Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "oplocks failed if user is not the owner of the file?"
2011 Apr 27
2
multiple comparisons on a between factor
Dear list,
im facing an issue of statistical data analysis that I consider myself
unable to resolve in R so i hope to get some valuable insights from you. i
run an ANOVA with four factors; factor4 is an between factor (two different
groups measured), the others are withins (tested across /all/ subjects).
accordingly, my model looks as follows:
fm1
1999 Dec 10
2
[David Huggins-Daines <dhd@plcom.on.ca>] Bug#52414: ssh-add uses ssh-askpass, but ssh doesn't
Damien,
Here's a forwarded bug for you.
Cheers, Phil.
--[[message/rfc822]]
Subject: Bug#52414: ssh-add uses ssh-askpass, but ssh doesn't
Reply-To: David Huggins-Daines <dhd at plcom.on.ca>, 52414 at bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: David Huggins-Daines <dhd at plcom.on.ca>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Philip Hands <phil at hands.com>
2005 Jan 24
3
Dialing Delay
Hello, When I dial out there is a long delay in dialing. Is this normal?
Thanks,
David
2010 Aug 02
1
QQ-plot – Axes
I would like to change the position of the major tick marks in my qq-plot?
Right now the ticks are set at 5.5, 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0.
I would like them to be at 5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 6.0, 6.2, 6.4, 6.8 and 7.0. So I
would have to remove some of the present ticks. So far I can only add ticks
to the plot with:
axis(1,at=c(5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 6.0, 6.2, 6.4, 6.8, 7.0))
Is there a solution to my
2010 Oct 05
1
Tukey HSD Test als Post Hoc Test nach einem GLM inkl. Anova
Hallo,
zur Analyse von Daten zum Artenreichtum von Pflanzen, habe ich ein Glm (glm)
und anschlie?end eine Anova (anova) durchgef??hrt. Nun m??chte ich f??r die
signifikanten Einflussfaktoren einen Post Hoc Tukey Test durchf??hren, um zu
ermitteln in wie weit die einzelnen Faktorstufen sich signifikant
voneinander unterscheiden.
Mit dem Befehl (TukeyHSD) komme ich nicht
2010 Jul 21
1
"lmomRFA" package: error bounds/confidence intervals
Dear List
I?m using the ?lmomRFA? package to fit different distributions to my data
sample. To calculate the error bounds I used:
regsimq(?)
and
sitequantbounds(?)
So my questions are:
Are error bounds and confidence intervals the same thing?
And: Does
regsimq(? boundprob = c(0.05, 0.95))
calculate the 90 or the 95% confidence interval?
If error bounds and confidence intervals are
2011 Jan 17
1
intercept point coordinates
Hi List,
Can someone help me to calculate the coordinates of the red and green points? In this
example I found their approximate location by trying, but as I have to analyse
many similar curves, I?d rather calculate the exact location.
data<-
c(0.008248005, 0.061242387, 0.099095516, 0.189943027, 0.227796157, 0.258078661,
0.280790538, 0.303502416, 0.386779301, 0.454914934, 0.545762445,
2010 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Running "make check" on Windows yields lots of unwarrented unexpected failures
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" background="https://img.web.de/v/p.gif" class="bgRepeatYes" style="background-repeat: repeat; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: verdana,geneva; font-size: 9pt; padding-left: 0px;"><div style="min-height: 200px; background-image: url(https://img.web.de/v/p.gif); background-repeat:
2017 Feb 12
5
Samba4 Problem Rename
I've got a Problem using samba4 as PDS and Win7 Client.
I'm not able to rename a file in Windows Explorer. I can connect shares.
I can create, open and write files but I cannot rename or move them. If
i try to i get a message "file xyz too big for target file system".
I googled a lot but I do not find any helpfull thread with this issue.
Is there anybody who can help me with
2006 Jan 04
4
Trying to delay for oplocks twice
We have a lot of
[2006/01/04 18:44:40, 0] smbd/open.c:open_file_ntcreate(1355)
Trying to delay for oplocks twice
in the logs. Do they harm in general?
And only in one single case I got this, don't know if I ever will get it
reproduced, so maybe not related and happened by accident:
Samba version 3.0.21a
PID Username Group Machine
2009 Aug 20
0
No subject
leave it for another day to be sure.
> It would help running the driver in debug mode
>
> /path/to/usbhid-ups -DDD -a upsname
>
> The interesting parts will have 'HIDGetDataValue' in them and a few
> lines before that will tell us which report it attempted to retrieve.
I've done that and included the syslog output in the same file. The
logfile is attached and
2016 Sep 16
3
Upgrade to 4.5 error (SLES 12 SP1)
Hi,
i upgrade to sles sp1 with sernet packages and get the following error after upgrade. Its looks like that port 135 will not reached.
Anyone who have an information about that or a solution?
Thanks
Sven
orion:~ # samba-tool drs showrepl
Failed to connect host 192.168.24.2 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
Failed to connect host 192.168.24.2 (orion.domain.local) on port 135 -
2008 May 14
3
[Fwd: File Locking and Permissions Issue]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: File Locking and Permissions Issue
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:10:28 -0700
From: Jack Lauman <jlauman@nwcascades.com>
Organization: nwcascades.com
To: mailto:samba@lists.samba.org
I'm trying to get Lacerte 2007 Tax Accounting software working on a
Samba v3.0.28a based server. When one user is logged in it works fine.
When two or more users
2006 Jul 05
0
Oplocks not taking place at all unless fake oplocks = yes - Update
I've modified the contention limit in attempt to troubleshoot this, thinking that perhaps the client may be requesting multiple oplocks for whatever reason. The client is still not getting an oplock without specifying 'fake oplocks = yes'. I'm open to any ideas for troubleshooting. I've also checked to see if oplocks are explicitly disabled on the client, and they are not.
2006 Jun 29
0
Oplocks not taking place at all unless fake oplocks = yes
Hi folks I'm running two Samba servers. One is on Ubuntu 5.10
(samba-3.0.14a-6ubuntu1), the other is SuSE Linux Enterprise Server
(samba-3.0.20b-3.4). The Ubuntu box is on my local network, and the
SLES box is across a WAN with an intervening WAFS appliance with TCP
acceleration.
Neither set-up seems to grant an oplock to the client unless I turn on
'fake oplocks'. I've set
2023 Jan 24
1
oplocks, kernel oplocks, kernel share modes, .. - how it all works?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:33:57AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>@Michael: move the kernel oplocks setting to the global section, then things may start to work as expected.
>
>With kernel oplocks = yes in [global] but without mentioning
>smb2 leases, this thing behaves in a way similar to when setting
>smb2 leases to no (also globally, as it is a global parameter), --
>I see
2023 Jan 24
1
oplocks, kernel oplocks, kernel share modes, .. - how it all works?
24.01.2023 20:09, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:38:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
>>
>> Here we've two files open, with kernel oplocks = yes (hence it is LEASE(), -
>> before I enabled kernel oplocks, it was LEASE(RH) or LEASE(RWH)).
>
> Kernel oplocks do not support SMB2+ LEASES. So you're
> just seeing old
2023 Jan 20
2
oplocks, kernel oplocks, kernel share modes, .. - how it all works?
Hi!
I'm trying to understand how various ways to grant a file lease to (windows) clients
works. Especially in context when files are being modified locally on the linux
filesystem.
For example, there's this wording in man smb.conf:
kernel share modes
...
Kernel share modes provide a minimal level of interoperability with
local UNIX processes and NFS operations by
2006 Jul 06
2
SOLVED - Oplocks not taking place at all unless fake oplocks = yes
The kernel on my server appears to be refusing oplocks altogether. Setting 'kernel oplocks = no' resolved the issue. Is there any caveats I should be aware of?
- Chris Wagner
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-bounces+chriswagner=amyskitchen.net@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-bounces+chriswagner=amyskitchen.net@lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of Chris Wagner
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006
2023 Jan 24
2
oplocks, kernel oplocks, kernel share modes, .. - how it all works?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:29:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
>24.01.2023 20:22, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
>>What Samba version is this? This:
>>
>>>LEASE()
>>
>>... looks broken: the handle oplock/lease state claims to be a
>>lease, which means the client didn't request an oplock but a lease
>>which should not have happened in