similar to: Missing files on windows_port branch

c'est quoi cette chelouzerie ? je parle de l'ajout du sizeof(DWORD)... et ce que ce serait pas un str*n*cpy ou s*n*printf la vraie solution ? Arno 2012/5/3 Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Thu May ?3 08:31:38 2012 > New Revision: 3554 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3554 > > Log: >

Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Fri Nov 26 14:01:35 2010 > New Revision: 2705 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2705 > > Log: > Add regex library for drivers (by Arnaud Quette) > > Modified: > branches/windows_port/drivers/Makefile.am Why is this needed? The value of

> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org> > To: nut-commits at lists.alioth.debian.org > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:57:09 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2940 - in > branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/Installer: . ImageFiles > ImageFiles/Binary ImageFiles/Others ImageFiles/emptyDir >

Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > Modified: branches/windows_port/include/wincompat.h > ============================================================================== > --- branches/windows_port/include/wincompat.h Wed Jan 26 15:05:16 > 2011 (r2852) > +++ branches/windows_port/include/wincompat.h Wed Jan 26 15:16:09 > 2011 (r2853) > @@

Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > --- branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/wininit.c Tue Jan 18 > 08:57:03 2011 (r2838) > +++ branches/windows_port/scripts/Windows/wininit.c Tue Jan 18 > 10:05:01 2011 (r2839) > @@ -285,8 +285,11 @@ > char fn[SMALLBUF]; > FILE *nutf; > char buf[SMALLBUF]; > + const char * conf_path; > > -

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev op gmail.com>: > Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:01:14 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2726 - in branches/windows_port: common drivers include > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Thu Dec 9 14:01:07 2010 > New Revision: 2726 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2726 > > Log: > More work on serial drivers. > Still

Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:28:47 +0000 > Subject: svn commit r2704 - in branches/windows_port: . common > drivers include scripts scripts/Windows server > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Fri Nov 26 13:28:46 2010 > New Revision: 2704 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2704 > > Log: > Change the "full services" approach to a more POSIX

Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > - res = w32_serial_read(fd,buf,buflen,timeout); > + res = w32_serial_read((serial_handler_t *)fd,buf,buflen,timeout); Rather than casting away the const (which may not be possible with certain strict compiler flags), it is better to modify the prototype and definition of this function to take a 'const

Citeren Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest op alioth.debian.org>: > +REM copy DLL files from system > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-1.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-crypto-1.0.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\msys\1.0\bin\msys-ssl-1.0.0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others > +copy /Y c:\mingw\bin\libgnurx-0.dll .\ImageFiles\Others How can we be

On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Emilien KIA wrote: > 2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >> Emilien, >> >> just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! >> We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. > > I am just fixing some bugs

On mar., 2011-01-18 at 19:52 +0000, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Tue Jan 18 19:52:02 2011 > New Revision: 2845 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2845 > > Log: > Prefer to use static variables locally over global variables (to prevent namespace conflicts) > > Modified: > branches/windows_port/common/common.c

Hello, As you may have noticed, a first running version of nut for Windows has been released some time ago. In order to validate the possibility to merge the windows_port branch to the trunk, I have produced a patch file using the "svn diff" command. This patch couldn't be applied directly and the use of a merging tool is still needed. It is only intended to be reviewed so that we

Hi, No patches today, sorry, just three little observations (i'm compiling windows_port branch on Debian GNU/Linux testing with mingw): * missing but required by the configure scripts/augeas/nutupsconf.aug.in scripts/hal/ups-nut-device.fdi.in scripts/udev/nut-usbups.rules.in * it autodetects hal and udev support but (of course) fails to cross-compile it (so i had to use

[please use reply-all to include the list. thanks!] On Mar 7, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Denis Serov <intrudo at outlook.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > I would like to ask about current state of Windows port. Is it frozen? It will be cool to know the plans :) > > Where are a lot of Windows-branches at GitHub. What is the most actual one? github/Windows-v2.6.5-7 is the most recent

Fr?d?ric, I'm curious as to how you are configuring the windows_port branch. When I try to cross-compile, configure complains about socklen_t: $ ./configure --host=i686-pc-mingw32 Network UPS Tools version 2.4.3 [...] checking for socklen_t... no checking for socklen_t equivalent... configure: error: Cannot find a type to use in place of socklen_t The test (m4/nut_type_socklen_t.m4) is

2014/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > Emilien, > > just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! > We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. I am just fixing some bugs and implementing some minor windows-specific features. > The problem is that

Emilien, just saw your commit in Buildbot for testing some Windows changes. That's great that someone is working on this again! We have had a few users ask for updates to the 2.6.5+ version of NUT for Windows. The problem is that we do not have a good branch in Git to work from. The windows_port branch got rebased, but since it has merge commits, it is a bit of a mess. I apologize for

Hi Eric, One corner case I ran across when building from a reposurgeon-generated tree is that .gitignore files do not seem to be generated when a directory is created at the same time as its svn:ignore property is set. In NUT, this manifests itself in r3109: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3109 Trac doesn't show it there, but scripts/avahi was created in that commit,

Dear folks, According to mge-mib.c (NUT 2.6.2) LB condition is gained from variable .1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.5.14.0 (i.e. upsmgBatteryLowBattery.0). The test device of me does not set this variable to yes(1) even if runtime drops below the preconfigured limit. I complained about this at Schneider Electric. They replied that low battery status is indicated by .1.3.6.1.4.1.705.1.5.14.0

There is now a public reposurgeon repository at: git at gitorious.org:reposurgeon/reposurgeon.git I've tagged 2.0pre9 there, for two purposes: * Charles can verify that I've solved the missing-files problem. * Hartmut can rework the few of his patches I didn't merge into reposurgeon. Charles, our next and final challenge is to generate proper merge commits in the NUT repo