similar to: Select rows based on multiple comparisons

Hi all, after using Amelia II to create 10 imputed data sets I need to average them to have one unique data that includes the average for each cell of the variables imputed, in addition to the values for the variables not imputed. Such data has many variables (some numeric, other factors), and more than 20000 observations. I do not know how to average them out. Any help? Below I provide a small

Hi, I have a table like that: > datatest var1 var2 var3 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 8 1 3 4 6 1 4 5 10 1 5 6 2 2 1 7 4 2 2 8 6 2 3 9 8 2 4 10 10 2 5 I need to create another table based on that with the rules: take a random sample by var2==1 (2 sample rows for example): var1 var2 var3 1 1

Hello, I am trying to set up a loop that can run the survdiff function with the ultimate goal to generate a csv file with the p-values reported. However, whenever I try a loop I get an error such as "invalid type (list) for variable 'survival_data_variables[i]". This is a subset of my data: structure(list(time = c(1.51666666666667, 72, 72, 25.7833333333333, 72, 72, 72, 72, 72,

Hello, I am trying to reformat some data so that it is organized by group in the columns. The data currently looks like this: group X3.Hydroxybutyrate X3.Hydroxyisovalerate ADP 347 4 4e-04 3e-04 5e-04 353 3 5e-04 3e-04 6e-04 359 4 4e-04 3e-04

The number of recent questions from umn.edu makes me wonder if there's homework involved.... Simpler for your example is to use get and subset. dat <- structure(..... as found below var.to.test <- names(dat)[4:6] #variables of interest nvar <- length(var.to.test) chisq <- double(nvar) for (i in 1:nvar) { tfit <- survdiff(Surv(time, completion==2) ~

Hi all, I have been trying to solve this problem and have had no luck so far. I have numeric vectors VAR1, VAR2, and VAR3 which I am trying to cbind. I also have a character vector "VAR1,VAR2,VAR3". How do I manipulate this character vector such that I can input a transformed version of the character vector into cbind and have it recognize that I'm trying to refer to my numeric

Hi, I am using R 1.9.1 on on i686 PC with SuSE Linux 9.0. I have a data.frame, e.g.: > myData <- data.frame( var1 = c( 1:4 ), var2 = c (5:8 ) ) If I add a new column by > myData$var3 <- myData[ , "var1" ] + myData[ , "var2" ] everything is fine, but if I omit the commas: > myData$var4 <- myData[ "var1" ] + myData[ "var2" ] the name

Buenos días. Hoy ando un poco (o bastante) espeso y no doy con la tecla de una cosa que seguro que es muy simple.. Pongo un ejemplo. var1 <- c(rep(0,3),rep(1,2)) var2 <- c(rep(1,2),0,0,1) var3 <- c(rep(1,2),rep(0,3)) var4 <- c(rep(1,2),rep(0,3)) datos <- data.frame(fila=1:5,var1, var2, var3, var4) datos datos fila var1 var2 var3 var4 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 0

Estimados Estoy entrenando hacer funciones que respondan a comandos, en esta caso en la salida gráfica se observa que dice : Exposure=var3 y outcome=var 1 quisiéramos que se reflejan los nombres de la base de datos : var1=estado, var2=cake, var3=chocolate Espero haberme explicado adecuadamente Adjunto tabla con datos #################################### #Comando que llama

Can someone please give me a clue how to 're'write this so I dont need to use loops. a<-ts(matrix(c(1,1,1,10,10,10,20,20,20),nrow=3),names=c('var1','var2','var3')) b<-ts(matrix(c(2,2,2,11,11,11,21,21,21),nrow=3),names=c('var1','var2','var3'))

Buenas noches Javier y José, Estoy en contra de usar attach(), asi que propongo la siguiente alternativa con with(): # paquete require(epicalc) # los argumentos en ... pasan de epicalc:::cc # ver ?cc para mas informacion foo <- function(var1, var2, var3, ...){ or1 <- cc(var1, var2, ...) or2 <- cc(var1, var3, ...) list(or1 = or1, or2 = or2) } # datos x <-

Dear mailing list members, I am a new R user, I would like to plot the follewing data var1 <- c(1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2,2) var2 <- round(rgamma(10,2,1)/0.1)*0.1 var3 <- c(0,1,0,1,0,0,0,0,1,0) var4 <- c(1,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1) Var <- data.frame(var1,var2,var3,var4) Var <- Var[sort(Var$var1),] tt <- Var$var1+((runif(length(Var$var1))/6)-(0.5/6)) labelname <- c("time 1",

Dear all, I am having trouble creating summary tables using aggregate function. given the following table: Var1 Var2 Var3 dummy S1 T1 I 1 S1 T1 I 1 S1 T1 D 1 S1 T1 D 1 S1 T2 I 1 S1 T2 I 1 S1 T2 D 1 S1 T2 D 1 S2

I have a data frame whose first colum contains the names of the variables and whose second colum contains the values to assign to them: : kkk <- data.frame(vars=c("var1", "var2", "var3"), vals=c(10, 20, 30), stringsAsFactors=F) If I do : assign(kkk$vars[1], kkk$vals[1]) it works : var1 [1] 10 However, if I try with mapply

HI R help, I was trying to get identical data frame from a list using two methods. #Suppose my list is: listdat1<-list(rnorm(10,20),rep(LETTERS[1:2],5),rep(1:5,2)) #Creating dataframe using cbind dat1<-data.frame(do.call("cbind",listdat1)) colnames(dat1)<-c("Var1","Var2","Var3") #Second dataframe conversion

Dear list, I'm trying to concatenate the values of two columns but im not able to do it: i have a dataframe with the following two columns: X VAR1 VAR2 1 2 2 1 3 2 4 3 5 4 6 4 what i would like to

Hello! # I have 3 vectors of values: values1<-rnorm(10) values2<-rnorm(10) values3<-rnorm(10) # In real life, all 3 vectors have a length of 25 # I create all possible combinations of 4 based on 10 elements: mycombos<-expand.grid(1:10,1:10,1:10,1:10) dim(mycombos) # Removing rows that contain pairs of identical values in any 2 of these columns: mycombos<-mycombos[!(mycombos$Var1

R users, I don't know if I can make myself clear but I'll give it a try. I have a data.frame like this x <- "var1,var2,var3,var4 a,b,b,a b,b,c,b c,a,a,a a,b,c,c b,a,c,a c,c,b,b a,c,a,b b,c,a,c c,a,b,c" DF <- read.table(textConnection(x), header=T, sep=",") DF and I would like to sum all the combinations/occurences by a factor (letter in this case) between

Dear list, I'm looking for an inverse function of melt(which is in package reshape).Namely, I had a data frame like this (Table1) YEAR VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 1995 7 3 45 1996 5 6 32 1997 6 10 15 I transformed my data by using the melt function and my data was reshaped in the following format: (Table2) YEAR variable

Carlos, en principio si sería algo así, sólo que en vez de quedarme con todas las columnas var1 a var4 tuviera sólo 3, ya que en mis datos no hay ningún caso que tenga el valor 1 en más de 3 variables.. Había llegado a una solución (mucho menos elegante que usando reshape), que implicaba un for sobre las filas. Jorge, creo que tu solución me vale. Muchas gracias a los dos.. Saludos El