CentOS announce - May 2009 - CESA-2009:1075 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 httpd Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1075 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
b46184784e95094390c99e7446ffdcb0  httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
c28724e79e533d05769ef0ff5c9935d1  httpd-devel-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
ac4c38c74d7cac046eaaf189f4d56040  httpd-manual-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
2ea2dc52bd821d3f68d3b7cd9e0d56a5  mod_ssl-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm

Source:
86b1026d8b71cc651f819efdb2267771  httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

On Thu, 28 May 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1075 Moderate
>
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1075.html
>
> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
> syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
>
> i386:
> b46184784e95094390c99e7446ffdcb0  httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
Does the test version (2.2.8) have these backported in them already?
If not, are these exploits local or global? Can i just update mod_ssl to 
alleviate the problem if I have 2.2.8? More than willing to go back to 
2.2.3 if needed. Just trying to save a little work since 2.2.8 has run 
very well for me.

*******************************************************************************
Gilbert Sebenste                                                     ********
(My opinions only!)                                                  ******
*******************************************************************************