similar to: How to improve performance of samba

Hi everyone, I'm trying to rsync a large directory. After pondering on the list-of-files, it's now more or less doing nothing. It's running for over 4 hours now, not doing anything except eating CPUtime on the destination for over half an hour. I don't know what it was doing before that. The stdout of the rsync reported: 4675350 files to consider (which is about right)

I have an email server running Exim, Dovecot, Spamassassin, Clam, etc. on Centos 4.x 32bit. On occasion I have disk I/O problems. Its handling several domains and alot of email. Its currently on a single SATA drive. I am thinking of moving too 3 drives with RAID 1 for redundancy. RAID 1 will help me on reads but do nothing on writes as I understand. I am thinking the majority of my I/O is

Have anyone experienced mixed meetme conferences? Im running a 12 seat call center outbound only. Asterisk 1.2.8, SIP/ulaw at the phones, SIP/ulaw to the SIP terminator. Machine: pentium Dual core 2.0ghz (533 fsb) , 1 GB RAM (533mhz ddr) , 2 SATA 80GB DISK in RAID 0 via software RAID driver. Two Intel PRO 10/100 NIC, IRQs are separated, an X100P so not to use ztdummy. Motherboard is an Intel

Hi All, I have read many posts about problems with Asterisk on some systems. I also set up Asterisk on many different boxes. But I have never seen the following... There is an IBM X346 (3.4GHz Xeon) with one Sangoma A104. This system is currently idle, that means there is nothing running except Asterisk (1.2.7.1). We are handling no calls now, but if I do a vmstat, I get peaks in system load up

Hi I have a pair of 1950's running as a failover pair of front ends for a Fibre array and a SCSI array. i am currently just running on the SCSI array and the fibre is not in production yet. I am seeing load on the active node sit at around 8 and throughput to the SCSI array is around 25MB/s - I would imagine i should see better figures that this and less machine load. Can anyone give

Hi all, Running CentOS 4.2 with the following conditions: [root at gatekeeper bin]# uname -srvmpi Linux 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 27 12:26:11 CDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 [root at gatekeeper bin]# uptime 07:54:41 up 31 days, 13:45, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 [root at gatekeeper bin]# rpm -q ntop ntop-3.1-1.2.el4.rf [root at gatekeeper bin]# df -h S.ficheros Tama?o Usado

Running "yum update", yum appears to perform fine and appears to finish but continues to reside in memory: ... Updating : lftp 2/4 Cleanup : lftp 3/4 Cleanup : freetype 4/4 Updated: freetype.i386 0:2.2.1-25.el5_5 lftp.i386 0:3.7.11-4.el5_5.3

Hi Got a box that acts as a web/db server - recently i have started to see odd timeout errors between the app and webserver on this box - Can't see anything obvious and as far as i'm aware nothing has changed any ideas? 9:27am up 128 days, 21:12, 1 user, load average: 4.05, 3.45, 3.07 Mem: 1027760K av, 1022644K used, 5116K free, 196K shrd, 141620K buff Swap: 2097112K

Hello, I would like to ask on suggested vsz_limit values. Is there any way of calculating such values? How should we determine them? I don't want to risk wrong values (and possible errors) on a production system, if I upgrade to 2.0.16 where vsz_limit values are enforced (I read release notes)! If there is no standard way of calculation, could someone please check the following info and

Hi, I have a machine under heavy network traffic. Kernel is Centos kernel 2.6.18 SMP 32 bit. Ethernets are 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 80003ES2LAN Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 80003ES2LAN Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) 06:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82541PI Gigabit Ethernet

Hi all, I am attempting to tune a (RedHat 7.3) Linux box running samba 2.2.8a. This application is serving files to PC clients via samba, and the PC clients are uploading files to the server via ftp. Now for the specifics... These files are mpeg2 encoded video with bit rates ranging from 3Mbit/s - 20Mbit/s. When there is zero write activity against the disks I can kick off multiple concurrent

I'm sure this has gotten some attention before, but I have two CSV files generated from vmstat and free that are roughly 6-8 Mb (about 80,000 lines) each. When I try to use read.csv(), R allocates all available memory (about 4.9 Gb) when loading the files, which is over 300 times the size of the raw data. Here are the scripts used to generate the CSV files as well as the R code: Scripts (run

Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load average value: w command: > [root at s-doc ~]# w > 11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > root pts/2 dodo:S.0 11:15 0.00s 0.02s 0.00s w top command: > top - 12:13:31 up 42 days, 9 min, 1

I made the mistake of looking at disk IO numbers in two different ways -- now I'm confused, because they give inconsistent answers. First way was using 'vmstat 10'. This gave me (apologies for wrapped lines): r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 2 0 2162944 4071928 162444 4218456 0 0 0 286 1103 528 3 2 95 0 0 1 0

Hello, I am in need of a Samba Performance Consultant immediatley. My box is just not fast enough, and I still have 8 business hours left. Consultant should recommend: - fastest Samba options for our setup - fastest Linux kernel options / sysctl parameters - fastest Windows client options / registry settings I expect to pay $500 for 2 hours of your time. You should be an expert. Its 12:30

I'm not sure if this is a known issue or not. # uname -a Linux XXXXXXXXXXXX 2.4.21-9.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jan 8 16:54:23 EST 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 1) # vmstat 5 procs memory swap io system cpu r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us

I'm trying to figure out what's causing an average system load of 3+ to 5+ on an Intel quad core. The server has with 2 KVM guests (assigned 1 core and 2 cores) that's lightly loaded (0.1~0.4) each. Both guest/host are running 64bit CentOS 5.6 Originally I suspected maybe it's i/o but on checking, there is very little i/o wait % as well. Plenty of free disk space available on all

Hi All, I have a Linux box (P3-800MHz/196MB RAM/10GB+320GB) running Samba 3.0.22 server and a Windows XP (P3-800MHz/512MB RAM/200GB) client. The transfer speed (both ways) is about 5-7 MB/s when file is smaller than 700MB. For larger files there is a difference: when the Win client writes a file on the small Linux disk (10GB) the speed is as above. But when I copy, let's say, a 1.5GB file

SYSTEM: rh6x based system, 2.2.19-6.2.7 rh errata kernel + 0.0.7a patch, I rebuilt rpm for i686; celeron466, 64MB, PIIX4. root fs is on software raid1 ext2, 6 additional fs's on software raid1 ext2. There's a 3rd HD, not mirrored, which is mounted ext3. EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. I enabled journal with tune2fs -j with unmounted fs. The 3 HDs are tuned with

libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 3 player/swfplay.c | 2 test/trace/ASSetPropFlags-extended-5.swf |binary test/trace/ASSetPropFlags-extended-5.swf.trace | 8213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/trace/ASSetPropFlags-extended-6.swf |binary test/trace/ASSetPropFlags-extended-6.swf.trace | 8213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++