similar to: Automounting DFS path published shares under RHEL 5 with Samba?

Hi, is it possible, to use DFS and show the correct values of free space? I set up a DFS-share located on filesystem1 (size 50GB) and linked shares of another server to this share (msdfs:<fs>\share): share1: size 110TB share2: size 50TB share3: size 20TB But connecting to the DFS-share, the disk size of this network drive ist 50GB. Unfortunately files larger than 50GB can not be copied

I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the following is possible I need 2 Samba Shares for example share1 and share2, both sharing an identical location, however I want once PC to connect using share1 and everyone else to use share2 so far so good this works. However, at 1am in the morning I want to stop share2 and disconnect users whilst not effecting access via share1. Then at 2am restart share2.

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba

Hi list! I've read some remarks here and in other places that it would be good practice to not edit the smb.conf file directly but rather keep a smb.conf.master file, edit that and then do a testparm -s > smb.conf. Here comes my problem: My smb.conf file uses some include statements. When using testparm those include lines are still in the output directly followed by the content of the

running debian 3.1 "sarge" ppc and samba 3.08 I want to have my win98se computer users to have their shares automatically mapped. 1. I have read that I would use a netlogin directory and put scripts in there? 2. Does anyone know if samba has to be set up a special way ADS, wins, etc... to use the netlogin directory and it's scripts? "this server is the only smb server

A sysadmin moved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access

I encountered strange behaviour of "msdfs" when using together with "netbios aliases". E.g I have in smb.conf: [global] netbios name = server netbios aliases = server-oldname .... host msdfs = Yes [share1] path = /var/samba/share1 [share2] msdfs root = Yes msdfs proxy = \penguin\share2 .... From a windows (XP) machine I can now see: \\server\share1 and

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10. I currently have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads' for improved authentication. I have one snag, though... I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain that is not in my control. There is no trust relationship at all. If I use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid

List, I'm having trouble accessing shares, and I'm getting conflicting indications on whether I've successfully joined the domain with my PC and Samba server (which may bear on the share problem). I really could use some help; I've not been able to recognize anything in the docs or via Google that helps. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.21a, and I'm trying to

Hello, Is the example for 'copy' ( https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html ) valid? [template] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = andy, dave, jay When I'm trying a similar configuration, I can't log in and I have this message in log.smbd: WARNING: No path in service template - making it unavailable! It seems I need to add a path: [template]

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would like to get add a new Wiki entry regarding Automounting with HAL for CentOS 5, since the behaviour is very different than CentOS 4. Main points: - - Making automounting hotpluggable devices work with other WMs - - Overriding the default mount point - - Overriding the default mount options (noexec etc) Small nightmare here to find out how

Good morning. I am using samba 3.0 on RedHat Linux 9.0 and Linux machine is having lot of users and groups . I am trying to solve a problem. I have created, for example, 10 shares ( each share is having different valid users and groups ) and I can access only 4 of them (I have rights to read or write only for 4 shares). Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not

Matthias, Sorry I should have wrote more details. I agree with your message and I understand that template12 is not meant to be a share. What I tried to say is: when I have this configuration: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = alex [alex] path = /home/alex copy = template12 I can see this error in /var/log/samba/log/smbd [2016/04/25 16:44:14.719192,

Most of you will probably think about this "It's not a real problem". But not my boss. I want to exchange our Netware server with a linux/SMABA one but my boss wants to have on the new server exactly the same directories structure like in the Netware server. And here it is what I couldn't done : user X wich have two secondary groups Y and Z must browse in Win95 _only_ the Y and

Hello all, I have an NFS Server where I want give access to a specific address to a specific path. Problem is that I have some other shares active which I do not want the specific IP to not access it. The /etc/exports looks like the following: /nfs/Share1??? ??? ???? 10.10.*(rw) /nfs/Share2?? ? ??????? 10.10.*(rw) /kdnbckp/CS21?????????? 10.10.193.43(rw) The client on the last line (IP