similar to: samba4 size

Hi, I am building a NAS that only has a couple of SATA disks attached (no USB, no CD/DVD, no NFS, no ...). Since the available space for the rootfs is limited (only 8 MB), I'd like to omit libiconv because this library takes 875 Kbytes. The filesystem on the disks will be ext3. UClibc is built with WCHAR support. Can I build Samba 3.3.8 without libiconv and still have unicode filenames

Hi, I have cross compiled samba 3.3.8 for arm, which succeeded. However, the size of the resulting binaries is large (few MB's per binary) so the total installation of samba sums to over 50 megabytes, after stripping the binaries. For example, with samba 2.0.10, the size of smbd was 281 KB. With samba 3.3.8 that is 5.2 MB. Same goes for the other binaries. It looks as if there is a chunk of

Hi, i would like to inspire a discussion on why samba4 has nearly no adaption on home/small business routers firmware. I recently switched from my old Asus-N16 running tomato to a WRT-1200AC and was researching potential firmware's that i could run. We have a new synology disk-station at work that runs Samba 4.x and it works great. So i was surprised to notice that 3 years after the 4.0

I have always been using ebitbin to set the 3GB switch in the windows binary, but version 2.2.1 has this set as default (which I verified using dumpbin). However, when I generate junk data to fill up my memory and read the memory usage using gc(), it seems that I am not getting as good results with 2.2.1 patched as I was with 2.2.0 after I edited the header. Under R 2.2.0 I was able to use over

Hi all, I'm a little bit worried about the sheer size of the resulting binaries of a project using LLVM. The medium large project for which I'm planning to use it (which currently uses a custom dynamic code generator), produces a compact 1.6 MB binary. When I compile LLVM's simple 'Fibonacci' example project the executable is 2.6 MB. I realize LLVM is a complex and

Hi, I've been doing some tests using serialize() to a raw vector: df <- data.frame(runif(50e6,1,10)) ser <- serialize(df,NULL) In this example the data frame and the serialized raw vector occupy ~400MB each, for a total of ~800M. However the memory peak during serialize() is ~1.2GB: $ cat /proc/15155/status |grep Vm ... VmHWM: 1207792 kB VmRSS: 817272 kB We work with very

Hi all, I want to use the LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS support to create an installed toolchain image (via the install-distribution target). I'd also like the installed binaries to be stripped. If you're invoking a cmake install script directly, you can pass -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP=1 to cmake to request stripping. The install-* targets set up by LLVM's build system don't seem to

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:01 AM, David Piepgrass <dpiepgrass at mentoreng.com> wrote: >> A LLVM JIT compiler for x86 under 1 MB? I doubt it is possible without >> a major rewriting of LLVM. > > Even with no optimizations? Drat. That means I can't use it. Why? I'd never checked, but I always assumed the LLVM JIT was much larger than 3.4 MB. For comparison: [rnk at

Presumably one could stream over the data twice, the first to get the size, without storing the data. Slower but more memory efficient, unless I'm missing something. Michael On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > Jorge, > > what you propose is not possible because the size of the output is > unknown, that's why a

Today, I noticed that a completely clean build of wxRuby on my desktop machine is about 5.8 megs, but on my laptop is about 9.8 megs. Both computers are running Debian GNU/Linux, but my laptop is more of a mix of releases, whereas my desktop is almost entirely Sarge/Testing. Both are using gcc 3.3.3. In both cases, I did a full "get", and did a make from scratch. Any ideas about

Hi, I am currently experimenting with LLVM to provide native code compilation services for a project of mine I call Objective- Smalltalk, and so far quite pleased with the results. I was able to JIT-compile some functions that send Objective-C messages, and now look forward to compiling full methods. I do have a couple of questions that I haven't been able to answer after looking

The *.shared targets require -shared on powerpc, and -R leads to linker errors. This patch makes the -R an arch define. ia64 at least requires -R. --- ash/Makefile +++ ash/Makefile 2003/11/27 15:04:02 @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ $(STRIP) $(PROG) $(PROG).shared: $(OBJS) $(LIBS) - $(LD) $(LDFLAGS) -o $(PROG).shared -e main $(KLIBSRC)/interp.o $(OBJS) -R $(KLIBSRC)/libc.so $(LIBGCC) + $(LD) $(LDFLAGS)

I've got a simple (32bit) windows application (compiled in Borland c++ builder): int *p; while(1) { p = new int[10000000]; //allocates 40 MB of memory } on Windows XP it crashes after 50 iterations (i.e. 2 GB allocated) but on wine it crashes after 30 iterations (1200 MB allocated) is it impossible to use 2gb of memory in wine? why only 1.2GB is available? I've got wine 0.9.13,

Hi, I have two 320 GB SATA disks (/dev/sda, /dev/sdb) in a server running CentOS release 5. They both have three partitions setup as RAID1 using md (boot, swap, and an LVM data partition). # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1]

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:54 PM, <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > Problem > ------- > > Instrumentation for PGO and frontend-based coverage places a large amount > of > data in object files, even though the majority of this data is not needed > at > run-time. All the data is needlessly duplicated while generating archives, > and > again while linking. PGO name data

Hi all i have a rhel5 server with 3GB of RAM and 4 xen guests running: - 1 Windows 2003 + Citrix PS 4.5 with 1 GB - 2 Rhel5 guests with cluster suite and GFS with 640 MB of ram in each one - 1 rhel5 guest with 512 MB of RAM Total: 2.816 MB of RAM Dom0 "only have" 256 MB of ram. Is sufficient or do I need to assign more RAM on dom0? For guests, this ram is sufficient

Hi, Last week I finished installing a small network in a private school : one server (an old IBM X225), seventeen desktops (Fujitsu Siemens PIV 2.4 GHZ, 512 MB RAM, 40 GB HD), all running CentOS 5.5. One extra machine is acting as a router, in that it is installed between the DSL modem and the network, with two Ethernet cards, and it's taking care of DHCP, DNS, NTP and also acts like a

Hi All, I ran the following lines in R: print(object.size(a <- rep(1,10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(a <- rep(3.542,10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- rep("x",10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- rep("xyzxyz xyz",10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- 1:10^6),units="Mb") print(object.size(b

To install Oracle Database 10g, I need to increase the swap memory to 1004 MB. [root at server OpenBravo]# rpm -ivh oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] This system does not meet the minimum requirements for swap space. Based on the amount of physical memory available on the system, Oracle Database 10g Express Edition

Please, I have a 2GB computer and a huge time-series to embedd, and i tried increasing memory.limit() and memory.size(max=TRUE), but nothing. Just before the command: > memory.size(max=TRUE) [1] 13.4375 > memory.limit() [1] 1535.875 > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 209552 5.6 407500 10.9 350000 9.4 Vcells 125966 1.0 786432 6.0 496686 3.8