similar to: can samba keep uid/gid/permission on a per-file-base?

Need your help! I'm very confised and tired, tried a lot of variants but still at the start, even lost all understanding how the permissions and masks works. Please write me a config for the following case: There is a directory: '/home/shared/door', owned by 'michael:office' shared via samba as '[door]' How can I configure the FS and samba to let 'michael'

We use rsync a lot to backup various stuff over bigger distances and its my project to look deeper into this backups to optimize backup. While its easy to make rsync print the size of the files it is transferring I didnt figure out how to determine how much bytes are actually transferred per file which is even more interesting. If I sync a whole data-structure with 100.000 files lets assume 1000

Hello: I have an nt domain comprised of a samba/openldap pdc with windows xp sp2 clients. *samba 3.0.28a-1 slapd 2.4.9-0 smbldap-tools 0.9.4-1 Ubuntu 8.04 Server LTS Windows Xp SP2 * I have two problems which I think are related. - using "gpresult" from an xp client on the domain, the user is not shown as being a "Power Users", even with their primary group (-g) set to

Months ago there was a thread here about the implementation of a simple undelete-function (i.e: dont delete files, but move them to a folder). Is this this still a relevant idea or has this feature low priority ? thanx, peter ps: anyone knows about a 3rd-party software (propably on nt-side) that implements such a feature ? -- mag. peter pilsl phone: +43 676 3574035 fax : +43 676 3546512

I have some (for testing) Debian based client/workstation connected to my AD. Signing to the AD works as a domain/user should. These clients can, via Nautilus file manager, access shares on the file server manually that the *signed in domain user* is permitted to "see". I would prefer to connect these files and the domain user home directory automatically at sign in without manual

You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more reliable over an unreliable connection. I've been using: remote -fstype=fuse,allow_other,nodev,noatime,reconnect,ServerAliveInterval=15,ServerAliveCountMax=40,uid=0,gid=0,ro,nodev,noatime :sshfs\#root at remote.host.com\:/ BTW, I'm not sure

I'm thinking about upgrading our NT4-clients to XP in the near future and I want to know how well XP is supported by SAMBA in the recent samba-versions. I found many single statements in usenet, but I wonder if there is a kind of XP-FAQ out there. (The one at samba-page is very outdated) Especially I need to know how well XP integrates in a existing NT4-domain (samba as PDC). Then I need

samba2.07,nt4sp6a I run a samba-server with 15nt-clients on a 100MBit-Switch. Now I faced extremely poor performance and really have no idea why. I even dont know if it can be a samba-problem. When copying myriads of small file from a client to the server or vice versa I get bad performance: 1000 files a 16kb: ~80seconds = 200kb/second But this is highspeed compared to copying from nt to nt:

Hi, I have just put Samba3alpha23 on my Suse 8.1 box and and implement the new goup structure in LDAP. All works fine expect when you log in a a user other than root on the windows box. The error is : [2003/04/08 13:30:19, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(2198) ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (Insufficient access)ldapsam_open: cannot access

So far, so good with 1.9.18p1 on HPUX 10.20 (kudos to the Samba team!). However, I've got a question.... I'd like to be able to restrict access to some of our services, and can certainly do so with the "hosts allow = " entry in smb.conf - it does exactly what I want. But... I plan on bringing Samba up on a few campus hosts, some of which have more extensive listings of PCs I

New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5

Hello there, I have a samba PDC 3.0.0 running ok, but I had turned on the option "Time Server" in smb.conf, to synchronize the workstations time with server. But the workstations synchronize 1 hour less than it is. I think that the workstations isn?t considering the daylight saving time. I?m using the command: net time \\server /set /yes Thank?s, []?s Tercio

Hi I actually had this same problem when running up samba originally. Check that the user has a valid unix acount and that you have added that to the folder share/valid users section. B -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ricker [mailto:rickera2@SLU.EDU] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 5:21 AM To: David Brodbeck Cc: Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Some users can't log in -- server shows

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 Summary: please don't use client-server model for local copies Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/400489/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi, after trying sshfs to mount a remote file system on a server with the result that sshfs will sooner or later get stuck and require a reboot of the client, I'm fed up with it and am looking for alternatives. So next I would like to use NFS over a VPN connection instead. To minimize the instances of the NFS mount getting stuck, it might be helpful to use autofs. What happens when the

Hi, I'd like to hear off-list from anyone who is currently successfully using folder redirection with an NT4 domain controller. If you are doing this, please would help me to understand your secret. There are two ways I know of that should work, however I have received feedback from separate sources that claim problems with both of these methods. I would like to include in the new book

Hi, Thank you for replying. User home directory creation is working without the need to edit /etc/pam.d/common-session The logon script I mentioned here is a in-house script to handle directory mounting for file server access, and create shortcut on the account desktop for different logins. On my Linux machines, currently all is done manually by local user account creation and by adding the

Hi, I'd like to ask you what do you limit Desktops syncing in case users put large files on them, e.g. films. Downloading / uploading such large files can generate lots of unnecessary traffic. Is there any kind of filtering possible ? Other solutions ? Cheers, -- Michal Kurowski perl -e '$_=q#: 13_2: 12/o{>: 8_4) (_4: 6/2^-2; 3;-2^\2: 5/7\_/\7: 12m m::#;

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad

Hi there I am wanting to call sshfs (auth via DSA keys) via a rsync pre-xfer bash script, and cannot get something right. If I run it from the cmdline line: env - sshfs usern@server:/share /dir/path -o -o IdentityFile=/tmp/id_dsa it mounts it just fine. (note the "env -" - I specifically tested with no environment to try to make the two situations identical). If I put that sole line