similar to: CTDB Samba Deployment

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I just set up a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes. In /var/log/log.ctdb I saw the following error many times: - ---------- ERROR: samba tcp port 445, is not responding - ---------- the command "ctdb scriptstatus" is showing: - ---------- root at fs1:~# ctdb scriptstatus 11 scripts were executed last monitor cycle 00.ctdb

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Hi All, Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP backend for Winbind: RID vs. AD or tag Winbind to a primary CTDB node and point other nodes to authenticate from AD via proxy primary CTDB node? /etc/sysconfig/ctdb on all nodes is as follows:

Hi Can anyone advise me on "kernel oplocks" in a ctdb cluster. I have a ctdb (GPFS is the parallel file system) setup that uses samba (3.5.8) for cifs and IBM CNFS for NFS. Reading the documentation on kernel oplocks it seems to me that I can export the same area via samba and NFS with "kernel oplocks = Yes" . My logic is that IBM CNFS has shared NFS locking

Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this has already been covered somewhere, but I've had a look and can't find it. Also if there is a better place for this question, please let me know. I know that the CTDB documentation states that only NFS2/3 are supported with CTDB but what I'd really like to know is why NFS4 won't work and if NFS4 support is planned for the future (timeline?).

Hello, I try to set up a clustered samba server (on Novell SLES11SP2) based upon CTDB and NFS. My problem is that I do not yet understand the structure of the setup when using NFS. I followed the documentation in http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_Setup#Setting_up_CTDB_for_clustered_NFS As far as I understand this documentation, it should be possible to set up a samba cluster say having 3

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

Hi folks, I'm trying to delete an entry in the idmap database in a ctdb-managed cluster, but I get: "Could not remove gid to sid mapping" when doing: # wbinfo --remove-gid-mapping=956781,S-1-5-21-861567501-1417001333-682003330-493603 Could not remove gid to sid mapping or # wbinfo --set-gid-mapping=18400,S-1-5-21-861567501-1417001333-682003330-493603 Could not create or

Hi , I have set up a 2-node CTDB cluster serving NFS and CIFS authenticating Windows and Linux users via Active Directory. The setup works fine, except only one server in the CTDB-cluster is able to join the AD domain at a given instance. If you manually add the other server into AD, the already connected server gets disconnected. There is no specific error message logged in /var/log/message or

I'm working on building a CTDB/Samba cluster on AIX 7.1 with the latest levels to replace an older one running CTDB 1.0.113 and Samba 3.6.1. I have the new servers up and running and they seem to work, but I'm worried about some messages in the logs. I run with log level 1 on the servers so that the connection details are logged. On the old cluster there were only connection/closed

No problems building samba 3.2.5, but having a link error with 3.2.6. Haven't been able to find a solution. Compiling nsswitch/wins.c Linking nsswitch/libnss_wins.so /tmp/ccvWgbGU.o: In function `main': mount.cifs.c:(.text+0x1f29): undefined reference to `unlock_mtab' mount.cifs.c:(.text+0x1f33): undefined reference to `lock_mtab' mount.cifs.c:(.text+0x1f7a): undefined reference

Hello, I'm receiving the following warning when building S4rc5 on CentOS 6.3. I have installed the ctdb and ctdb-devel (1.0.114.3 ) packages included with CentOS. The only thing I could find on Google is someone with the same problem around a year ago, but that went unanswered. Thanks for any help! building without cluster support: CHECK_SRVIDS control missing

After upgrading a test machine to Sernet's 3.4 package, it looks like the "net" command is gone. This was definitely there in the redhat-supplied 3.0 build and I thought it was there in sernet's 3.3 build too. I installed all the rpm's - samba3-client, samba3-utils, samba3-cifsmount.... am I missing something? -- Adam Cohen / IT Manager Energy Biosciences Institute /

<<[Samba] [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.1 Available for Download.eml>> ********* *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* ********* Michael Adam wrote: > That is right: the link creation in source/bin is fixed, > but the installation of the links is still broken. > > It _is_ fixed in the v3-3-test branch which will be used for > 3.3.0 (scheduled for December). The changes to the Make

Hi Experts, When copying a big file from Windows to a Samba share working with the normal TDB mode rather than CTDB mode, the Windows client disconnected from the network ungracefully such as cable unplugging or network disabling. Then, try to delete the partial transferred file from another client, we will be prompted that another program is using this file. The lock can be easily observed by

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Hi Jeremy, Thanks so much for your reply! As a matter of fact, we did just that around 3:45p yesterday when our CTDB cluster was unable to self-heal from the latest in this series of failover events. Here's how the situation went down: 1) We saw flapping identical to that described in my original post 2) After about 30 minutes of waiting, CTDB was just spinning with `smbd` repeatedly

Hello Volker, I was able to get those level 10 logs - spitted by machine. Unfortunately I don't know how attachments behave - Groupwise seems not to be happy with those - so I try the redundant way: Here are the logfiles for this event (only one machine, one try): https://www.bitmammut.de/WDR/log.klnmszap32 In this file there are about 3 occurrences of the

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba