Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Update to 3.5 failed"
2009 Apr 25
3
Bug in sernet RPM's postun?
Hi,
I was just wondering whether this possible bug with the Sernet Samba3
RPMs for CentOS 5 is known, since it has not yet been fixed.
When uninstalling the Sernet RPMs for Samba3 (in this case Samba 3.2.x)
the %postun scriptlet fails every time with:
# rpm -e samba3-3.2.0-36
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56356: line 2: fg: no job control
error: %postun(samba3-3.2.0-36.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status
2020 Jan 23
2
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated
>
> The log below shows:
>
> [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22
> Loaded plugins:
2011 Nov 05
1
[YUM] - Issue on package removal order on CentOS 5
Hello,
I post here because I have an embarassing issue considering the yum
version provided with CentOS 5.
I am trying to package an application for CentOS. So I wrote my own
specfile which is composed of declaration of various packages (main
application and plugins for this applications).
In that the configuration, the plugins RPM depends on the main
application RPM because. Moreover, in
2017 Jul 17
2
Messages during update 'yum update' at CentOS 6 VM
Hello,
at the last update (Kernel updated
from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64)
I got these messages
Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or
directory
warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status
127
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package
2008 Dec 12
3
Error on Samba 3.2.6 installation
When I installed Samba 3.2.6 from Sernet, I got the following error:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54116: line 2: fg: no job control
error: %postun(samba3-3.0.32-36.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
The error happens when installing the samba and winbind RPMs.
I got the same error when installing the previous version 3.2.5 and
perhaps 3.2.4. The "rpm-tmp.number" was different in those cases,
2016 Oct 06
2
porting spec files
An rpm intended for a bleeding edge Fedora builds perfectly for me when
I comment two macros apparently not in CentOS 7 -
%transfiletriggerin
and
%transfiletriggerun
Looks like they operate similar to %post and %postun but are different.
Is a simple way to do what they do in CentOS 7 or do I have to change
the packaging logic to build in CentOS 7 and have things work properly?
--
-=-
Sent
2015 Apr 30
1
Segmentation fault issue with new install
2015-04-29 8:57 GMT+02:00 "Thomas B. R?cker" <thomas at ruecker.fi>:
> On 04/28/2015 02:27 PM, Jan-Pieter wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > see my reply inline.
> > Cheers, Jan-Pieter
> >
> >
> > 2015-04-26 7:23 GMT+02:00 "Thomas B. R?cker" <thomas at ruecker.fi
> > <mailto:thomas at ruecker.fi>>:
> >
> > On
2005 Jan 24
1
Error when updating centos-3.3 to 3.4
The following error appeared and I'm wondering if it's important enough to
file a bug report:
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8817: line 2: gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders: command not found
error: %postun(librsvg2-2.2.3-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
Also /etc/sysconfig/rhn/rhn-applet.rpmnew got created; the difference is
that the uuid has changed from a hex key to "UNSPECIFIED". I
2008 Nov 03
1
rpm spec question
Hi
I am trying to package a bunch of files so that i can deploy them with
rpm - Its prtty much just a case of dumping some files on the filesystem.
I achieve this with rpm without issue however when i remove the rpm from
the system it also removes the dir that contains the files, even though
i dont specify this in the %postun. Is there a way to tell rpm to NOT
remove files/dir's that it
2001 Mar 28
1
PATCH: buglet in vorbis-tools.spec
The attached typo results in error on uninstall of vorbis-tools:
error: execution of %postun scriptlet from vorbis-tools-1.0beta4-1 failed,
exit status 2
cheers/d
--
nuclear cia fbi spy password code president bomb
8D97 F297 CA0D 8751 D8EB 12B6 6EA6 727F 9B8D EC2A
<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<LI>text/plain attachment: vorbis-tools.spec.diff
</UL>
-------------- next part
2020 Jan 22
5
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
I have a VPS running C7. I ran a 'yum update' which included a kernel update. The yum update wasn't a total success because mariadb updates failed. However everything else appeared to work.
However, when I rebooted the server it did not restart. I have managed to get the ISP's support desk to boot the server by selecting the previous kernel, and I now have access to my box again.
2020 Jan 22
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated
The log below shows:
[root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
Repository mariadb is listed more than once in
2020 Jan 23
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns
>> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the
>> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover
>> from this would be greatly appreciated
>>
>> The log below shows:
>>
>> [root at
2008 Apr 08
3
Ruby RRDtool bindings and CentOS 5
For whatever reason, the RPMForge package ruby-rrdtool doesn''t play
nice on my CentOS 5.1 box with puppetmaster. It installs
site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/RRD.so, which puppetmaster is unable to find
(and the suggested test of ruby -rRRDtool -e ''puts :yep'' fails).
Using ln to link RRD.so to RRDtool.so works for the command line test,
but still fails for puppetmaster. This
2016 Oct 07
1
porting spec files
On 10/07/2016 01:44 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 06/10/16 22:50, Alice Wonder wrote:
>> An rpm intended for a bleeding edge Fedora builds perfectly for me when
>> I comment two macros apparently not in CentOS 7 -
>>
>> %transfiletriggerin
>>
>> and
>>
>> %transfiletriggerun
>>
>> Looks like they operate similar to %post and %postun but
2009 Jul 28
1
[PATCH ovirt-node] Removed subpackages, stateful, stateless, logos, and selinux for inclusuion in Fedora
rhbz#:51422
---
ovirt-node.spec.in | 149 +++++++++------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ovirt-node.spec.in b/ovirt-node.spec.in
index 3138011..b4e660d 100644
--- a/ovirt-node.spec.in
+++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in
@@ -43,76 +43,23 @@ Requires: nc
Requires: grub
Requires: /usr/sbin/crond
Requires: anyterm
2007 Dec 29
3
tcltk again
Hello,
the admonition of Prof. Ripley to search the documentation to solve my problem
helped, today I read a lot more on Tcl/Tk than before ;-)
But now I'm stuck again. With the help of my script some functions are plotted
on the display, then I ask if the user wants to save it as pdf. In windows I
use winDialog and it works. But I can't succeed in Linux. In short:
2010 Apr 22
2
rpm -U query
CentOS, RHEL, all versions.
Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not
relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files.
It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been installed.
So what happens if foo-1.0 needs to run a binary that was provided as part
of foo-1.0 during its %preun stage, and a binary of the same name is
2017 Jul 17
0
Messages during update 'yum update' at CentOS 6 VM
Walter H. wrote:
>
> at the last update (Kernel updated
> from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64)
> I got these messages
>
> Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or
> directory
> warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status
> 127
>
2006 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Fedora Core 5 package
The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not
using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which
you might be interested in. The current version is attached.
Reid.
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile.
> My spec file is derived from the included spec file