similar to: FTS-Solr plugin

So with "fts_autoindex=yes" enabled in plugins, is there anything I should be running regularly, other than the expunge/purge, to ensure Solr indexes are updated? I have a daily Solr optimize, and Solr autocommit enabled. I have an hourly "doveadm index -A *" command - is that unneeded? -- Daniel On 4/12/2015 6:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 10 Apr 2015, at 21:55,

Hello, i am currently using squat dovecot, but some users that have lots os emails ( 1GB ) are complaining about speed. Iam using dovecot 2.0.13 on debian 6 my squat conf is plugin { fts = squat fts_squat = partial=4 full=5 } I am thinking in maybe start to use Solr, so any one can help me with an decision? I am probably gonna update dovecot to 2.1 next year. and them maybe change the FTS

Does this work (pcap attached)? Daniel On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 09.02.2017 07:54, Daniel Miller wrote: >> I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump >> to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my >> schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak >> it work with the new

I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak it work with the new version...it works! I did not copy the database, started from scratch, and executed a "doveadm fts rescan -A". But... Judging solely from at least one

What dovecot version are you using? On 10.02.2017 09:12, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Yeah, thanks. > > It seems that there indeed is content-type header (there should not be). > We'll look into it. > > Aki > > On 10.02.2017 01:44, Daniel Miller wrote: >> Does this work (pcap attached)? >> >> Daniel >> >> On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser at example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13

> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part. > > sry, i'm a bit confused. > > you'd suggested I _add_ it, > > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html > > > I

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ?

Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) > Hi Aki, I didn't yet

On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in fts_solr setting, in your case > > fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts changing - fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 + fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts

Hi all, I have just stumbled over an issue with the FTS plugin of dovecot. For our primary namespace, INBOX and its subfolders, searching works without any problems but in a second namespace, which I have created for old/archived mails, searching of the mail text/body does not work. I can see the search request in the tomcat log but no result is created and the mail client (Thunderbird) keeps

On 11/13/20 9:46 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x?>> (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? >> (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob? >> > (1) I can't, I'm still on an earlier version I'll look for the 8.6.3,

On 13/11/2020 19:55, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 9:56 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: >>> (2) see here: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr >>> >>> two useful settings are debug and rawlog_dir=whatever to be added in >>> the same line as fts_solr > > with > > ????fts_solr = ... debug > > line #35 @ https://pastebin.com/9ecLQspD _looks_ like

On 11/1/20 1:56 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > At the moment I don't see other corrections needed in dovecot apart from > command line doveadm fts which is not a show stopper. Via doveadm search > I confirm - on my simple config - that search for accented or non > accented characters works correctly as it does via imap connection. thx. hopefully it'll get considered for a next

The Solr FTS engine appends domain names to the "user" and "id" fields inside Solr when indexing. However, when an IMAP search is performed, the domain name is not appended, resulting in 0 results, 100% of the time. You can reproduce this by setting up dovecot to have user names like?"admin", "james", etc (as opposed to admin at example.com). Then import

Hello list, * apache-solr-3.6.2 * dovecot-2.1.7 I configured fts_solr for dovecot, but I have two issues When doing a search request within telnet 127.0.0.1 143 it connects to solr. Jul 21, 2013 4:38:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select params={rows=1&q=box:10361d30f8c4ea51ad7c00002ecaff3b+user:" tom at

On 11/1/20 10:35 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Yes, getting more data about any potential problem would be useful. > > Just to clarify: I have a fully working search setup for some time now > over various dovecot releases, so no patches needed to get it working. > > My setup does use fts plugin and fts-solr plugin, but it does not use > lib-fts functionality (that has many

On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though > fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search > results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits. Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction. Also on the 'good news' page, it appears there's been some progress on

>Hi, > >we have activated fts-solr about a week ago and immediately started to >experience really *low* performance with MOVE and EXPUNGE commands. >After several days of googling, tcpdumping and straceing i was able to >find and resolve the problem. > >We are using Dovecot 2.2.27 from Debian Jessie (jessie-backports), >which is doing a soft commit in solr after