similar to: MASTER_AUTH_MAX_DATA_SIZE

Hello, I faced the problem with samba (AD) + mutt (gssapi) + dovecot (imap). From dovecot log: Jan 2 17:58:42 server dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected: Input buffer full (no auth attempts): rip=192.167.14.16, lip=192.167.14.16, secured My situation: CentOS 6.2 IMAP: dovecot --version: 2.0.9 (CentOS 6.2) MUA: mutt 1.5.20 (CentOS 6.2) Kerberos: samba4 4.0.0alpha17 as AD PDC $ klist -e Ticket

Hello I have been playing with some exotic authentication scheme with Dovecot and PAM. That involves sending really large base64 encoded data as the IMAP password, and I have hit a line limit in Dovecot, with AUTH_WORKER_MAX_LINE_LENGTH set to 1024. This limit is especially frustrating since other parts of the software use much larger limits: MAX_INBUF_SIZE 4096 MAX_IMAP_LINE 8192

Short story: cannot get Kerberized NFSv4 to work. I've googled a great deal and cannot find where I have goofed (and there sure is a lot of misleading and just plain incorrect information out there), so would appreciate another pair of eyes. NFSv4 without Kerberos does work fine, as does ID mapping. We're using NFSv4 in production with sec=sys, but I'm not happy with that. My

Short story: cannot get Kerberized NFSv4 to work. I've googled a great deal and cannot find where I have goofed (and there sure is a lot of misleading and just plain incorrect information out there), so would appreciate another pair of eyes. NFSv4 without Kerberos does work fine, as does ID mapping. We're using NFSv4 in production with sec=sys, but I'm not happy with that. My

In the release notes for v1.2.2, Timo said: > Found and fixes several v1.2-specific bugs. Hopefully it's now stable > for most people's usage. > > * GSSAPI: More changes to authentication. Hopefully good now. > What were the GSSAPI changes? I am having problems with _some_ of my users using GSSAPI auth. I am using version 1.2.1. The client (thunderbird) reports that the

I'm reading Torgo (2010) *Data Mining with R*<http://www.liaad.up.pt/~ltorgo/DataMiningWithR/code.html>in preparation for a class I'll be teaching next quarter. Here's an example that is very non-functional. > pH <- c(4.5,7,7.3,8.2,6.3) > names(pH) <- c('area1','area2','mud','dam','middle') > pH area1 area2 mud dam

Is it possible to refer to an object from within a method, as in *this *in Java? I can't find anything about this in the documentation. Sorry if I missed it. Thanks. *-- Russ Abbott* *_____________________________________________* *** Professor, Computer Science* * California State University, Los Angeles* * Google voice: 747-*999-5105 * blog: *http://russabbott.blogspot.com/ vita:

During a stress test dovecot-2.0.11 logs many warnings: Mar 8 06:19:52 gromit dovecot[59204]: imap(pid 68864 user user15): Warning: /Volumes/Mail/user15/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 183: 1299556557.M571530P31883.gromit.example.com,S=21175,W=21549 (uid 67 -> 250) Mar 8 06:20:10 gromit dovecot[59204]: imap(pid 68865 user user34): Warning: /Volumes/Mail/user34/dovecot-uidlist:

On 3 Dec 2016, at 20.47, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > In my journey to enable SAML auth for our webmail (sogo.nu) I have > created a password-less dovecot imap listener on 127.0.0.1/32, so that > once a user is SAML authenticated for the SOGo webmail, SOGo can connect to dovecot on 127.0.0.1:143 with something like "01 LOGIN username

Hello, I have a running setup with a dovecot imap4/pop3 proxy to a few dovecot backend servers which actually store the mailboxes. This is running smoothly and allows me to transparently distribute mailboxes. I'm using some "extrafield" configured in the LDAP passdb. However, now I would like to use GSSAPI (preferred) and NTLM for single sign-on. Both are pretty straightforward to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Can Asterisk(*) be installed on this and if so are the setup instructions any different? I have a client that's asking. Specs: 533Mhz, 512MB RAM, 10GB HDD, Cobalt 4 OS - -- ================================= Joshua Abbott, Support Technician http://www.successfulhosting.com/ Direct Line: PENDING Phone: (866) 494-5096 x1207 E-Fax: (419)

Hi, I'm still confused about how to find out what methods are defined for a given class. For example, I know that > today <- Sys.Date() will produce an object of type Date. But I'm not sure what I can do with Date objects or how I can find out. > ?Date refers me to the Date documentation page. But it doesn't tell me how, for example, to extract the current year from a

I may be totally wrong about what the fields_for method is supposed to do, but for some reason I thought using it scoped an object around an association. For example, I have a User class and when you''re creating a new user I want to use fields_for to add a BillingAddress to the user like so: <%- fields_for :billing_address do |billing_address_form| -%> <%= render :partial

Hi Here are a few unintegrated patches, just tested against 2.2rc7: 1) NetBSD's getmntinfo uses struct statvfs while other BSD use struct statfs http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/patch-ak 2) NetBSD 5.x net_getunixcred() support. Build on NetBSD, but not tested (I am testing on NetBSD 6.0): http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/patch-src_lib_net.c 3) Increase authentication buffer size so that it

Hi, In my journey to enable SAML auth for our webmail (sogo.nu) I have created a password-less dovecot imap listener on 127.0.0.1/32, so that once a user is SAML authenticated for the SOGo webmail, SOGo can connect to dovecot on 127.0.0.1:143 with something like "01 LOGIN username randompassword". Watching this (tcpflow) as it happens,i can see the following auth attempt coming from

On 06/13/2017 07:33 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2017, at 17:23, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2017 08:03 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote: >>>> On

Attached please find a perl script which tests the CATENATE support in dovecot. I used this to test my CATENATE implementation a few years ago and it runs fine against dovecot in OS X Server. When run against dovecot-2.2.4 though it always fails or hangs, which in some cases means we interpreted RFCs differently and in other cases means it's finding bugs; both conditions are worthy of

Sorry about the formatting... Anyway, I think there may be a misinterpretation of bound_cntl. My understanding is that: 0 => if the source is invalid or disabled, do not write a result 1 => if the source is invalid or disabled, use a 0 instead So the problematic case is where bound_cntl is 0, not when it is 1. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Stellard [mailto:tstellar at redhat.com]

Heya, we are seeing some strange issues with IMAP ID command using latest Roundcube builds on dovecot 2.2.10 responding "Input buffer full, aborting". Roundcube webmail connects to IMAP server and issues ID command first with some long arguments to ID command, however shorter than 1024 octets, which are specified in RFC2971 for ID IMAP extension. The situation is easily

Here are the first few simple patches from Apple, based on dovecot-1.1.7. The comments with "APPLE" in them helped us merge in your new releases; feel free to remove them. Please let me know if you want subsequent patches in a different format, or if you have any questions. Patch #1. Some versions of Mac OS X have buggy CMSG_* macros. -------------- next part -------------- A