similar to: --compare-dest apparently incompatible with --checksum or --size-only

I'm trying this again because the last attempt didn't go through (thus more or less proving one of the below to be true.) Jesse Molina wrote: > > Test123 > > My messages to this mailing list are disappearing. > > Is this list quietly being moderated? > > Have I been wrongly black-holed? > > SpamAssassin gone wrong? > > > -- # Jesse

Hi All, I have a 75GB collection of data, including a lot of duplicated files, on a NTFS network drive. I want to backup that data across a DSL link to a Linux host. Currently I use cwrsync on a Windows machine to act as server to the Linux rsync client. I want to avoid transferring duplicated data, as the DSL link is a far more significant factor than computation/disk IO. I can't work

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <r at sys4.de> wrote: >> That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!) >> mails in his inbox. > > Anyone ever found a reliable way to do this? > > It sure would be nice if dovecot could perform this on a per

Sorry, accidentally deleted the previous message so have to write this as new, rather than reply. At any rate, my CentOS 5.6 installation shows fdupes as available through rpmforge. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Angel: Acathla turned to stone, as demons sometimes do, and was buried where

I've seen fslint and fdupes recommended for this in CentOS, but neither seem to be available as packages. Is anyone using either under CentOS-5.6? It seems that they are available in the rpmfusion-free repository, but as far as I can see this is not functioning with CentOS at present. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 10.06.2014 15:17, schrieb Steffen Kaiser: >> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: >>> On 6/9/2014 5:44 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <r at sys4.de> wrote: >>>> That's probably the problem here. The user had LOTS of (duplicate!) >>>> mails in his inbox.

I imagine we can save some space on our file server by cleaning up all the files that are saved multiple times by different people. There is already the fdupes command in linux that will scan a directory tree and report what files have duplicates. This could be easily scripted to turn those duplicate files into symlinks to one file. The problem is see, then, is what would happen if someone

Hello, I use rsync (3.0.9) to make backups with the link-dest option, so that I keep daily folders, and I only upload the difference. However, when a directory is moved somewhere else in the tree, it is fully re-uploaded. Same thing when files are simply renamed, they are re-uploaded, not linked. First option could be to use --fuzzy twice (migrating to 3.1.0), but I think that it can be very IO

I use rsync to backup my system, using a command-line such as the following: > rsync [src] [dst] -a --link-dest --size-only In this case, [src] is produced by a command that makes no attempt to preserve timestamps ("svnadmin hotcopy", in this case). That's why I use --size-only. Here's the rub: identical files aren't hard-linked like I expect them to be. They're full

Sorry, but it seems that I have banned from list. I can reciveve, but can not send posts. Hi! When I use Dial(type/identifier, timeout, A(some_file)) CDR billsec starts when announcement ends. But I have to bill from when called party answers to phone. How can I solve my problem? -- Suich

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Mark Foley wrote: >> About the 'cur' I'd not be too sure. > > Well, I'm just restoring to .Deleted Items, so it shouldn't be a problem. The tar restore > should preserve names, permission, etc. I'll backup the current Maildir, the try the restore > and see what happens. I'll report

Hi all, i am trying to setup my first t1 in asterisk, i have been using asterisk for several years but ahve never needed a t1 line before. I have a sangoma card already in the server with 4fxo ports. Now i ordered two single port t1 line cards from sangoma for the two servers i am connecting with the point 2 point t1. I am currently at the location trying to set things up but have some

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036 Bug ID: 12036 Summary: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

Hi all, I have just migrated my tooling from version 2.6.9 to 3.0.0. Unfortunately my script generated an error message during the execution. Because this command was working perfectly in the previous version I suspect this could be a bug. This is the command that I am executing: rsync -av --link-dest=20080313/ --compare-dest=/data/20080313/ 20080313/ /data/20080314/ It just

Hi, I just noticed that the value of the '--compare-dest' argument is simply prepended to the DEST argument, even if that has path compnents. For example with this command: rsync -a --compare-dest=$comparedest \ remote::something/1/ \ /local/path/to/1/ if the remote 'something' module has a file called '1/2/3/4/file' (which is going to be mirrored to

Hi all! I want to sync/copy a tree from a remote system to my local computer. Let 's say they are completly synced. When I do rsync remote.computer:/storage /new-storage --compare-dest=/ -a -v As expected rsync does not copy the files but copies/recreate the symlinks in the new folder. Is there a way to suppress this (the creation of the links) when they are the same? Tobias

Hey. Can anybody spot my mistake? mkdir a b c echo foo > a/test echo foo > b/test rsync -av --compare-dest=b a/ c/ Expected results: no copy of a/test to c/test, since it is already present in b. Actual results: a/test gets copied to c/test What is wrong here? My expectation? my syntax? I'm having the same trouble with --link-dest, and --copy-dest. The behaviour I'm seeing

I'm translating rsync.1, and i'm having some problems with the --compare-dest option description, actually i dont understand the part which describes the usefulness of this option, it says : This is useful for doing transfers to a new destination while leaving existing files intact, and then doing a flash-cutover when all files have been successfully transferred (for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479 Summary: --compare-dest suppresses output file if same timestamp present Product: rsync Version: 2.5.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1479 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-06-25 19:12 ------- Yes, it certainly can seem counter intuitive that the