Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "WINS unicast name restration storm"
2016 Feb 27
0
Error joining domain: tstream_npa_connect_recv to /run/samba/ncalrpc/np for pipe lsarpc
Hi guys
I have setup a NT4 Domain, using Freeipa as a ipasam backend...
Normal user authentication and shares seems to work, but i'm getting an error when trying to join a Windows 7 machine to the domain (see below)...
To me it seems to be the same error as here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11245....
Does anyone know if this patch have been implemented in the samba in
2008 May 17
1
nmbd using 80-90% cpu for name reg from phantom
nmbd is using a lot of cpu:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd
log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second::
[2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212)
process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request
received for name
2003 Jan 28
0
Probably a bug in samba audit
Hi.
I got this email-address from BUGS.txt file of the samba distribution.
I read it carefully.
I got configured and working samba, I work with samba above one year.
I still have a problem, and, according to the samba log output, I think
it's probably a bug.
When I try to use the shares with audit support, I have my Far
disconnected and telling me that something is wrong.
I have that
2002 Jul 25
0
winbind from samba 2.2.5, solaris 8
Hi,
today I have experienced some odd behavior of samba 2.2.5 on Solaris 8, SPARC.
the machine is an FSC Primepower 400, running solaris 8 with system locale to
english (us)
1.
My first problem is with german special charachters within nt user names
Let's assume I have an account named 'h?nig' (haenig)
# wbinfo -u
shows domain and account names of all configured domain users (inc.
1999 Jan 18
0
samba 2.0.0 wins registration error
I have a Solaris samba 2.0.0 box (zirconium) trying to join a workgroup.
But, the samba WINS server (medusa) complains:
[1999/01/18 07:18:02, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(672)
Netbios nameserver version 2.0.0 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998
[1999/01/18 07:18:24, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(406)
*****
Samba name server MEDUSA is now a local master browser for
1998 Oct 28
1
Question on force user & log messages
I am running samba on HP-UX 10.20 with clients on Win95.
I have two questions.
Where can I get more information on the force user parameter?
I am using it but am unable to get it to properly prompt for
a password when mapping it.
Next question deals with log messages in log.nmb. Where are these
two messages coming from and how do I get rid of them?
--IP address changed to XXX.XX.XX.XX
2007 Dec 10
1
Restrat server
I have this file in my lib directory that I am using to encrypt/decrypt
some stuff. While I am debugging it I have to contsantly start and
restart the server in order for the changes to take effect (or for them
to be recognized), why is that? Thanks,
-S
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are
2013 Aug 27
0
[Bug 795] RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation resulting in unicast reply
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795
Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com
AssignedTo|pablo at netfilter.org |netfilter-buglog at lists.netf
2015 Aug 04
1
UDP unicast network backend (QEMU)
In 2012 QEMU added UDP unicast network backend support
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b#diff-a0a1810b6e249e68f1a290e37399becb
Checked latest libvirt on the git repo, and didn't see this as an option.
So tried to use the mcast tunnel mode. I keep getting duplicate packets
with BPDUs and LLDP packets going between the Point to point connection
2003 Mar 01
0
Multicast/Unicast
also, does unicast individually send out streams to each listener (requiring lots of bandwidth) or does it broadcast a stream and users can "tap in" (low bandwidth)?
-------Original Message-------
From: "Dan Chokola (webmail)" <teckyd at earthlink.net>
Sent: 02/28/03 10:46 PM
To: icecast at xiph.org
Subject: [icecast] Multicast/Unicast
>
> what does icecast use?
2016 May 04
0
Unicast or Multicast?
you have 'a' doubt?
precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here?
this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software.
runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously
including shoutcast.
read the docs!
On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote:
> Hi, there!
> I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both.
> I
2016 May 04
0
Unicast or Multicast?
Good morning,
On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote:
> Hi, there!
> I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or
> both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found
> anything. Anyone can help me?
Icecast2 is a streaming solution that works using HTTP[0]. (HTTPS is
also supported using both methods[1].) HTTP uses TCP[2][3]
2016 May 04
0
Unicast or Multicast?
Hi buddylove,
In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading
which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between
multicast and unicast communications:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicast
Cheers,
Jordan
On 05/04/2016 06:39 AM, buddylove wrote:
> @Phil
> nice text...
> just want to mention (or
2016 May 04
0
Unicast or Multicast?
Oh, well by your "In the end... its the same..." statement and your
question of what the difference is (and mentioning connection tracking
which is a completely different subject), I was a bit confused as to
your query.
Cheers,
Jordan
On 05/04/2016 09:55 AM, buddylove wrote:
> I was already aware if this in the first place :-)
>
> On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:
2009 Apr 21
2
[Bridge] NIC unicast macs table manipulation by bridge
Using a Linux bridge I see that none of the interfaces is set to promiscuous
mode but on the other hand I don't see any dev_unicast_xxx calls in the
bridge code... for the case of one of the interfaces being a physical NIC
(e.g eth1), what's the magic that makes the NIC RX filtering be willing
to accept frames whos dest mac isn't the NIC "primary" unicast mac?
Also is there
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Feature enhancement - Disable unicast flooding
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: unicast-flooding-2.6.20.4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3300 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20070416/4585d8f0/unicast-flooding-2.6.20.4-0002.bin
2012 Jun 27
3
[Bug 795] New: RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation resulting in unicast reply
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795
Summary: RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation
resulting in unicast reply
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component:
2011 Jan 21
0
Storm Clustering using clusters in evd
Hi,
I am using the clusters function in the evd package in order to determine
storm events from a wave time series.
So far I have the code working as I want it for wave height on its own but I
would now like to include the period as well. The input data is in the form
of:
H t
H t
H t
so every height measurement has a corresponding period.
The storms are defined when the wave height exceeds a
2009 Mar 21
1
KDB+DDB make interrupt storm on MSI motherboards go away it seems
I admit I was scepticle of this suggestion - but it actually seems to
have worked. COmpiling a straight GENERIC kernel with KDB and DDB
included do seem to have made my irq22 interrupt storms go away.
Certainly I have spent some time trying to provoke the problem and not
managed to make it read it's ugly head again.
The thing is though, this doen't make me particularly happy - as I am
2001 Dec 08
1
HTB Message Storm HTB Delay <large number> > 5 secs
Hello I''ve set up a simple system. It seems to work for a short while,
but now I''ve got batches of 100''s of these messages.
Also I can''t connect through that box any more. It''s as if forwarding
died.
Has anyone any advice?
Regards
John