similar to: can't create solaris package for samba 3.0.37

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "can't create solaris package for samba 3.0.37"

2010 Mar 30
3
help installing samba 3.0.37 on solairs 9 server
I am getting these errors running: sh makepkg.sh can anyone help? =============================================== root# sh makepkg.sh Distribution base: /var/tmp/samba-3.0.37 Temp install dir: /tmp/samba-3.0.37-build Install directory: /opt/samba mkdir: Failed to make directory "/tmp/samba-3.0.37-build"; File exists make: Fatal error: Don't know how to make target
2010 Apr 08
2
issue installing samba 3.0.37
makepkg.sh script fails can anyone help? Gregory Jones Unix System Administrator CSC - Exelon Account gregory.jones at exeloncorp.com 847-975-3948 ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
2005 Oct 15
1
makepkg.sh for samba 3.0.20
Hi, I downloaded 3.0.20 from samba.org, ran makepkg.sh to create samba pkg for Solaris. The install base for the new version locates in /opt/samba and the smbd locates in /etc/samba. I tried to modify the makepkg.sh to put everything under /usr/local/samba as follow: Delete: ==== --localstatedir=/var/lib/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run \
2002 Mar 13
1
Problem with buildpkg.sh
I am attempting to successfully run the buildpkg.sh script which is located in the contrib/solaris directory. I am receiving the following error: Building pkginfo file... Building prototype file... Building package.. ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. pkgmk: ERROR: parameter <VERSION> cannot be null ## Packaging was not successful. pkgtrans: ERROR:
2002 May 22
1
(no subject)
This is the output of ./buidpkg.sh of openssh-3.1p1 on "SunOS 5.6 Generic_105181-17 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-20" Building pkginfo file... Building prototype file... Building package.. ## Building pkgmap from package prototype file. ## Processing pkginfo file. pkgmk: ERROR: parameter <VERSION> cannot be null ## Packaging was not successful. pkgtrans: ERROR: unable to complete
2002 Apr 10
1
problem with making solaris package (openssh)
if [ ! -f /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/moduli ]; then \ if [ -f /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/primes ]; then \ echo "moving /opt/sldx/slwo/openssh-3.1p1/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/etc/primes to /opt/sldx/
2002 Mar 12
0
Can't get 3.1p1 to compile under Solaris 8
OK, I feel like an idiot, but I can't get 3.1p1 to compile under Solaris 8. Older versions I've gotten set up, but can't with this latest one. I have followed both the general directions and the directions in contrib/solaris, and neither one works. Since I have Solaris, here's the output from the directions in contrib/solaris... ./configure --with-pam
2001 Oct 03
3
samba on solaris 8
any body had any issues with samba on solaris8 ( sparc ) which version is advisable thanks
2002 Mar 18
1
Need help with buildpkg script
Ben, I am trying to create a package for Openssh.3-1p1, but the /contrib/solaris/buildpkg.sh script failes with the following errors: ./mkinstalldirs /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/b in mkdir /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/bin ./mkinstalldirs /tools/OpenSSH/openssh-3.1p1/contrib/solaris/package/usr/local/s bin mkdir
2007 Jun 12
1
PATCH: install inst/ before doing lazyload on Windows
Hi, On Windows, package files in the inst/ subdir are installed after the lazyload creation. This differs from Linux where inst/ is installed _before_ lazyload creation. Since packages may need data in inst, I think the order on Windows should be changed. Perhaps like this: diff --git a/src/gnuwin32/MakePkg b/src/gnuwin32/MakePkg index 57af321..868e8f1 100644 --- a/src/gnuwin32/MakePkg +++
2014 Aug 11
5
issue when building/making package from git
I am trying to build/install libguestfs from git. My box is Archlinux, GCC 4.9.1 and all dev tools installed. If I manually $ gitclone gitUrl $ cd libguestfs $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure --someOptions the build goes until the end and leaves me with binaries. ------------------------------ --- Now I want to install it properly on my machine. Arch use a makepkg [1] command to build and install
1998 Jul 26
1
R-beta: building libraries on Win95
I am using rw0613b with djtools on Win95. No problem with makefiles building fortran and C dll's, plus can build R.exe with the supplied libraries (including mva). Why then do I get the following error when I try to building an existing library separately, eg... (/R-0.61.3/src/gnuwin32)$ make -f MakePkg -C ../library/mva PKG=mva make.exe: Entering directory `c:/R-0.61.3/src/library/mva'
2004 Apr 30
0
buildpkg.sh enhancements
I've made some changes to buildpkg.sh to make it easier for package builders to add their local changes. I'd like people that use buildpkg.sh to test and comment on these changes before I commit them to CVS. None of the defaults have changed. Some of the patch is is just moving chunks of code to a different location to make some of the enhancements work. Some things you may find
2014 Aug 11
2
Re: issue when building/making package from git
> > Does p2v/virt-p2v (binary) exist? > NO > > Now I want to install it properly on my machine. Arch use a makepkg > > [1] command to build and install packages not in the official repos. > > > > When running > > $ makepkg > > I have this structure which sounds correct: > > libguestfs-git/pkg/ > >
2014 Aug 12
2
Re: issue when building/making package from git
> There's probably a dependency missing. Look closely at the > ./configure output and the README file. > I have checked all packages in README and libguestfs/appliance/packagelist. All are installed. > > You should test this first of all by building from source, and > without installing, I first run makepkg, so no install > > ./run guestfish -N fs -m /dev/sda1
2003 Oct 01
2
Hep for creating a package
Hi, I created a package for OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 in UNIX (OS: Sun Solaris), the newly created package includes binaries,man pages, libraries and Configuration files. I am planning to install this package in all of my Sun server's (Approximately 200 Server's). We have SSH/OpenSSH older version are already installed and running in all of the sun boxes. I want to install the
2014 Aug 12
2
Re: issue when building/making package from git
> > You need to build first of all from git, using ./configure && make && > make quickcheck. $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure $ ./make Build is broken with the error mentioned eralier (the one about e2fsprogs) ./configure --disable-appliance it builds fine > > makepkg is doing some strange stuff. Get the basics working first. The issue is not makepkg but rather the
2007 Feb 23
0
Solved two problems with Cygwin
While installing software on a new computer, I thought I would try to use Cygwin to build an R package. (Note: NOT Ripley/Murdoch's Rtools). I uncovered and solved two issues, one of which appears to be identical to a problem previously reported (and unsolved) on this list. I offer this information in case it will be helpful. (1) Cygwin defaults to UNIX mode when installed, but it appears
2014 Aug 12
3
Re: issue when building/making package from git
My current version is supermin 5.1.8-1 > > If the tests *don't* run successfully, then you've most likely found a > bug in supermin. That has to be fixed before continuing. > tests failed. See the log below. ========================================== supermin 5.1.9: tests/test-suite.log ========================================== # TOTAL: 8 # PASS: 5 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL:
2014 Aug 19
2
Samba 3.0.37 license confusion
Hello Jeremy and samba maintainers, I am using Samba 3.0.37 and I am confused about the license. On one hand both the COPYING file in the 3.0.37 tarball and your website indicates that version 3.0.37 is GPLv2. http://news.samba.org/announcements/samba_gplv3/ On the other hand, in the 3.0.37 tarball, there are many files with GPLv3 headers without any exception. For instance, several file in