similar to: How to create a new share

Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC? -- Jason A. Nunnelley JasonN.com is my website - all opinions expressed were mine at some point.

Currently the resize command is under filesystem, and takes a path to the mounted filesystem. This seems wrong to me. Shouldn''t it be under device, and take a path to a device to resize? Otherwise, how can a resize operation when you have multiple devices make any sense? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to

Hallo, H. Peter, Du meintest am 25.06.13: >> We could probably fabricate a script of some sort to check for the >> required version of gnu-efi, and skip it if not found, unless the >> user explicitly requested that the EFI files be built, in which case >> we'd error out. >> >> Thoughts? > Not really... let's just document "make bios". By

Just compiled a custom kernel, but unable to mount a btrfs partition. It essentially says ''unrecognized filesystem''. What could be missing? # File systems # CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y # CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP is not set CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y

Dear all, I wanna create a GNU/Linux that it boots from USB. I don't any idea on that. Can you introduce me a doc that i can use it & i can solve my problem? Cheers, -- ------------------------- Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh email address : mohsen at pahlevanzadeh.org web site : http://pahlevanzadeh.org IRC IM : m_pahlevanzadeh yahoo IM : linuxorbsd ----------------------------

On Tue, 25 Jun, at 01:09:47PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Not really... let's just document "make bios". There's preliminary documentation in doc/building.txt. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

Hallo, Luke, Du meintest am 02.04.16: > Also, when I run testparm -svv | less I can find these four lines on > both the working and non-working servers: > server max protocol = SMB3 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = NT1 > client min protocol = CORE Perhaps a max protocol = NT1 in the global section helps. And

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could help me, I have searched for some reason but cannot find any. After migrating from a previous samba-3.0.10 (I think) PDC server to a newer samba-3.0.23c server on Centos5, I have the strange problem that my XP clients no longer map all the drives listed in the logon.bat during logon, however if I run logon.bat manually after I'm logged in, all

On 04/19/2016 1:44 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>> Found some more info: >>> >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from my DCs (samba 4.2.11) works >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from smbserver (also 4.2.11) does NOT >>> work. > [...] > >>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the

Hi Helmut, Thank you for your mail. The distribution is Debian linux 7.9. I am talking of a fresh installation, and of course of it's update after. Thank you for helping. Regards Le 19 avr. 2016 06:08, "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen at t-online.de> a écrit : > Hallo, Jules, > > Du meintest am 18.04.16: > > > Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive

SYSLINUX 4.00 2010-06-28 EDD Load error - Boot error Booting from USB on old IBM T43 or newer Esprimo E5731E. No problems with version 3.86 and same usb-stick.

Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs

Hi, My company is testing btrfs (kernel 2.6.38) on a slave MySQL database server with a 195Gb filesystem (of which about 123Gb is used). So far, we''re quite impressed with the performance. Our database loads are high, and if filesystem performance wasn''t good, MySQL replication wouldn''t be able to keep up and the slave latency would begin to climb. This though, is

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

On Wed, 26 Jun, at 02:17:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Running "pxelinux": more problems than with 5.10. > > 5.00-pre6: all worked fine > > 5.10: the start menu (GUI) wasn't shown; "tab" showed the labels, and > the textual menus. Invoking the labels worked. > > 6.00: no GUI start menu. "tab" showed the textual menus. Invoking them

>> >> By the way: what about an option "-v" or "--version"? >> >> It's a bit nasty to find the version of syslinux or pxelinux with an >> editor or so ... > > [matt at mfleming-mobl1 syslinux]$ cat version > 5.11 2013 > In addition, when using the Syslinux installers, "-v" and "--version" are already

People.. I'm using samba like domain controller. How i can to do for that a user only logs in one machine of my domain? He can't be logged in most of one machine at the same time! Example: John its logged in the machine "florida" I can't let that he logs in another machine while doesn't log off. I tried resolve this problem killing the process (PID), but not too

I've been googling that for a long time, but couldn't find an answer. I also checked the python-samba Debian (ubuntu) package contents and even compiled samba 4.0.0 alpha8, and checked its python libraries, but couldn't find anything regarding viewing the shares contents there. Is it possible to list samba shares and their contents of a particular host?

Dear samba list, Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive version of samba4 in production ? Or what will be please the best pratices ? Thank you for your advices Best Regards -- Jules HOUANTONON *Phone* : (00229) 97578914 *Email *: juleshoueto at gmail.com *Skype* : houantonon *linkedin* : www.linkedin.com/in/jhouantonon/en

I have a couple computers running 2.6.38 (Ubuntu Natty 2.6.38-8-generic), and on both of them "btrfs device scan" comes back with nothing other than "failed to read /dev/sr0" One computer has a btrfs RAID-1 volume, and the other has two separate btrfs filesystems. The results are the same whether the filesystems are mounted or not. Why is "btrfs device scan" not