similar to: Windows 7 problem accessing domain member samba server on different subnet

We recently ran into a similar issue. If you have any microsoft "Live" components installed on your 7 box, samba servers must be contacted by numeric IP address rather than netbios (or even IP mnemonic) name. http://www.sevenforums.com/network-sharing/8303-cant-connect-samba-share-via -name-ip-works.html ---------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network

On 6/28/2018 9:20 AM, Elias Pereira wrote: > Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! > > For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to > the closet site to a DC > > > Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote: >

Hi guys! Do you known if there is something to do to let samba 4 member server to work in a different subnet? My AD/DC is on subnet 10.40.11.0/24 and im putting an member File server at 10.4.16.2/24 But im having problem to join in DC with this member. I have other members in the same ad subnet and all of them are working well. Thanks! -- ------------------------------------------- Edson

Hi This is my first post so please be gentle! Many thanks to the developers of Samba, I?ve used it for years and it is a great system! I?m running Samba Version 3.6.6 on a raspberry Pi for testing purposes before using in anger and a Linux PC! I only need the functionality of WINS for my application for XP and Win7 clients, my PCs won?t be on a domain. I use a separate DHCP server that dishes

Hi, Guus I referre to the two separate tinc process/network(received same subnet), not Sunbet selection within one tinc process/network. My understanding is if different tinc process comes with exact subnet, as they are not related with each other(they have no idea regarding weights with each other), I guess the routing depends on the host's main routing table, for specific route it depends

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:21:11AM +0800, Bright Zhao wrote: > Two tinc networks/daemons, and received same subnet from the two daemons, how tinc will choose which one is preferred? And the weight settings in each daemon for subnet will or will not be the judge? If you use weights for Subnets, then the Subnet with the lowest weight will be chosen, unless the node that owns that Subnet is

Hi all, I'm gearing up to merge our two domains into one, across subnets. I have subnet browsing working now. I have a couple questions: 1. Right now, the second PDC (which will become the member server) shares a printer via its own CUPS server. Will my users see a performance degradation if that printer starts being shared by the other PDC across the subnet? Would it be OK for this

> I'm using something similar to Amazon's VPCs, where a logical group of > instances has a local subnet from the cloud provider. This local subnet > is always 10.0.0.0/24. As there are multiple VPC's, these private local > subnets dont collide. I do not know what Amazon does, and it looks like I do not want to know it :-) Am I correct? web, gateway and backup have NO

Hi everybody I installed 2 subnets, one with a samba PDC fully functional and the other with just one linux client (called CLIENTE) with samba running a basic configuration. Subnet 1 has a samba PDC called BAR (domain FOOBAR with ip 192.168.1.1) that is also the wins server for both subnets and the domain master browser for 192.168.1.0/24 bar:/var/log/samba # smbclient

-----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mohammed Firdosh Nasim Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:08 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to register two SIP phones ( e.g. WindowsMessenger) from different subnet to * On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 07:42, Luki wrote: >

Hi All, I have two SIP softphones(Windows Messenger) running on different subnet (Phone-1 on IP XXX.XXX.25.ABC & Phone-2 on IP XXX.XXX.15.XYZ) and my Asterisk Server is running on IP XXX.XXX.25.PQR.Because of some security issues both the subnets are completely isolated ( U cant even PING from one to other) and I want to connect Phone-1 & Phone-2 to the *. How can I proceed? Please

Hai Thomas.   Its not that hard to get a good 4.4.3. here is how to do this. And is really easy, as long you dont run into compile problems. I’ve tested below in debian jessie, and should work on ubuntu also.   The short/simple rebuild a samba version from debian jessie to ubuntu.   ## 1 ## Get the packages needed for a rebuild. sudo apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On 8.2.19. 22:39, albi wrote: >>> The setup looks like this: >>> web <- tinc "tiosp" -> gateway <- tinc "tiutl" -> backup > Which lan ips do all your computers have? network addess will be fine. > > > ALBI... Hi Albi, web:   tinc tiosp: 172.16.1.10   local: 10.0.0.5 gateway:   tinc tiutl: 172.16.0.5   tinc tiosp: 172.16.1.5   local:

Hello everybody, I hope someone can help me with this or point me into the right direction since I am not being able to solve it since weeks. Since last year I was running Samba 4.1.6 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS without issues as a active directory domain controller as well as member servers. Trouble started with the upgrade to Samba 4.3.8 (now 4.3.9). The ADS controller and most member servers are

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:26:54PM +0000, Martin wrote: > I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not > route smaller segments than /48 > If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get > network unreachable > However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine > > Is this is a limitation in

Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to the closet > site to a DC Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/27/2018 11:44 AM, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Reading about, specifically in the wiki

You have a typo in your routes: fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/6 abcd vs. adcd On 21 May 2015, at 19:35, Martin <martinmoen at gmail.com<mailto:martinmoen at gmail.com>> wrote: I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024

Two tinc networks/daemons, and received same subnet from the two daemons, how tinc will choose which one is preferred? And the weight settings in each daemon for subnet will or will not be the judge?

Hello all, The prob is solved. The dns-answer only seemed to come from the asked nameserver. Between the two endpoints of the vpn the gateways have a transparent dns-proxy which forwarded my dns-request not the wanted dns-server but sent not-found-answers pretending to be the intended ns. Not easy to find such a pitfall :( Thanks again, -Peter -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter