similar to: Samba 3.4.5 won't compile (Slackware)

Preface, running redhat 8.0 (pretty standard and up2date) [atlantis 158] uname -a Linux atlantis.cs.umd.edu 2.4.18-27.8.0 #1 Fri Mar 14 06:45:49 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [atlantis 159] gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty;

Please help! Thanks in advance! Solaris 8 samba-3.0.0rc4 gcc version 3.2.1 % ./configure && make %make Using FLAGS = -g -O2 -Iinclude -I/opt/samba-3.0.0rc4/source/include -I/opt/samba-3.0.0rc4/source/ubiqx -I/opt/samba-3.0.0rc4/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/opt/samba-3.0.0rc4/source LIBS = -lsendfile -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl

Ok, this is simply getting annoying now. First, with Slackware 9, I could build Samba 3, could join a domain, but nobody in the domain could use the Samba machine, or browse the shares on it, or log into it. Just for grins, I decided to build a whole new machine and try with the latest Slackware (9.1) to see if I could fare any better. No go.... I can't even get Samba 3 to build. Besides

Running into a error while compiling Samba 3.0.23c for AD using krb5 1.5.1. Doesn't matter if I use Sun's cc or gcc. Linking bin/smbd Undefined first referenced symbol in file error_message libsmb/cliconnect.o (symbol belongs to implicit dependency /export/admin/build/build/krb5/lib/libcom_err.so.3) ld: fatal:

I'm using samba 3.0.24. I create my Makefile for cross compiling smbd nmbd testparm and CP850.so: Makefile: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ # Flags divers #COFLAGS=-O2 CWFLAGS= -g -Wall # Cross compile tools CC=mips-linux-gcc #CC=gcc LINT=splint SHLD= $(CC) -O -D_SAMBA_BUILD_ LDSHFLAGS=-shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic

It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as one would expect, only non-directories (with the exception of '.') are listed. Other tidbits.. some obvious, some maybe not: - not limited to just

Hello List, To whom it might concern: I have been working in some SlackBuilds (script for making Slackware Packages) for my personal use, but thought they might be useful for someone else here. Beside of the exceptional distributions used so far (CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu, etc.), you might want to test Asterisk on a Slackware Linux box, as it offers outstanding stability and flexibility as

Samba team.. I spent an hour trying to post to the samaba news group at gmane.org. my browser seems retarded, and I need to do work. I also spent about 20 minutes trying to figure out the bugzilla deal, but its beyond me, plus i am getting very frustraited trying to send this damm bug report. so.. here.. here is the bug report. please post it, whatever. Hi all, I am attempting to

Please see my post from 24 hours ago for the background on my efforts to get Samba to run. I received instructions to modify include/includes.h to change the #include <compat.h> to #include <compat_ap.h>. Needless to say, this solved nothing other than a bunch of harmless warnings. It also caused a different warning to spew forth eternally from gcc, and more importantly, it

GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/syscalls.nrs GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.c KLIBCCC usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.o OBJCOPY usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.bin GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/syscalls.mk GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/SYSCALLS.i GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/syscalls.nrs GEN usr/klibc/syscalls/typesize.c KLIBCCC

Hello List, I've been trying to compile Asterisk with H.323 support and, after correctly installing PTLib and H323plus (OpenH323), the Asterisk configure script still doesn't detect the dependencies as installed. I know they are correctly installed because after going into "[asterisk-source-directory]/channels/h323" and issuing a 'make opt', it correctly builds

Hi! I am a current maintainer of the R slackbuild script (for Slackware GNU/Linux distribution). I received requests from users to build R with --enable-R-shlib and --enable-BLAS-shlib, so now I am trying to decide whether to do so by default. Is there a downside to building R with either option? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc

So, I'm building 3.0.23b for Slackware (since they don't have it out yet[1]), and I've noticed these two lines in the script that Slackware uses to build Samba 3.0.23 from source (which I'm modifying to build 3.0.23b): # -j options don't seem to work... make Anyone know why that comment might be there? Is it true that Samba can't be built with "-j2" or

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65310 Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> --- Using gcc 4.8.1 $ gcc -v

This is very possibly an easy fix, as I've had steam running on this particular box before through wine. However, I've been googling my ass off and looking through the suggested fixes on the appdb to no avail. Let's start with my setup: OS: Slackware 13.37 (64 bit with working multilib) completely up to date Video: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT running the most recent linux 64 bit

On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 22:58:11 +0200 Henry Jensen <hjensen at mailbox.org> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am Sat, 09 Jun 2018 16:22:09 -0400 > schrieb Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org>: > > > I've downloaded the Samba 4.8.2 package from the Slackware64 current > > repository. I am preparing to install the package (after a full > > backup). Are there any

I''ve built the slackware packages of rails. rails path is: /frm/ruby/1.8.6/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 RUBYLIB : /frm/ruby/1.8.6/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8:/frm/ruby/1.8.6/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i686-linux/ I could created the rails application, but files are missing. Config - boot.rb, database.yml, environment.rb and routes.rb Public -

? Hello. ?I'm trying to compile samba on a?armnas. ? First I execute: autogen.sh configure make ? And got the following error: ? ? ? ? Compiling ../libcli/samsync/decrypt.c Linking bin/net utils/net_rpc.o: In function `net_rpc': net_rpc.c:(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `libnetapi_net_init' utils/net_rpc.o: In function `net_rpc_file': net_rpc.c:(.text+0x2d74): undefined

hello everyone, I've been testing the NUT solution as opposed to the undocumented LanSafe application to control my Eaton UPS. I am on a Slackware 13.37 system with a 2.6.37.6 kernel. NUT version is 2.4.3 . I installed the tarball by compiling it directly on my system (as a slackbuild package). The UPS is an Eaton Powerware 9155, but I don't know how to obtain the manufacturing date. The

HI, On 29/07/2014 22:23, Ady wrote: > Even without such "Mac" hardware at hand, it might still be helpful > to test mkisofs 3.01a24 and then check the resulting ISO image. > Perhaps Didier can update his current version of mkisofs and retry > with his current scripts/receipts. I will upgrade the cdrtools package from 3.01a17 to 3.01a24 in the coming days and see what I