests. Remote

Hello, I have been testing James'' GPLPV drivers and found excellent performance when using iperf but have been having issues when trying to download a file from a shared folder on my Windows 2003 Enterprise HVM to any other system whether it is linux or windows. Basically my initial iperf tests were showing 937Mbits/sec down and 345Mbits/sec up but when I try to copy a 2GB file

I have a router with only one physical ethernet cable. I know it''s stupid, but it is the network I have to use for a demo. I have in mind to construct an HTB class tree for some network limitations for the outgoing traffic. The question is: can i use the HTB class mechanism on 2 subinterfaces of the same physical network card without any interference? Please let me know as soon as

On 06/01/2015 06:42 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > >> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is >> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the >> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? > > There is no licensing issue, but

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6.

wiki name: HavardSorli Page for update : https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7 some notes / comments / open points to: FAQ "4. .... want it to work and to hand-edit the configuration files." My user case: "Adding an extra ip to the same interface" in the "old days" an alias. ( I am not sure if this should be an extra faq question, or incorporated in FAQ 4) I have

Hi all, Up until now, we''ve been using Xen 3.0 on CentOS 5.x. Under this setup, dom0 was given a virtual ''ethX'' with the original ''ethX'' (now ''pethX'') IP address. Under this older config, neither ''pethX'' or ''xenbrX'' had an IP address. The logic was to keep traffic from the domU''s, through

Running CentOS 5.5 x86_64 on Dell R710 boxes. I have the server(s) configured for bonding/vlan and will be using iscsi to a SAN. I am in the pre-deployment stage so I am just setting up the basic cookie cutter configurations so I haven't initiated the iscsi connection to a SAN yet. While going through the error messages I noticed this error: kernel: bnx2i: iSCSI not supported, dev=ethX.

And additionally here are the detailed port configs on the switch end: hq>show interface Gi1/0/3 switchport Name: Gi1/0/3 Switchport: Enabled Administrative Mode: trunk Operational Mode: trunk Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q Negotiation of Trunking: On Access Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 48 (VLAN0048) Administrative

Hi, I have a LAN server running CentOS 5.11 with two NICs eth0 and eth1. I'd like to swap the interface names, but I don't know how to go about that under CentOS. Here's what I would do on a Slackware server (I have one next to me in my office). Open /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and edit it: # PCI device 0x8086:/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/0000:03:00.0 (e1000e)

Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have a LAN server running CentOS 5.11 with two NICs eth0 and eth1. I'd > like to swap the interface names, but I don't know how to go about that > under CentOS. > > Here's what I would do on a Slackware server (I have one next to me in > my office). > > Open /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and edit it: > >

Hi I have a Centos 6.X router/firewall/gateway for a /29 network all connected to one ETHX that has a switch behind it. This setup works very well but does NOT allow me to QOS one of the devices (a VOIP phone, many lines) as for "tc" to work I need a device, not ipaddress. I thought to connect the VOIP phone directly to the router, but in doing so I need that interface to ACT like the

I figured I should post this because before I went to do it I searched the web for caveats etc and didn''t really find much. So anyway, I set up bonding + vlan for a project. Computer is dell powerdge 350 with 2 intel 82559 10/100 nic running stock 2.4.20. I tried both the eepro100 and the e100 drivers for the nics, both work 802.1q and bonding are modules. Switch is cisco 2924xl-en

Hi I change eth1 from realtek to dlink but the centos is showing eth2 instead of eth1 In another version of linux, I can change 70-persistent-net.rules but I check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules but it doesn't have the file 70-persistent-net.rules please help Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

Greetings, I'm just wondering how one can make the bridging tools stop spamming the virtual consoles? I would rather have all those "entering forwarding state", "entering learning state" and "entering disabled state" messages go to a log than have them plastered all over whichever console I happened to be logged into to work. Thanks! -- Martin-Eric Racine

Hello All, I am having trouble simulating a network cable disconnect with KVM. I would like to test active backup bonding for a switch IOS upgrade in a production environment. Basically I have the VM running on a bridged network which is also tied into GNS3 simulating a small-scale version of the production environment. I have tried bringing down the vnetX interface and the actual virtual

Hi All, A couple of weeks ago I noticed Askozia PBX, which is a new embedded Asterisk & OS distro at http://askozia.com/pbx. This caught my attention for two reasons; it uses v1.4 of Asterisk, and it uses the m0n0wall development framework to build on FreeBSD with a PHP based GUI. I've used m0n0wall for years, and FreeNAS also, which shares the same OS/GUI framework. I booted the latest

How do I tell LogCheck that I don't care what's in the rest of the search string? ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR igmp len [0-9]{2} \([0-9]{2}+\) IN$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR

OK, thanks again for all your help. I have resolved this, finally. The problem was that I configured VLAN 48 as the native VLAN on the trunk port.That was a mistake as apparently the native VLAN is the one where Cisco does not bother to tag packets. For now I set the native VLAN to VLAN 1 and that works. Cheers, Boris. On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at

I know a SIP client behind a NAT trying to peer with Asterisk behind another NAT is troublesome. Has anyone had any luck doing this by interfacing Asterisk to the WAN using 1:1 NAT translation to give it a public IP while still firewalled? In my instance I'm using m0n0wall, but this is a hardware-neutral question. Thanks. -- Robert Goodyear Brand Up LLC http://www.brand-up.com