similar to: locking.tdb size

Hi, I've noticed that locking.tdb file grows over time. This happened while running the following test: - delete locking.tdb and restart samba - connect a linux client using cifs mount -run the following script on the client: #!bin/bash for i in `seq 1 130000`;do echo $i echo === KB_rand=$(((RANDOM % 300 + 1)*(1000)) dd

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

Ralf Hildebrandt reported[0] the following messages on ext3-users: name_count maxed, losing inode data: dev=00:05, inode=5221 because the filesystem in question is indeed ext3. However, this warning is not generated by ext3 code but by the audit framework. While the origins of these messages are discussed elsewhere[1] the following patch modifies the printks in question so that users know

Hello all, I am new to the list, but I have been using ferret for a little bit already. I would first like to thank Dave for all his work on ferret. I had a few questions that I haven''t been able to figure out after messing around with ferret and going through the documentation. StemFilter ------ I am trying to improve the quality of my searches in context of the content of my

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs. All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them. Here are the results, no graphs - sorry: http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/ Reiserfs

Hi! Technical description below, but the exec summary is: Yes, we have a performance problem with gencache. On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a midsize AD domain with some 50k users but only 100 workstations > joined. > > Sometimes I find server CPU throttling at 100%. In order to let it drop Can you find out

Not having paid any attention, I discovered that this file grew to be 1048518656 bytes (this on a debian-based Linux system), and filled up the (small) filesystem for /var. Is there a 'normal' size that I should expect for this file ? What could be the reason for the large size? And how could it be best reduced? (There was a suggestion of stopping samba, removing the file, and

Hi all, I was trying to mount root-partition which is ext3 partition with noatime and ro option. I included "ro" in the kernel command line But for mounting it with "noatime" option when I searched for some solution I came across a patch http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/5/38 But after applying this patch and including option "noatime" in

Hi everyone, I've just finished doing a generation loss test using ffmpeg on the following codecs at 96kbps: - AAC (libfdk_aac) - Opus (libopus) - Vorbis (libvorbis) I wanted to see what which codec is best to use for sites like YouTube were content is often uploaded and downloaded, edited, then uploaded again in cycles. The results are mildly interesting: AAC was still passable by 10

Hello ext3-users, we have an oopsy situation here: we have 4 machines: 3 client nodes, 1 master: the master holds a fairly big repository of small files. The repo's current size is ~40GB with ~1.2 M files in ~100 directories. Now, we like to rsync changes from the master to the client nodes, which is working perfectly for 2 nodes, but our 3rd node oopses "sometimes", rendering

Hi all, I recently did a run where I built clang executables on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT [1], from trunk r250000 (2015-10-11) all through r327700 (2018-03-16), with increments of 100 revisions. This is mainly meant as an archive, for easily doing bisections, but there are also some interesting statistics. From r250000 through r327700: * the total (stripped) executable size grew by approximately 43% *

Thanks for raising this. This is something we've recently been looking at too at Sony, as over the course of PS4's lifetime so far we've seen our clang executable on Windows approximately double in size, which isn't ideal for things like distributed build systems. A graph of clang.exe size on our internal staging branch matches yours closely with it being more of a death by a

> On Mar 17, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Craig Topper via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time a single instruction appears on a line by itself like this in a scheduler model: > > def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup2], (instregex "ANDNPDrr")>; > > It causes that instruction to be its own

I just knocked ~400k off the size of the x86 scheduler tables by reducing from 5k+ entries to 2k+ entries per cpu. ~Craig On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 17, 2018, at 4:04 PM, Craig Topper via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time

I was writing this to beta9 announcement, but it grew so huge that I guess a separate mail is better. :) I've spent quite a lot of time this last week redesigning/rewriting Squat indexer. I think the redesign is good enough now that I'll just replace the existing squat with this new one in next release. I don't think many people are using the old squat, and there are also some bugs in

Hello all, I've a cluster with an oracle database. The shared filesystem is provided from a SAN and there's LVM and ext3 fs. I've experienced some problem. During a normal switch of my cluster remounting FS on second node gave me problem. FS is corrupted. During a normal switch, operations done are: - oracle shutdown abort - oracle listernet shutdown - umount fs (using umount -l )

I'm sure the x86 scheduler models are causing bloat. Every time a single instruction appears on a line by itself like this in a scheduler model: def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup2], (instregex "ANDNPDrr")>; It causes that instruction to be its own group in the generated output. And its replicated for each CPU. We should look into better using regular expressions or taking

Hey Guys We are replacing a BM4 with a trixbox (asterisk) virtual numbers as the customer wants to move the callcentre. They are asking for an equiv to the ipview I gather HUD may be or the panel view The problem is that we need to see (a) total calls in the queue (b) calls for specific DID - How can you give 1 DID preference to another DID ie DID 61740410001 = Fred Electrical DID

Hello everyone, Sorry for the long post, but I?d like to propose something to the group. I''d like to see if there is interest in working on a collaborative project (eventually a set of projects as things grow), that will a) Give everyone more experience in working on some of these new technologies, b) The ability to go as cutting-edge as possible), and c) Share in the