similar to: Samba 3.0.37 Performance issue

> > Message: 19 > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:17:32 -0800 > To: Martin Rootes <M.J.Rootes@shu.ac.uk> > Cc: Samba <Samba@lists.samba.org> > Subject: Re: Severe problem with Samba > From: jra@samba.org (Jeremy Allison) > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:08:03PM +0000, Martin Rootes wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > we are experiencing severe

Dear All, we are experiencing severe problems with Samba 2.2.0 (with quota support) running on a dual processor (400MHz) Sun E450 running Solaris 2.7. This is used as a central file server for student diskspace, accessed by approx 1200 PCs running NT 4. Up until recently we experienced some, what we assume to be, loading issues with connections during the middle of the day being slow.

We have a Sun v890, and I''m interested converting existing ZFS zpool from c#t#d# to MPxIO. % zpool status pool: data state: ONLINE status: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jul 15 10:58:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0

Dear All, we've been having some intermittent problems with students who's home directories are on a Sun E450 running Samba 2.0.6. I'm not totally convinced that the problem is caused by the server, but may be the network. However, I've had a look at the log.smb file and I'm seeing some error messages that I've not come across before: [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0]

Dear All, We are seeing the following warning messages in event logs on PCs that are accessing a Samba server (Solaris 2.7, samba 2.0.6):- 03/03/04/2001,14:44:04,Rdr,Warning,None,3025,N/A,CIS-C033-04,A write-behind operation has failed to the remote server ilex. The data contains the amount requested to write and the amount actually written. What does this message actually mean? Does it

I've just come across a problem that had me baffled for a bit. We supply students with diskspace via a Solaris machine running Samba (2.0.6). Yesterday, I got a report that a couple of students could not access their diskspace, although at login time the drive was getting mapped. The problem was that if they tried to view the contents of the directory (explorer or dir) the process would

Hi, We are running Samba on Solaris 10 cluster as a HA service. There are two nodes in the cluster and Samba versions are 3.5.8 on other node and 3.5.5 on another. Samba build is one that ships with Solaris 10. We are using Sun (Oracle) LDAP for user account data so passwd and group databases related information is retrieved from there. Authentication is done against Windows 2008 AD. This Samba

Hi. I have a simple (I think) question My dataset have these variables: names(data) [1] "v1" "v2" "v3" "v4" "v5" "v6" "v7" "v8" "v9" "v10" "v11" "v12" "v13" "v14" "v15" "v16" "v17"

Hi gurus, I was playing with zfs in a V890 before it was installed for production. We reinstalled it for production, but the 4 disks We used to play with zfs have a non standard format (slices comes from s0 to s8 not s2 for backup s7 does not exists) We need to recover those 4 disks to be used by Solaris Volume Manager. I know this would be an easy question, but I was trying to fix it

This question is concerning ZFS. We have a Sun Fire V890 attached to a EMC disk array. Here''s are plan to incorporate ZFS: On our EMC storage array we will create 3 LUNS. Now how would ZFS be used for the best performance? What I''m trying to ask is if you have 3 LUNS and you want to create a ZFS storage pool, would it be better to have a storage pool per LUN or combine the 3

We've been having some problems where connections are being lost to our 2.0.4b Samba machine, the specifics of which are in a different post. To add to the problems we find there is a problem with particularly Word and also some other programs, with the file in memory getting corrupted when the connection is lost. If a user loads a Word document from there Samba share and then the

Hi, I recently compiled dovecot-2.1.1 on Solaris 10 with Sun Studio, but when I want to compile Sieve for this version (dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole-0.3.0) I get an error: "sieve.c", line 578: identifier redeclared: sieve_multiscript_run and I see that declaration in sieve.h is different from definition in sieve.c, so compilation process fails with SunStudio cc compiler. I have done a

Dear All, I'm running SAMBA 2.0.5a on a Sun 450 running Solaris 7. In the past I've had an occasional problem with processes running amok and causing the server to grind to a halt, which I've put down to network glitches as they seemed to coincide with problems on the network. But today I've had 3 instances where the number of smbd processes has just steadily increased until

I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on a E450 running Solaris 7 which acts as a diskspace server for students, normally everything runs quite smoothly with numbers of connections in the region of about 800/900. Then every now and again students will start seeing their connections being lost and others will not get a connection when they log in, looking at the system shows no obvious problems, except

This thread reveals that R has some holes in the solution of some of the linear algebra problems that may arise. It looks like Jim Ramsay used a quick and dirty approach to the generalized eigenproblem by using B^(-1) %*% A, which is usually not too successful due to issues with condition of B and making a symmetric/Hermitian problem unsymmetric. In short, the problem is stated as follows:

Hello Jeremy and samba maintainers, I am using Samba 3.0.37 and I am confused about the license. On one hand both the COPYING file in the 3.0.37 tarball and your website indicates that version 3.0.37 is GPLv2. http://news.samba.org/announcements/samba_gplv3/ On the other hand, in the 3.0.37 tarball, there are many files with GPLv3 headers without any exception. For instance, several file in

I am getting these errors running: sh makepkg.sh can anyone help? ===============================================? root# ?sh makepkg.sh Distribution base:? /var/tmp/samba-3.0.37 Temp install dir:?? /tmp/samba-3.0.37-build Install directory:? /opt/samba mkdir: Failed to make directory "/tmp/samba-3.0.37-build"; File exists make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target

Hi, I have eight vectors that I would like to orthogonalize preferably using R. The vectors are of considerable length, however due to their nature I know they satisfy the conditions needed to apply the Gram-Schmidt algorithm. Before I embark on some R coding, I wanted to check that there is no facility / function already around that computes the orthogonalized set of vectors? I have performed

I was offered an upgrade path for my two Dell 1750's (2.8 Dual Xeon) to get into a pair of new Dual Core Dual Opteron servers. Assuming I can get the IRQ BS worked out so my TE411XP doesn't flip out, this should be a pretty significant upgrade. Has anyone been able to quantify any benefits to using one processor over the other? Should I wait for the newer Intel processors this summer

This thread pointed out that the "plain vanilla" library for linear algebra outperformed the fancy ones for the original poster -- and he had mentioned this, but still got "you ought to ...." advice that was inappropriate and ignored his stated experience. I've been surprised sometimes myself with performance results, and I'm now getting wary of making pronouncements.