similar to: samba ignores supplementary groups for acl

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "samba ignores supplementary groups for acl"

2005 Jul 28
1
samba ignores supplementary groups for acl
Hi, I'm running samba 3.0.14a-3 on Debian sarge (sparc). The filesystem is ext3 with acl support. winbind works fine. Please see below. when I am logged in using ssh, I can list the files in a folder (/var/Share) for which the group "staff" has r-x permissions. The problem is I can't list the folder through samba: $ ssh cyberlab+kent@cladms003 Password: Linux cladms003
2005 Jul 27
2
wbinfo can't list users
Hi, I'm running debian sarge with kernel 2.6.8-2-sparc64. I'm trying to use winbind to connect to a Windows 2000 server. I can use "net rpc join" to join the domain, but "wbinfo -u" returns an error. The trusted domains listed doesn't include the domain. Please see below: cladms003:~# net rpc join -U Administrator Password: Joined domain CYBERLAB. cladms003:~#
2019 Oct 01
1
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
Dear, I am having a problem configuring Samba 4 domain member. The main server works only as AD and the second one will be for file sharing. Looking at the logs I see errors like: "UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups" Logs: https://pastebin.com/BR1W0X3E smb.conf: https://pastebin.com/B5Ve41KG Does anyone know what can it be? Thanks!
2005 Mar 30
0
Samba 3.0.13 security= ADS / Problem to access a share in auth_util.c ==> change of group not taken into account (supplementary groups)
Excuse me, i am french.... My SAMBA v3.0.13 (over a linux Redhat 7.3.1 With kernel 2.4.27-4) is configured with " security = ADS " to communicate with Active directory (2003 server). The problem : When i modify the group of a user in the Active directory, this modification is not completely taken into account in samba. In fact the orders "getent" and "wbinfo"
2013 Oct 11
1
One user getting: "Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups" on standalone server
Greetings, We are having some rights issues on Samba 3.6.18 running on Slackware64 14.0 (the official Slackware Package). One of our users is having access issues and I believe I have traced the problem to the following entry in the log.smbd: Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Issuing the groups command for this user returns the 8 Linux groups in which the user has
2013 Oct 11
0
Rights Issues - one user getting: "Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups" on standalone server
Greetings, We are having some rights issues on Samba 3.6.18 running on Slackware64 14.0 (the official Slackware Package). One of our users is having access issues and I believe I have traced the problem to the following entry in the log.smbd: Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups Issuing the groups command for this user returns the 8 Linux groups in which the user has
2018 Mar 20
0
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
You could try the setting. ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only >From man smb.conf The available settings are: · ntlmv1-permitted (alias yes) - Allow NTLMv1 and above for all clients. · ntlmv2-only (alias no) - Do not allow NTLMv1 to be used, but permit NTLMv2. · mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only - Only allow NTLMv1 when the client
2020 May 14
0
Users loose supplementary groups after a time
Sorry, I thought I had re-enabled delivery, but I had not. So trying to reply to Rowland Penny here: > On 14/05/2020 18:46, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >> All - >> >> I seem to be suffering from the common complaint that users loose >> supplementary group access after a while - in our case it seems to be >> connections left overnight. Restarting smb
2020 May 15
0
Users loose supplementary groups after a time
On 5/15/20 12:56 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 14/05/2020 21:59, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >> Sorry, I thought I had re-enabled delivery, but I had not.? So trying to reply >> to Rowland Penny here: >> >>> On 14/05/2020 18:46, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >>>> All - >>>> >>>> ??? I seem to be suffering from the
2020 May 15
0
Users loose supplementary groups after a time
On 5/15/20 12:56 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 14/05/2020 21:59, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >> Sorry, I thought I had re-enabled delivery, but I had not.? So trying >> to reply >> to Rowland Penny here: >> >>> On 14/05/2020 18:46, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >>>> All - >>>> >>>> ??? I seem to be suffering
2019 Oct 03
1
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
Hello! I thought this was a mistake, sorry. So I created the shared directories and defined which groups can access this directory and includes the users in the defined group. However, the user defined in the group cannot access the directory, gives access denied. Take a look at the settings, if you can give me a direction of where my error is. # smb.conf [SHARE] comment = SHARE path =
2019 Oct 03
1
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
Rowland, thanks for listening. I am learning to use the list, this is the first time I use this feature, sorry for the inconvenience, I believe it is the last message that will be created as new. I changed my receive settings to be able to reply to messages individually. >From what you answered earlier, I have a main server with AD, running Samba 4, everything is configured and working. The
2020 May 15
0
Users loose supplementary groups after a time
On 5/15/20 8:22 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/05/2020 14:56, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 5/15/20 12:56 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 14/05/2020 21:59, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> This configuration (dropping the username map script hack) seems to be >>>> working >>>> for us, does this seem
2018 Mar 19
2
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
Hello, We have a rfs6000 wifi model controller from Extreme Network that has the ability to become a member of the AD. When we configure it according to Extreme support, the error "NT_STATUS_LOGIN_FAILURE" on the controller and in the samba logs shows the following errors. UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2018/03/19 17:26:25.986601, 5,
2013 Sep 11
2
create_local_nt_token_from_info3 not pulling supplementary UNIX groups
I'm trying to solve this issue I'm having where using 'valid users = +unixgroup' just plain doesn't work. I can't find any /documented/ reason why this is so, but nevertheless, it seems to be the case. This is with samba 3.6.18, but seems to exist in all of 3.6.x and most or all of 3.5.x and perhaps earlier as well (see bug #6681). From what I can tell, the underlying
2003 Apr 04
4
LDAP Supplementary Groups not recognised
We are implementing the following: Solaris 9 iPlanet Directory Server 5.1 (bundled with Solaris 9) openldap 2.1.16 Only used for ldap libaries (samba will not compile without. Is this other people's experience?) samba 2.2.8 compiled with ./configure --with-ldapsam --with-acl-support We have the samba server acting as a PDC with all user and machine accounts in LDAP as
2012 Mar 24
0
winbindd not providing supplementary groups with server 2003 AD
I have Windows server 2003 AD controller and Samba 3 (3.5.11 or 3.6.3) member server running on FreeBSD 8.2/9.0. I don't use MS Services for Unix and my setup relies on Winbindd for idmapping. I can see all users / groups with wbinfo -g, wbinfo -u, getent group, getent passwd. I can see all user's group with id <username>. I had to solve more complicated tasks including ACLs and
2004 Jan 13
2
Mac OS X client problem with supplementary groups
I have a very simple Samba 3.0.1 install without LDAP/ADS/winbind support compiled into it. I have noticed a strange problem with supplementary groups I noticed with Mac OS X (10.3.2). The SAMBA server is using 'ntdomain' authentication. When someone connects to the SAMBA server and gives their username in uppercase (the OS's default), then none of the secondary UNIX groups the
2018 Mar 19
3
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
> > It might help if you told us how Extreme advised you to configure it. https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/How_To/How-to-set-internal-RADIUS-server-on-WiNG-with-LDAP-based-authentication http://www.michaelfmcnamara.com/files/motorola/WING5X_How_To_Active_Directory_Authentication_Rev_B.pdf https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1150860/Motorola-Wing-5-7-1.html
2019 Oct 04
1
Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
I haven't learned to use the list yet, sorry! :( See below the two smb.conf ### smb.conf - AD [global] netbios name = SRV-SAMBA realm = DOMINIO.LAN workgroup = DOMINIO dns forwarder = X.X.X.X server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes ntlm auth = yes ldap server require strong auth = no tls enabled = no security = user vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl