similar to: Copying of large file is failed

Ok.. Just for the record, I STAND CORRECTED! The problem does appear to be NT.. The thing that irritated me was that nobody was interested in giving any backup data! Everyone just wanted to blindly admit that it must be NT. Ok.. Enuf bitching.. On to the better stuff... Anyway, David Mansfield and I are trying to narrow down the machine configurations where this happens.. Currently, we've

I''ve locked up my dom0 a couple of times this morning copying a 3GB file from local disk to an NFS mount(neither xend nor guests running). I don''t encounter this problem on the stock CentOS 4 kernel. The machine is a PowerEdge 2850 with 2 e1000 cards - the one in use is connected to a PowerConnect 2216 10/100 switch and has negotiated 100Mbit. I''ll check if the stock

I previously posted this to the linux.samba mailing list. I'm not sure that was the right place, so here it is again. Apologies if you've already seen it. Hi, I would really appreciate any hep with a big problm I'm having with XP (Pro / SP1 ) transferring to a samba share. The transfer starts off OK, using about 66% of my 100Mbs network. Then, after about 10-15 seconds, it drops off

Suse Linux Enterprise Server 9 SP3 I've tried to create a large 5TB file system using both reiserfs and ext3 and both have failed. I end up with only a 1.5TB file system. Does anyone know why this doesn't work, what to do to fix it? Others have suggested that only XFS or JFS will work. Is this so? Thanks, -Mark

I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17mb down. I have ruled out iptables, nics (because same result on both nics), cables, cable modem(with

We are in the process of an Asterisk call center deployment using IAX2 G711 ulaw softphones. Outbound sound quality is terrible. This week we rebuilt the entire LAN with Cisco 2950-EI switches and have employed QoS on the switches and router. Still sounds terrible. What we are now finding is that the network card in the PC may be the key to the problem. A Dell Optiplex P4 2.4GHz 512MB

Hello all, I have a printing problem with NT, Samba 1.9.18p8 and Debian Linux 1.3 (Kernel 2.0.32). I defined a printer share, which works fine with Win95, but it does not print with NT 4.0 SP3 and NT 3.51. After installing the "EnablePlainTextPassword" registry entry NT4.0 is able to browse, connect and use a file system share on the printserver, but it can not print to the same

List, When i copy large files (200mb+) from any of 2 systems: - Centos 5.2 with Samba version 3.0.28 - FreeNAS-i386-embedded-0.686.4.3374 running Samba version 3.0.28 My Windows XP with Service pack 3 hangs... I had the same issue before and i found a fix for it but i cannot find it anymore... I saw some posts about posix locking but that is not the issue i have (i think).. Any thoughts ?

On Tuesday, June 30, 1998 2:25 PM, cmc@mind.org wrote: >Something I'm actually familiar with. Wow. > >First off, the 3C595 card does *not* support full-duplex at 100mb. >It supports 10mb at half or full duplex and 100mb at half duplex >only! I researched this only 2 weeks ago, check on 3com's site if >you're not convinced. Backing off to half-duplex won't fix this

Hello, I have installed CentOS 5 onto a server this afternoon using NFS. The NFS 'server' has a 100Mb/full-duplex interface, the server I installed CentOS on to has 4 x 100Mb interfaces. However, the installation was painfully slow to start with, and by using ctrl-alt-f2/f4/f5 I could see that contact with the NFS server was intermitently failing. Soon after some of the packages had

I've got an aggravating problem as described in the subject line above. I have a small home network with a Linux box running Samba and acting as both local and domain master browser and WINS server. Also on the network are a desktop PC (Dell 1.4 GHz P4) running Windows 2000 Professional and a laptop running Windows XP Professional. The problem occurs when I try to copy a file over 1 MB

Hi, I have posted this issue once but have not yet had a reply to it. Not sure maybe no one has an answer but I will try again. I have a linux box running SuSE 8.2 with samba 2.2.7-a58. Everything works well except when clients workstations copy files to their workstations, in particular my client running Mac OS X. Mac OS X supports the SMB protocol. I had a look at the logs but could not see

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 Bug ID: 13321 Summary: Rsync --copy-dest issue Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: Anatoly.Penkov at

The short version. Copying over SFTP to our centos boxes maxes out at 2MB a sec. The Question: Is there some sort of speed limitation somewhere in the ssh/sftp daemon? Does anyone have any idea why this could be happening? The long version We have centos 4.6 installed on 2 different machines, different hardware, different nics. Even on 2 different subnets. I've tried different switches,

Hi, we are currently considering different options for rolling out a large scale IP PBX to handle around 3,000 + concurrent calls. Can this be done with Asterisk? Has it been done before? I really would like an input on this. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

after update from samba 3.0.30 to 3.3.3. i can't login to windowsXP machines (SP2, SP3) with some user's accounts i got already these error message: "The system cannot log you in due to the following error: Procedure number is out of range" with some user's accounts all works right, but with some accounts is these error. My configuration is now same as before the update,

My first message didn''t get to the list, so I am trying once more. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: anatoly techtonik <techtonik@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:46 PM Subject: Low memory corruption - trap invalid opcode ip:7f5c688028b0 sp:7ffff97af848 error:0 in ld-2.11.2.so[7f5c687ef000+1e000] To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com I was redirected here from this

I have to provision several dozen * users to a seperate building on our campus in the same subnet. Ordinarily, I'd just run a gigabit cat6 cable to another switch if it doesn't violate the 100 metre rule, but this building is several hundred metres away from my backbone. My only option for cabling to the remote building is copper. My plan is to provision them with a Linux bridge with 4

On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 22:33:37 +1000, samba@samba.org wrote: >Hi, > >I have problems with samba 2.0.5a amd my 3com 3c905b in 100 mbit mode: >writing performance: about 7,5 MB/s (ide hdd !!) That's pretty high! Seems you're using a switch. I just get 3,5 MB/s in both directions using 905b NIC's and a hub, +-100kb, usually reading is slightly higher than writing. (my clients

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:14 PM, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:05:46 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev said: >> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote: >> > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 13:54:05 +0300, Anatoly Pugachev said: >> >> Hello! >> >> >> >> Can someone please help me in building