similar to: Function accepted by optim but not mle2 (?)

Hi there I'm trying to find the mle fo a multinomial model ->*L(N,h,S?x)*. There is only *N* I want to estimate, which is used in the number of successes for the last cell probability. These successes are given by: p^(N-x1-x2-...xi) All the other parameters (i.e. h and S) I know from somewhere else. Here is what I've tried to do so far for a imaginary data set:

Hi, all. I'm working with published paleodemographic data (counts of skeletons that have been assigned into an age-range category, based upon observed morphological characteristics). For example, the following is the age distribution from a prehistoric cemetery in Egypt: naga <-

Hi all, Sorry for the re-post, I sent my previous e-mail before it was complete. I am trying to model seroprevalence using the differential equation: dP/dt = beta*seronegative*.001*(seropositive)-0.35*(0.999)*(seropositive)-r*seropositive. I would like to estimate my two parameters, beta and r, using maximum likelihood methods. I have included my code below:

Dear R listers, I have a data file looks like the following: Testing marker: s_1 --------------------------------------------- Allele df(0) -LnLk(0) df(T) -LnLk(T) ChiSq p 3 7995 29320.30 7994 29311.85 16.90 4e-05 (2229/8000 probands) Testing marker: s_2 --------------------------------------------- Allele df(0)

Full_Name: Lyle W. Konigsberg Version: 1.5.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (160.36.64.99) I apparently found an error in how "deriv" puts a derivative to the screen (though the internal representation is correct). Here's what I was doing for a class example: > lnlk<-expression(15*log(p)+11*log(1-p)) > p<-15/26 > D(D(lnlk,"p"),"p") -15 *

List gurus, I'm trying to code a Gompertz growth curve function as part of a larger project and have run across a problem due to my ignorance of environments. Some sample data and the function are as follows: growth <- data.frame(age = c(1.92, 3, 5.83, 3.17, 15.5, 1.17, 5.58, 13.33, 14.29, 5.83, 13.79, 6.33, 13.75, 16.83, 13, 11.67, 0.25, 1.73, 9.46, 5.67), length = c(157, 165, 179,

The mle2 function (bbmle library) gives an example something like the following in its help page. How do I access the coefficients, standard errors, etc in the summary of "a"? > x <- 0:10 > y <- c(26, 17, 13, 12, 20, 5, 9, 8, 5, 4, 8) > LL <- function(ymax=15, xhalf=6) + -sum(stats::dpois(y, lambda=ymax/(1+x/xhalf), log=TRUE)) > a <- mle2(LL,

Hi all, Sorry if this has been answered already, but I couldn't find it in the archives or general internet. Is it possible to implement the gompertz distribution as survreg.distribution to use with survreg of the survival library? I haven't found anything and recent attempts from my side weren't succefull so far. I know that other packages like 'eha' and

Dear list: I am attempting to use what I thought would be a pretty straightforward practical application of Cox regression. I figure users of the survival package must have come across this problem before, so I would like to ask you how you dealt with it. I have set up an illustrative example and included it at the end of this post. I took a sample of 100 data points from each of two populations

Hello, I have a log likelihood function that I was able to optimize using mle2. I have two years of the data used to fit the function and I would like to fit both years simultaneously to test if the model parameter estimates differ between years, using likelihood ratio tests and AIC. Can anyone give advice on how to do this? My likelihood functions are long so I'll use the tadpole

Hello, all. I have co-opted a number of functions that can be used to plot the hazard/survival functions and associated density distribution for a Gompertz mortality model, given known parameters. The Gompertz hazard model has been shown to fit relatively well to the human adult lifespan. For example, if I wanted to plot the hazard (i.e., mortality) functions: pop1 <- function (t) {

Hi I'm trying to maximize a joint likelihood of 2 likelihoods (Likelihood 1 and Likelihood 2) in mle2, where the parameters I estimate in Likelihood 2 go into the likelihood 1. In Likelihood 1 I estimate the vector logN with length 37, and for the Likelihood 2 I measure a vector s of length 8. The values of s in Lieklihood 2 are used in the Likelihood 1. I have 2 questions: ##1 I manage

I'm trying to get started with maximum likelihood estimation with a simple regression equivalent out of Bolker (Ecological Models and Data in R, p302). With this code: #Basic example regression library(bbmle) RegData<-data.frame(c(0.3,0.9,0.6),c(1.7,1.1,1.5)) names(RegData)<-c("x", "y") linregfun = function(a,b,sigma) { Y.pred = a+b*x

Hi, I'm trying to make multiple poisson regressions with the MLE2 command. I have used the following expression, but I receive an error message: poisfit <- mle2(y ~ dpois(exp(b0 + b1*x1 + b2*x2)), start=list(b0=1, b1=1, b2=1), data=data1) Error in optim(par = c(1, 1, 1), fn = function (p) : non-finite initial value 'vmmin' I have changed initial values using coefficient values

Hi all, When I try to estimate the functional response of the Rogers type I equation (for the mle2 you need the package bbmle): > RogersIbinom <- function(N0,attackR2_B,u_B) {attackR2_B+u_B*N0} > RogersI_B <- mle2(FR~dbinom(size=N0,prob=RogersIbinom(N0,attackR2_B,u_B)/N0),start=list(attackR2_B=4.5,u_B=0.16),method="Nelder-Mead",data=data5) I get following error message

Hi everybody, I'm interested in evaluating the effect of a continuous variable on the mean and/or the variance of my response variable. I have built functions expliciting these and used the 'mle2' function to estimate the coefficients, as follows: func.1 <- function(m=62.9, c0=8.84, c1=-1.6) { s <- c0+c1*(x) -sum(dnorm(y, mean=m, sd=s,log=T)) } m1 <- mle2(func.1,

Hi all, I have some problems with the mle2 function > RogersIIbinom <- function(N0,attackR3_B,Th3_B) {N0-lambertW(attackR3_B*Th3_B*N0*exp(-attackR3_B*(24-Th3_B*N0)))/(attackR3_B*Th3_B)} > RogersII_B <- mle2(FR~dbinom(size=N0,prob=RogersIIbinom(N0,attackR3_B,Th3_B)/N0),start=list(attackR3_B=1.5,Th3_B=0.04),method="Nelder-Mead",data=dat) Error in dbinom(x, size, prob, log)

Hi, In order to use the mle2-function, one has to define the likelihood function itself. As we know, the likelihood function is a sum of the logarithm of probability density functions (pdf). I have implemented myself the pdfs that I am using. My problem is, that the pdfs values are negative and I cann't take the logarithm of them in the log-likelihood function. So how can one take the

Hello R Help, I am trying solve an MLE convergence problem: I would like to estimate four parameters, p1, p2, mu1, mu2, which relate to the probabilities, P1, P2, P3, of a multinomial (trinomial) distribution. I am using the mle2() function and feeding it a time series dataset composed of four columns: time point, number of successes in category 1, number of successes in category 2, and

Hi- I'm a biologist trying to figure out the growth rate of salamanders in different ponds. I collected individuals from various populations at different dates, and using the size and date collected, I want to figure out the growth curve of each population. My question is: How do I fit my data to a Gompertz function in R? Thank you so much! Sarah -- View this message in context: