Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Question on httpd"
2011 Sep 01
3
Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd?
Upstream provided their SRPM yesterday, i.e. Aug 31 19:40. [0] [1]
It builds flawless on several machines I tried (Scientific Linux 6,
CentOS 5 and 6).
Question is: Should one deploy a self-build RPM or will there be an
update in the next... "time"?
(Given
2009 Aug 06
2
traceenable for httpd
On centos 5.3 x86_64 I can add "traceenable off" to httpd.conf and that
works well.
however this doesnt seem to work for centos 4.7 i686.
Is there a similiar named option on 4.7?
Jerry
2014 Oct 23
2
httpd on centos 7
I have read the info on apache 2.4...
I added to the bottom of httpd.conf these lines (and restarted httpd)
-------------------------
<Directory /var/www/html>
# old 2.2 config
# Order Allow,Deny
# Allow from all
AllowOverride None
Require all granted
</Directory>
<Directory /home/silentm/public_html/gifs>
AllowOverride None
Require all granted
</Directory>
2011 Dec 14
2
Apache httpd-2.2.15 updates
Hello,
I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.
I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?
There was a security fix just
2008 Nov 11
1
CESA-2008:0967 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 httpd Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
6501c1e582d31facd53dd63391f5e86f httpd-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.x86_64.rpm
31fb222701a58a20254d4db035fcd873 httpd-devel-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm
2009 May 21
2
magic.mime dependency problem between file and httpd
Hi everyone! :-)
While doing a regular manual yum update on my ContOS 5.3 server, yum
complained as follows:
[root at sith ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* epel: ftp.icm.edu.pl
* rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de
* base: centosb2.centos.org
* updates: centose.centos.org
* extras: centosb2.centos.org
* addons:
2008 Nov 11
1
CESA-2008:0967 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0967 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0967.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2d0f8e04f56bbc5dcb3a0fb64a74e89a httpd-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm
4785cfd30d6cb160beb48199382fb241 httpd-devel-2.2.3-11.el5.centos.4.i386.rpm
2012 May 08
2
Equivalent RHEL package for CentOS httpd package?
I'm trying to find out if a particular RedHat patch has been ported to
CentOS yet.
In particular, this vulnerability: CVE-2011-3607
According to this: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0323.html it
has been patched as of httpd-2.2.3-63.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
Now, in the latest CentOS repository, I find
httpd-2.2.3-63.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
Is this the same (or later) release? I suspect
2009 Jun 03
1
yum best policy && magic.mime problem (httpd update)
Hi! I have 2 questions :
1. I heard about an best and all policy with yum for 64bit arch .. how
can i change the policy to best as is annoying to have doubled packages
when i need only the 64bit ones ...
2. i try to update the apache and i have this :
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: httpd
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.x86_64
2009 Apr 19
4
httpd crashes after signal HUP
Hello
I'm running CentOS 5.3 with httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 and php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3.x86_64. When the logrotate scripts run and send the HUP signal to httpd, the httpd process quits instead of reloading. The only thing I can find in the logs is this:
[Sun Apr 19 04:02:04 2009] [notice] seg fault or similar nasty error detected in the parent process
There wasn't any segfault
2007 Nov 27
4
Need help with httpd.conf not rendering cgi or php files
I got this working perfectly at home - what should be exact same setups-
- Fresh install of CentOS 5 32-bit from DVD
- yum update & upgrade
- Reboot
- yum install mysql-server
- Download phpmyadmin and bugzilla from their respective home pages
- Move both to /var/www/html, naming the extracted phpmyadmin directory as
phpmyadmin, the same with bugzilla
- Copy my working httpd.conf file from
2009 May 28
1
CESA-2009:1075 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1075 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b46184784e95094390c99e7446ffdcb0 httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
c28724e79e533d05769ef0ff5c9935d1 httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
2009 May 28
1
CESA-2009:1075 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1075 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b46184784e95094390c99e7446ffdcb0 httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
c28724e79e533d05769ef0ff5c9935d1 httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
2011 Jan 14
1
httpd and selinux
Hello,
Running httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 on CentOS release 5.5 (Final), I
have :
$ ps -Ze
LABEL PID TTY TIME CMD
user_u:system_r:httpd_t 12833 ? 00:00:00 httpd
Is it normal for httpd to have this context (user_u:system_r:httpd_t) ?
I was expecting system_u:system_r:httpd_t.
And if it is not normal, is it because I have restarted httpd by
2009 Aug 03
1
excessive DNS slows httpd
My web server is a CentOS box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
root ~]# rpm -q httpd
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2
My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus:
[root ~]# uname -a
Linux mbrc32 2.6.23.17-88.fc7 #1 SMP Thu
May 15 00:35:10 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
2009 Aug 28
2
Need httpd / apache RPM > 2.2.3 for 5.3
Hey folks,
It looks to me like the httpd on CentOS is stuck at 2.2.2 - what's up
with that? Even after a yum upgrade.
I need 2.2.10 or greater, and would prefer to get it via yum or at
very last an RPM if at all possible. But I cannot even find an RPM
out there. For some reason both EPEL and Dag Wieers do not even seem
to have an httpd RPM for RHEL5
Any idea where to look?
Why are we
2014 Oct 02
3
slammed
I just got SLAMMED with accessed to httpd from
91.230.121.156
I added the address to my firewall to drop it.
FYI
host 91.230.121.156
156.121.230.91.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
no-rdns.offshorededicated.net.
Jerry
2007 Sep 03
1
recompiling httpd
hi,
i'm trying to recompile the httpd rpm on a x86_64 system. all i've
changed in the spec file is the "--with-suexec-docroot" configure
option. the error message i get from the "rpmbuild -ba SPECS/httpd.spec"
command is "ln: creating symbolic link
`/var/tmp/httpd-root/etc/httpd/logs' to `../../usr/var/log/httpd': No
such file or directory". so
2015 Mar 16
4
Re: Can't create any KVM template due to the error with libguestfs
libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64
upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64
atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch
redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch
plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64
patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64
bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64
cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64
ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64
libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64
2017 Sep 12
3
Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?
On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay <alan.mckay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything.
>> Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year.
>>
>> Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6?
>>
>> I am