similar to: Designate one samba server for home directories

good morning all, i have an interesting issue with browsing. details: i have three subnets. (subnet1, subnet2, and subnet3) i have a samba server on each subnet. (samba1, samba2, and samba3) i have a windows 2000 server on subnet1. (m$1) samba1 is the domain master and wins server with ip 192.168.0.1 win2k clients authenticate to their local server and wins is set to 192.168.0.1. when i run a

I am planning to upgrade the DCs using the join and promote method. List of DCs ----------- 1) SAMBA1 2) SAMBA2 3) DC1 4) DC2 Currently SAMBA1 is the PDC and SAMBA2 is the "SDC" and are in sync with replication and rsync sysvol. DCs SAMBA1 and SAMBA2 are 4.1 git releases with AD Schema version 47. My plan to get to AD Schema version 69 was... 0. Add entries to the DHCP Server for the

I'm configuring a HA-cluster to share disks using heartbeat from http://www.linux-ha.org/ Two machines, lets call them server1 and server2 share the same disk with an ocfs2 file system. However, the two machines have separate disks for their OS installations. The two physical servers have two gigabit nics each and on those nics I place four virtual IP addresses which heartbeat makes sure is

Hello List, I have a special L2 VPN connected samba deployment setup and I want to make sure the name resolution arrangement is the best for the network. Setup : network 1 + Samba1<<SAME IP range>> <L2 VPN> network2 <<SAME IP range>> + Samba2 I have noticed that the wins server and wins support options are non-inclusive. Samba2: name resolve order =

Dear all For some reasons I would like to run two samba installations (/opt/samba1 and /opt/samba2) on the same host. Is such a dual installation supported? If yes, what do I have to consider? With many thanks Paul ******* <br> Notice: The information contained in this message is intended only for use of the individual(s) named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or

> Get rid of samba3 by demoting it again as you did last time, search > through sam.ldb for any mention of samba3 and samba4 (you will > probably have to use '--cross-ncs' with ldbsearch or lbdedit), then > remove them. > Now start again with a new DC, but this time, call it anything but > samba3 or samba4. Getting worse and worse .... I demoted samba3 and then also

Hi All, Is anybody succeed to run a configuration on a two node clusters with Samba installed on each machine? I compiled two versions on different directories (/usr/local/samba1 and samba2). At this point, I can run 2 samba's on one node in case of failure but problems are on Active Directory authentication for the Fallback node. Any suggestion! I'm running AIX 5.2 with HACMP and

Here is my scenario when a client wants to resolve a name on my local network: CLIENT --> VPN --> SAMBA --> DNS The client is set up like so: DNS1 = ISP DNS1 (204.26.64.1) DNS2 = ISP DNS2 (204.26.80.3) WINS1 = my samba1 (10.10.1.5) WINS2 = my samba2 (10.10.1.8) This all _seemed_ to have worked 3 days ago for roughly 6 months but stopped suddenly without me doing anything. When the

Hi, I am getting an I/O error while running fsstress on client samba mount point (only with smbfs) Can anyone, please look into this problem? Problem Description: x370 was configured for samba server & x206f as samba client. fsstress was running from two samba mount points from client i.e /SAMBA1 (type cifs) & /SAMBA2 (type smbfs). There was no load generating on /SAMBA2 & hence

for users defined on the PDC. However, I am setting up a second Samba server and want it to join the domain so I can use "security = domain". Lets call the PDC samba1 and the new samba client samba2. ON samba 1, I did: useradd -c 'Samba2 SAMBA' -d /dev/null -M -g 202 -s /bin/false -u 1503 samba2\$ passwd -l samba2\$ smbpasswd -a -m samba2\$ to create the trust account. Then

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:39:53 +0000 Paul Littlefield via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am planning to upgrade the DCs using the join and promote method. > > List of DCs > ----------- > 1) SAMBA1 > 2) SAMBA2 > 3) DC1 > 4) DC2 > > Currently SAMBA1 is the PDC and SAMBA2 is the "SDC" and are in sync No, SAMBA1 is a DC and SAMBA2 is another

Hi, currently I have the following Samba 3.0.2rc2 setup: [w2k 1] --- [Samba1] ----VPN Link---- [Samba2] --- [w2k 2] Samba1 and Samba2 are PDC's, there is one domain for each network. I'm trying to configure a symmetric trust relationship between them. Both Samba servers have "wins support = yes", and I added the other server/domain to their wins.dat (notably the line with the

Hi, can I establish interdomain trust between two domains across NAT. If yes, please how??? Thank you, Sopik Bronislav

Thanks to the four people who replied to my original posting (appended below, subject "Win95 problem"). I've made progress but have now hit a new problem. The solution to the original problem (How do you make a "standalone" client "log on to the network"?) was simply to tick the "Server Type/Log on to network" checkbox in the dialup properties.

Hi... I have 2 samba servers..... Samba1 and Samba2 All my win9x boxes will authenitcate and login to Samba1.... thus using Samba1's netlogon login.bat script.... In this script, is a command that maps a drive letter to a share on Samba2 I also have a command that maps a different drive letter to a share on Samba1 If the win9x box reboots and logs in.... all commands in the login.bat work...

Hi Folks, I'm part of a Novell department that is working on moving from Novell NDPS printing to Samba printing. I have been told that the Samba environment will have to be clustered to assure the same level of redundancy for printing. Does anyone have any pointers? Whether actual experience in this or a location of good documentation of the clustering process? Thanks for

Hello, after the update from Samba version 2.2.8a to samba-3.0.4 I have a big slowdown. The configuration at the moment is like this: samba1 --> Still running 2.2.8a on Solaris. Configured as a PDC. Workgroup A samba2 --> 3.0.4 on Solaris Workgroup A security = server; password server = samba1 samba3 --> 3.0.4 on Solaris Workgroup

Hello, now with "ldbsearch --cross-ncs ..." I dont find entries of domain controllers anymore except samba1 and samba2. sam.ldb seems to be clean now. But with the DNS-Tool from Windows I can see a lot of entries for samba3, all of them for services like _gc, _kerberos, _ldap, _kpasswd. Can this be the reason for the error I get when I join samba5 ? Do I have to delete this entries ?

>> From: "Mark Hazen" <mhazen@franklin.uga.edu> >> Subject: Re: Network Neighborhood comment fields and Samba >> >>Have you tried commenting that string out in your smb.conf file, and letting >>the string be set first in the individual configs? That'd be my first >>suggestion. I have tried that, and that just forced the default comment of:

I have Samba 3.0.21c installed on Fedora Core 3 and would finally like to get rid of the cleartext passwords on our server. The current smb.conf file [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP wins server = 10.0.0.1 security = share encrypt passwords = No [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = no guest ok = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes This is