similar to: Samba as a AD slave

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how > important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a > commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding > Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, > for including

On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Dominic Hamon wrote: >> Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the >>>> case, I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the >>>> old non-folding

me22 wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how >> important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a >> commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding >> Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters,

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > immediately. Boost is a nebulous piece of software with a wide range of >

Making data, especially data that have been the subject of published papers, widely available, can be a useful spinoff from the R project, another gift to the scientific community beyond the provision of computing and analytic tools. Nowadays, in a complete publication of a scientific result, there is every reason for the data to be part of that publication. The Gentleman and Lang 2004

Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, > for including work that is not safe for commercial users to take on. Ie, > there are so many contributors, and their contribution tracking has been > poor in the past, that business affairs departments in commercial > companies, and their

Am Sonntag, den 18.05.2008, 20:39 -0400 schrieb me22: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87 Yann Rouillard <yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

On 11/01/2023 12:35 p.m., RICHET Yann wrote: > Thank you all, for these advices. > > So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/... > Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list"). > For now, waiting for CRAN results... I think Sebastian or my

Hi, I am a student in archaeology with some interest in statistics and R. Recently I've obtained the permission to distribute in the public domain a small dataset (named "spearheads" with 40 obs. of 14 variables) that was used in an introductory statistics book for archaeologists (published in 1994). I've rewritten most of the exercises of that book in R and made them

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2297 Bug ID: 2297 Summary: EDD25519 Signature verification failed on Solaris Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Thanks Geoff, it's becoming more clear to me now... > So, assuming it does, you could try: > aumix -w r [yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -w R [yann@raglou yann]$ aumix -q vol 100, 100 pcm 100, 100 speaker 0, 0 line 0, 0, P mic 4, 0, P cd 0, 0, P igain 0, 0, P line1 0, 0, R phin 0, 0, P phout 0, 0 video 0, 0, P No "R" on the pcm line, so that is probably the problem : my soundcard

Thank you all, for these advices. So I try to fix OMP_THREADS, cleanup tests, and display explicitly what test is running by moving in tests/ instead of tests/testthat/... Next step should be to investigate blocking test using a reporter (maybe "list"). For now, waiting for CRAN results... Yann -----Message d'origine----- De?: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>

Thank you for your answer. In facts, 10 threads are asked by armadillo for some LinAlg, which backs to two threads as warned. But I cannot imagine this costs so much time just for that... A deeper analysis of time spent seems to point that a large time was mainly spent on testthat and Rcpp dependencies compilation... But other recent packages depending on these also are not spending so much time.

Dear list I am relatively new to networking problems of this kind so apologies for the potentially simple question. I am trying to upgrade an existing network to one using Samba 3 to configure roaming XP profiles on a limited number of clients. I have re-written the smb.conf file to reflect what I think are the appropriate settings, and this passed testparm successfully, but I am unclear

Dear R useRs, I have a problem with nls.lm function of minpackl.lm package. I need to fit the Van Genuchten Model to a set of data of Theta and hydraulic conductivity with nls.lm function of minpack.lm package. For the first fit, the parameter estimates keep changing even after 1000 iterations (Th) and I have a following error message for fit of hydraulic conductivity (k); Reason for

Dear R-helper, I am trying to save some plots I made with lattice, but I have several pages printed for each call. My layout is something like c(col=2,row=4,pages=12) and I didn't find a way to save those plots, because I am usually using savePlot() which from what I saw can only save one page/device a the time. Is there an easy way to save all the plots? or should I use a loop and cut

Hi all, I'm tryong to have Notes running under Linux, but when I launch it I get this error : [yann@localhost yann]$ wine "c:\Program Files\lotus\notes\nlnotes.exe" wine: cannot determine executable type for L"C:\\Program Files\\lotus\\notes\\nlnotes.exe" Anyone can help ?? Thanx

Hi all, I've just installed 1.9.18p5 (although I've just got the mail about 1.9.18p6, so I'll be putting that on now) and am having a problem with browsing... [samba@suau1] ~> smbclient -L suau1 Added interface ip=134.225.16.5 bcast=134.225.19.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 Server time is Mon May 11 15:24:39 1998 Timezone is UTC+1.0 Password: Domain=[UNSEEN] OS=[Unix]

Dominic Hamon wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, >>> I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old >>> non-folding functionality for debugging purposes. >>> >> >> this plan