similar to: Strange permission problem when mounting a share

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

hello, Le 23/10/2019 ? 12:45, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 23/10/2019 10:51, nathalie ramat via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have an server ad? - everything seems ok >> I have a windows client and a linux client . The users must to >> connect on windows or on linux with the same home. >> >> when I join my client linux with the command net

Hi, This patch fixes "Samba Bugzilla Bug 999". The last version (2.6.8.1) of smbfs kernel module do not honor uid, gid, file_mode and dir_mode supplied by user during mount. This bug is also logged as "Kernel Bug Tracker Bug 3330". I think this stuff is related to the "unix extensions". This patch offers to the client side the opportunity to decide to use or

Hi there. I'm using samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 on CentOS release 5.7 x86_64 to mount a Terastation filesystem. The "file_mode" and "dir_mode" options to mount.cifs seem to be ignored; I systematically get a "drwxrwxrwx" permission, no matter what values I provide for these options: # mount.cifs //terastation/Backup /bkp/BackupPC/ -o

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting

Hello, I have the following in /etc/samba/smbfstab; //msserver/share /mnt/smb-share cifs file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,credentials=/etc/cifsusers/admin,rw However, when using 'mount /mnt/smb_dir' I get; mount: can't find /mnt/smb_dir in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab Using 'mount -a' doesn't mount either. If I use "smbmount /mnt/smb_dir" I get; Could not

Hi all, I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share. Easy or so I thought. As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set files group writable, however when I create a file from the client I'm always getting the mode 0644. Does anyone have a clue why? Thanks! client:

Hi, I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s fstab entry is : //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates

I'm sure asterisk would make a great stand alone voice mail server. Basically I want to get rid of our voice mail system and replace it with *, but the problem is we use a cisco cluster with skinny clients. So I was thinking the way to contact a * server, would be through our 3640. But so far any attempt has failed. I am wondering if anyone has done something similar. Just want to verify the

Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0 day: 0 When the share is initially mounted: CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers CIFS VFS: Send error

Hallo, I've just installed Kernel 2.6.25.2 - works fine. But now when I use "smbmount" for mounting shares from my Win9x clients the system (kernel) tells me smbfs is deprecated and will be removed from the 2.6.27 kernel. Please migrate to cifs. But at least Win9x seems not to like cifs. Mounting via smbfs works since years, mounting (with the same options) via cifs

Hi, I have no issues uncompressing Linux kernel tarball on the samba share but getting Permission denied while compilation. What could cause this issue? init/calibrate.o: Permission deniedinit/calibrate.o: failedmake[1]: *** [init/calibrate.o] Error 1make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC fs/autofs/inode.ofs/autofs/init.o: Permission deniedfs/autofs/init.o: failedmake[2]: ***

Hi! I'm having trouble accessing Samba shares via autofs. Let me begin by saying that I can access the samba shares directly using smbclient without any trouble. For example: smbclient //Matsa/Pisi works fine. I first started out by copying a config line from an older system (redhat 7) that has in its auto.misc: (all on one line, of course) pisi

Hello, when i compiled latest linux 2.6.4 kernel source with gcc 3.3.2 on Linux/x86, i got a few warnings about varaibles beeing compared against constants where the range of the variable is so that the expression is always constant. The explicit comparison has to do with the code for high-uid and gid sheme. attached you will find a diff which does eliminate this error message by introducing an

Well, apparently there WAS a change on the Windows Server, which only affected new samba versions I was able to fix my issue by using this patch: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12776 Can this be officially fixed please? >-----Original Message----- >From: Lange Norbert >Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 10:04 >To: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Smbclient cant

Jeremy Allison via samba composed on 2020-04-23 09:24 (UTC-0700): > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:59:18AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: >> Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: >> CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 > nlink should never be zero. If an SMB server > returns that, then the CIFSFS client will have > to fake it to 1 at least.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

I need to mount a samba share as mode 777, so all users can read/write/delete/create. I have this as fstab entry //host/public /mnt/home smbfs auto,uid=user,umask=000,defaults,username=Perkins,password= see, i've had to put uid=user just to get it owned by user user, so i could edit files i put mode=777, but it does nothing. i want to let all users read/write/create/delete

Hello, I have Samba set up on FreeBSD with a share for guests. I don't need or want any authentication for this share. [test2] path = /data/test2 read only = No create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes The file permission on the host directory was set to 2777 and nobody:nobody. When a windows machine writes to the dir the permissions look fine. For example,

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address