similar to: Issues with default ACLs in created objects not including parent's owner: old bug or setup issue?

(please note that this mail is crossposted to 3 lists. No need to CC me to answers, I read the 3 of them...) Some users (including me with my professionnal hat) want to use 3.5 versions of samba on production servers running Debian. Of course, most of the time, these production servers are running Debian lenny (the stable version of the distribution). Debian lenny ships with samba 3.2.5, so

After several months of testing in the "experimental" branch of Debian, samba 3.2.0 was uploaded to Debian "unstable" as of July 20th 2008 and entered the "testing" branch of the distribution as of August 1st. As the "testing" branch is the future stable release of the Debian distribution, this means that Samba 3.2.0 will be in the upcoming release of

Hi, i visited wiki.samba.org and read the "Release Planning for Samba 3.2" information and the "Release Planning for Samba 3.3" information. So my question is: Is samba 3.2 development stopped and all concentration given to Samba 3.3 ? Because there isnt any further release note available for 3.2, but instead there are some notes for 3.3 ? Bye and thanks for your

I'm currently building a Samba3-based domain (DomA) that has a trust relationship with an existing production NT4 domain (DomB). DomA uses an LDAP backend. The LDAP server is local on the PDC and is dedicated to such use. DomA runs Samba 3.5.6 on Debian 6.0. DomB is an old-timer: NT4 domain that's running for ages. The trust relationship has been established: DomA trusts DomB. Clients

Quoting Karolin: > Release Announcements > ===================== > > > This is the first stable release of Samba 3.4. As of yesterday, Samba 3.4.0 is now available in Debian unstable. It means that the next release of Debian (codename "squeeze", due out...when it's ready, probably around the end of 2010) will have at least this version. Besides everything

I'm setting up a debian squeeze file server with NFS mounted home directories and authentication via ldap. Now I want to give Windows users access to those same home directories. I thought I'd try samba4. I figure I have nothing to lose since this is a virtual machine and if I don't like the results, I can just restore from a snapshot. Its not a production machine yet. I'd

I think that there are no qdiscs that permit to drop the oldest frame of a queue when this queue is full, but I would like to be wrong: bfifo drops arriving frames when the max queue length is reached. red also drops arriving frames in a more elaborate fashion, with a drop probability that increases above a limit and becomes a drop certitude when the max queue length is reached. sfq drops

Hi, I have shared one of my mailboxes to another user providing him full rights to that mailbox. $ doveadm acl get -u user1 doc ID Global Rights user=user2 admin create delete expunge insert lookup post read write write-deleted write-seen When that user creates a new mailbox within the shared mailbox, the

Package: xen-api Version: N/A Severity: normal Dear Debian maintainer, Hello, I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this package. I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf templates or modify the existing templates in a package or, if you prefer, to send a call for translations

On 05/28/2015 04:18 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/05/15 01:33, John Lewis wrote: >> On 05/26/2015 07:34 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 26/05/15 03:05, John Lewis wrote: >>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operations_%28FSMO%29_roles#Transfering_a_FSMO_role >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I ran into that

I''d like to implement something like SFQ, but with a cap of a rate per flow. Essentially, I''d like to be able to limit citrix connections to 30KBps without having an overall traffic flow cap for all citrix connections. Slightly preferable to this would be something that would actually work per flow instead of the stochastic algorithm. Is this possible? Thanks, Bill --

Hi, I am wondering if there is a simple way to plot MCF(mean cumulative function) for recurrent events in R? MCF (http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue57/relbasics57.htm) And do you have some other recommendation in visualize recurrent events? I did some research online. Some people use ggplot2 to plot MCF, but it requires some additional coding. http://user2010.org/slides/Shentu.pdf Your help

Hello list, I''m currently a bit planless so perhaps someone here could give me a point in the right direction. History: I wrote a shaper web tool (http://shaper.netshadow.at) and now got several feature requests if it would be possible to graph "what''s going on" (this mean per IP address, tcp/udp ports or protocols) in a specific chain. A chain represents a specific

HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, if you want to see comparative test results, go to http://www.rawsoft.org at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for a sharing test and a burst test. You will see that both qdisc are good. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

The day after Karolin announced the release of 3.2.0-pre3, the Debian packaging team was able to upload .deb packages for it in Debian *experimental*. To use them, you need to already use Debian testing or unstable, then add this to /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free (replace "fr" by your favorite mirror country code) If you

Colleagues, Using R2.7.0 in OS X, I am having trouble understanding the command textConnection. My situation is as follows: 1. I am trying to read a lengthy file (45000 lines) that has headers ~ every 1000 lines. read.table (or its variants) fail because of the recurrent headers. 2. My present approach is the following: a. use readLines to read the file, save as an array b. use grep

Hello, I have a cohort with approx 1,200 patients at the ages of 30-65 that had their first myocardial infarction during 1992: · They were in a follow up until 2005. · About 400 of them died during this period of time (right censored) · Each one of them had up to 4 mi recurrent events. I am using the semi-parametric model in order to assess the relationship of

About two months ago our sysadmin upgraded to samba 2.2.7 and we have not had any oplock problems since. A heartfelt thanks from the University of Wisconsin in Madison to the Samba team for all their hard work. If our hundreds of users understood what was going on behind the scenes, they'd be thanking you too. --- Sam Barasch Computer Systems Support Department of Biostatistics

Hello, Trying to compile Samba 3.2.15 on a RHEL AS 4u2 (i686) and I'm getting the following result from 'sh makerpms.sh': > Provides: samba-doc = 3.2.15-1 > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 > > > RPM build errors: > File not found:

I am trying to analyse recurrent failure times using survfitr from the survrec package. To do this, I need to "Create a survival recurrent object" using Survr. But, when I do this, I get an error "Error in Survr(r1d[, 1], r1d[, 5], r1d[, 6]) : data doesn't match". Here, r1d[,1] is the identifier for each case, r1d[,5] is the time of recurrence, r1d[,6] is the status