similar to: Problem Accessing Samba share from Windows workstation via DNS Round Robin

i have a question for the people who sponsor the samba team. "when are you going to realise that your money is being wasted by not sponsoring me as a design architect on NT compatibility software suites for unix?" here - yet again, another demonstration of how much money you have been wasting. hopefully this time this "really new" proposal - i.e. yet ANOTHER idea and

[2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525) Got OID 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(525) Got OID 1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10 [2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_negotiate(528) Got secblob of size 1205 [2008/06/11 12:07:03, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_secrets_verify_ticket(249)

Hello, I'm trying to access a samba share using an ADS user credentials. I always get an error, and the debug traces (log level = 5) are giving me the output in the follow. I have searched the samba ML archives, and I have found the thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-April/084545.html but, before asking the system admin to apply the eventual KB fixes, I would like to know if the

I recently set up a new RHEL4 server with samba-3.0.10 in a Windows 2003 server PDC domain. I can log on as one user from different workstations on to the new samba server. With several other users, I get this error: Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: krb5_rd_req(CIFS/samba-server@MY.DOM) failed: Wrong principal in request Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: [2005/10/18 16:41:34,

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2

> > Hi All, > > > > Customer is requesting 1 incoming toll free #, that dial out to 4 > > different terminating numbers, not ring all at once but ring #1, then > > #2, then #3, then #4, then back to #1 consecutively on inbound calls, > > regardless if someone is on #1. So this is not like a hunt group, > > more like an agent queue set with a round-robin

Hi, Using ctdb, is it a valid setup to have : CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses containing only one ip address, thus with no round-robin. Is there a particular hard-coded limit that doesn't allow this? -- Nicolas Ecarnot

I was wondering if anyone has an easy way to emulate dialing in a round robin fashion like when you use Zap/r1 for Zap trunks. At the moment what I do is simply make a macro that will dial the sip trunks in order so if the first one fails it goes to the second and so on. The problem with this approach is that the first few SIP trunks will always be busy because of outgoing traffic. Is there an

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

Hello everybody, i have two gsm line (extra channels) and i'd like to schedule the outgoing calls with a round-robin strategy. If all the gsm lines are busy, the call must be sent to the pri lines with a linear strategy. here is the dialplan: exten => gsm,ChanIsAvail(EXTRA/r2&DAHDI/g1) same => n,GotoIf($["${AVAILORIGCHAN}" = ""]?unavail,1) same =>

Hi, Anyone knows if there is a way to play a list of sound file in a round robin mode (at specific interval) while someone in waiting in moh in a queue? Ok, you enter a queue and wait listening to moh, every X minutes a sound file is played from a list of sound files to be played. If that possible and if so how? Thanks for any pointers. Andre

Hello All, I've encountered a problem with OpenSSH_3.7.1p2 and krb5 authentication that I did not have using previous OpenSSH versions and krb5. I have a group of machines that are all listed as addresses for hostname.domain.blah via round-robin dns. When attempting to ssh to hostname.here.blah using krb5 auth, I get the following error: (client side) debug1: Authentications that can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Additional Comments From dleonard at vintela.com 2005-06-08 22:16 ------- a workaround at http://blog.macnews.de/unspecific/stories/4581/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #5 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:28 ------- There isn't an easy fix for this, at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Comment #7 from jan.iven at cern.ch 2006-10-24 02:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) (simplified patch - no config option) Given that the GSSAPI library will (unconditionally) use DNS anyway, perhaps we don't need yet another client-side config

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wilkinson <simon at sxw.org.uk> 2007-09-15 20:59:25 --- I've noted this on the mailing list too, but just for the record, the simplified patch is incorrect. GSSAPI != Kerberos, and even within the Kerberos space, some vendors ship with canonicalisation disabled. If we are going to ship a workaround for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pellegrini.dario at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from DarioP <pellegrini.dario at gmail.com> --- (In reply to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 kgizdov <mindrot at kge.pw> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mindrot at kge.pw --- Comment #12 from kgizdov <mindrot at kge.pw> --- I just wanted to chime in here to say that