similar to: Lucene vs Solr with 2.1 single server

So with "fts_autoindex=yes" enabled in plugins, is there anything I should be running regularly, other than the expunge/purge, to ensure Solr indexes are updated? I have a daily Solr optimize, and Solr autocommit enabled. I have an hourly "doveadm index -A *" command - is that unneeded? -- Daniel On 4/12/2015 6:53 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 10 Apr 2015, at 21:55,

Hello, try to use the new 2.1rc and don't get any data in the searchindex. Tried first lucene, and switched than back so solr. If I do an search in an mailfolder, i get in the dovecot-log 2012-02-06 22:17:11 | dovecot: | indexer-worker(xxxxxx): Indexed 0 messages in INBOX/dovecot Log from solr. Feb 6, 2012 10:17:11 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: []

Hi Timo, As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go... Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically updated indexes is one downside for its implementation... Also, does the release of Solr 4.0 mean anything for the lucene library

Using Debian, dovecot-solr 1:2.2.26.0-4, and solr-tomcat 3.6.2+dfsg-9, I am getting 400 errors when doing searches. Here is an example search query from dovecot that failed (captured with wireshark): Frame 23: 338 bytes on wire (2704 bits), 338 bytes captured (2704 bits) on interface 0 Linux cooked capture Internet Protocol Version 6, Src: ::1, Dst: ::1 Transmission Control Protocol, Src

I'm getting some log errors with clucene that I am having no luck tracking down on the interwebs. Errors: May 19 05:05:16 indexer-worker(gessel at blackrosetech.com)<62971><aPAEI3zLw17A/QAA0J78UA:EF25M3zLw1779QAA0J78UA>: Error: lucene index /mail/blackrosetech.com/gessel//lucene-indexes: IndexWriter::addDocument() failed (#4): language not available for stemming May 19 05:05:16

Hi, Looking at the source, it doesn't seem like fts-solr checks for settings changes using fts_index_have_compatible_settings() like fts-lucene does. Is there any special reason for why fts-solr shouldn't also rebuild indexes if settings has changed? /Peter

Does this work (pcap attached)? Daniel On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > On 09.02.2017 07:54, Daniel Miller wrote: >> I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump >> to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my >> schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak >> it work with the new

Solr 7 returns JSON by default but fts_solr requires XML. Would be good to have wt=xml added to the query to force it to xml all the time, this would prevent errors if solr has not had xml set as default for index. Dovecot 2.2.36 Centos 6 *Doveadm Request:* doveadm search -u caroline at covermg.com TEXT smith doveadm(caroline at covermg.com): Error: fts_solr: Invalid XML input at 1:0: not

I've been running Solr for a while (4.10.3) - wanted to make the jump to the latest & greatest. I installed 6.4.1, copied over my schema.xml - and after a couple false starts where I needed to tweak it work with the new version...it works! I did not copy the database, started from scratch, and executed a "doveadm fts rescan -A". But... Judging solely from at least one

I don't know if this was supposed to have changed with dovecot2, but http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS shows fts = squat solr so, since I have the lucene plugin?"fts = lucene" works by itself?I tried fts = squat lucene but: $ doveadm index '*' doveadm(dave): Error: fts: Failed to initialize backend 'squat lucene': Unknown backend So, is that syntax

On 12/4/2018 10:40 AM, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > > In the Wiki, ( https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr ), it would > nice to stipulate to the reader? to type the command : > > sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create -c dovecot # to create the > dovecot instance > > before updating the schema.xml . > > Also,? schema.xml is in

THank you Now, for the results I see the member of fts_result is : ARRAY_TYPE(seq_range) definite_uids; I have the UID as a aray of uint32_t * How to put my UIDs into this "definite_uids" ? Obviously this is not a simple array/pointer. How to say someting similar to result->definite_uids[1]=my_uid ? On 2019-01-12 10:25, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 11 Jan 2019, at 21.23,

What dovecot version are you using? On 10.02.2017 09:12, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Yeah, thanks. > > It seems that there indeed is content-type header (there should not be). > We'll look into it. > > Aki > > On 10.02.2017 01:44, Daniel Miller wrote: >> Does this work (pcap attached)? >> >> Daniel >> >> On 2/8/2017 10:57 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:

>Hi, > >we have activated fts-solr about a week ago and immediately started to >experience really *low* performance with MOVE and EXPUNGE commands. >After several days of googling, tcpdumping and straceing i was able to >find and resolve the problem. > >We are using Dovecot 2.2.27 from Debian Jessie (jessie-backports), >which is doing a soft commit in solr after

Hi, I am planning on running on test between maildir and mdbox to see which is a better fit for my use case. And I'm just looking for general advice/recommendation. I will post any results I obtain here. Important question: I have multiple users hitting the same email account at the same time. Can be a problem with mdbox? (either via thunderbird or with custom webmail apps). I remember

Hello list, * apache-solr-3.6.2 * dovecot-2.1.7 I configured fts_solr for dovecot, but I have two issues When doing a search request within telnet 127.0.0.1 143 it connects to solr. Jul 21, 2013 4:38:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select params={rows=1&q=box:10361d30f8c4ea51ad7c00002ecaff3b+user:" tom at

On 2012-11-07 15:14, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 7.11.2012, at 15.01, Charles Marcus wrote: > >> As one who is interested in implementing FTS sometime in the future, >> I'm curious about what is in store as far as improvements go... >> >> Specifically, any plans for implementing immediate/automatic index >> updates at delivery time? The lack of automatically

__ Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay francis at francisaugusto.com Mobile: +47 45 17 14 91 Oslo, Norway Sent from a mobile device / Enviado a partir de dispositivo m?vel > On 24 Jul 2020, at 19:34, Shawn Heisey <elyograg at elyograg.org> wrote: > > ?On 7/22/2020 11:13 AM, Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay wrote: >> On Solr I get this error: >>

> I'm a denizen of the solr-user at lucene.apache.org mailing list. > [...] > Here's a wiki page that I wrote about that topic. This wiki is going > away next month, but for now you can still access it: > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems That's a great resource, Shawn. I am about to put together a test case to provide a comprehensive FTS

Hello All, I always used dovecot and I'm pretty happy with it, but recently I changed OS (to ubuntu 18) and to get dovecot LTS with lucene (the default I was using on my previous arch installation) I needed to build from source the version 2.3.10 (the one that came with the repos was older and clucene was not actually supported) The problem is that the Clucene is not behaving well, It