similar to: Enforcing filesystem permissions

Dear all, trying to build some Heimdal-based packages for Samba AD DC under openSUSE I am facing some difficulties with the build system: During the installation which is triggered by "make install" waf complains about some task dependency cycle after leaving folder bin/default. Full log including config options can be seen unter https://build.opensuse.org/

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

Hi, I am testing share parameters, and have the following share definition: ## Section - [shareA] [shareA] path = /tmp/shareA writelist = user1 and do not understand why user1 cannot write files in the share when connected as user1. Unix permissions for the share files are rw for everyone, and the share directory has wide-open permissions. Samba version is 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE.

Am Sonntag, 14. Juli 2019, 22:10:10 CEST schrieb Johannes Engel: > Dear all, > > trying to build some Heimdal-based packages for Samba AD DC under > openSUSE I am facing some difficulties with the build system: > During the installation which is triggered by "make install" waf complains > about some task dependency cycle after leaving folder bin/default. > Full log

Hi I want to build samba-4.10.0 for SUSE openLeap 15.1. Config and make works fine but make install sucks: ./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64 --with-cachedir=/var/lib/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lib/samba/lock --with-logfilebase=/var/log/samba --with-modulesdir=/usr/lib64/samba --disable-rpath --disable-rpath-install

I have the following smb.conf file. Note the "guestaccount" parameter, and the guest parameters in shareA, shareB, and shareC. # # Generated by modify_samba_config.pl # [global] adminusers = Administrator, root logonhome = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile addsharecommand = /usr/local/autobench/sources/samba/util/modify_samba_config.pl

My WinXP client creates files and directories that are writable only by the file owner, not by the group to which that user belongs. There must be something all-too-obvious that I am overlooking here, but I'll be darned if I can find it. The files and directories can be read just fine, but I can't write to them. Clues? Help? Commiseration? Thanks, Jay -- When we are planning for

List, I'm having trouble accessing shares, and I'm getting conflicting indications on whether I've successfully joined the domain with my PC and Samba server (which may bear on the share problem). I really could use some help; I've not been able to recognize anything in the docs or via Google that helps. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.21a, and I'm trying to

Hai, sorry about the delay.. i had to do some work here.. in my global settings in smb.conf ## Acl-EA settings ea support = yes store dos attributes = yes map archive = no map hidden = no map system = no map readonly = no inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes map acl inherit = yes acl group control = yes

Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. Here is the initial journalctl results: Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc named[16080]: starting BIND 9.10.6-Debian <id:9d1ea0b> -f -u bind Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc

If everything fails try this. Is working form e even on a windows 8.1X64 client full patched in a samba 3.6 domain and Samba 4. Ans I run it on a ext3 glusterd replicating share without any issue First set the sticky bit for your group on that share [share] path= /yourpath posix locking =NO <--I need that for my gluster not shure you will readonly=no valid users = @yourusersgroup

Hello all, I have never had the need to use the "add user script" functionality but now I do. However, it does not seem to be working. My smb.conf entry is like so: add user script = /remote/configure_scripts/addusers.sh where addusers.sh is a bash script that reads in a text file of usernames, groups, and passwords and adds the users to /etc/passwd, /etc/group/ and

look at this thread. http://userssuck.com/2007/03/13/samba-file-permission-issue-with-microsoft-office/ try adding : posix locking = no >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: belle at bazuin.nl [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens L.P.H. van Belle >Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2015 16:53 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Excel and

ok.. and you did also a .. chmod -R 2770 /path/to/dir The folder you are share-ing also needs 2770 >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] >Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2015 13:45 >Aan: L.P.H. van Belle >CC: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Excel and Samba Problem > >I have try it but does not

Did you try fort he share: oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Februar

All SWAT local help hyperlinks produce a 404 File not found error. I'm using a new install of SuSE 10.0; SuSE 9.x did not have this problem. I have installed samba-doc. The page source of the Welcome to SWAT! page contains the following hyperlinks: <li><b>Daemons</b> <ul> <li><a href="/swat/help/manpages/smbd.8.html"

I think I inadvertently hijacked another thread when I posted this a couple days ago, so I''ll try again. :) For those who have developed apps that have different levels of account quotas in regards to total file upload space, how are you managing it? Are you keeping track of the total uploaded bytes in an Account model or are you using OS quota mechanisms? Any suggestions would be

Hello, I''m currently using the gem ''nested_set'' for comment threading. What I want to do is prevent the comment level from going more than 2 levels deep. What I tired doing was something like this: class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base .... before_save :ensure_max_nestedset_level private # We don''t want comments to go

This is a pretty uncontroversial patch which just allows the selinux=? and enforcing=? flags on the kernel command line to be controlled. Currently libguestfs unconditionally passes selinux=0. By default this patch does the same thing, but allows programs to enable SELinux in the kernel and/or set it to enforcing mode. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat

Do not attempt to relabel a guest in case its SELinux enforcing mode is not "enforcing", as it is either pointless, or it may fail because of an invalid policy configured. --- mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml b/mlcustomize/SELinux_relabel.ml index 647aeda..db00e59