similar to: HPUX and Samba 3.023 question

I'm basically using the instructions found in the HP-UX readme with the exception that I am trying to use the version of openldap that is in iexpress instead of the one from hpux.cs.utah.edu. The recommendations listed in the doc are: HP-UX 11.00 and 11.11: OpenLdap 2.1.3 (http://hpux.cs.utah.edu) OpenSSL 0.9.7d (http://hpux.cs.utah.edu) HP-UX 11.23 only: ixOpenLdap

Just a short question: How can a W2008 R2 64 bit Server be joined to samba 3.5.8 Domain? ----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 T?bingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de -----------------------------------------------

Hi, our setup is Samba 3.3.12 as the Trusted Domain (Domain name: SAMBA) Windows 2008r2 as the Trusting Domain (Domain name: W2008) The trust itself works quite well, users of the SAMBA Domain are able to log into the workstations of the W2008 domain and even roaming profiles are working. However, when I try to configure permissions on a share of the W2008r2 server to users from the SAMBA

Sat, 06 Dec 2014 07:19:29 +1300 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: >On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 11:50 +0300, ?????? wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Having problem to join Samba as BDC in existing domain >> >> PDC - w2003 >> >> Partition[DC=MKS,DC=lan,DC=net] objects[10114] linked_values[0] >> Refusing to replicate

Hi All Having problem to join Samba as BDC in existing domain PDC - w2003 Partition[DC=MKS,DC=lan,DC=net] objects[10114] linked_values[0] Refusing to replicate DC=NN\0ADEL:9aac4878-b274-4bf6-92aa-4f42e40d1c43,DC=MKS,DC=lan,DC=net from a read-only repilca into a read-write replica! Failed to convert object DC=NN\0ADEL:9aac4878-b274-4bf6-92aa-4f42e40d1c43,DC=MKS,DC=lan,DC=net:

Dear all, could someone explain in short about raising the domain function level to W 2008 R2. I thougt I did provision my samba4 DC as W2008 R2 function level, but my domain level show has an output like??: samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function

Dear all, My , samba-tool domain level show shows me it is W2003: [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=tplk,DC=loc' Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Can I raise without issues to W 2008 R2? Or should I stay with 2003? Greetings

I found on some CPUs an ACPI based HVM chews up a lot of CPU time versuses an APIC HVM, so in Windows I would change the computer type in device manager to "Standard PC" and disable acpi in the domain config. -Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com <xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com> To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi, I had a simple domain under samba 3.5, but because of our company's complex structure, management made a call to move to win2k8 infrastructure. And my task is to do this migration seamlessly as possible. My plan was to upgrade to samba4, then to add win2008 DC, transfer FSMO roles, then demote samba server and shut it down. However, i run into some troubles i couldn't solve... I

I use Samba 3.14.17 and later test Samba 3.6.9. The computer is WINs server on Samba. wins support = yes All work good. But now I see that NetBIOS clients cannot to re-register their names on WINs, when he change IP. >From WinXP SP3 I do nbtstat -RR Answer: NetBIOS-names registered by this computer were changed. >From server: relay2# nmblookup -U 10.0.0.1 -R -S aiy querying aiy on

Hello all, I'm currently investigating the option to completely replace a SBS2003 DC with a Samba4 DC. My research (mostly on samba.org guides) shows that it is feasible, however I'd like to get feedback from the community on my goals. Current status: A Windows SBS 2003 is the PDC and a W2008 R2 server is acting as secondary DC. Domain operational level is 2003. There are ~40-50

Hi! We're trying to figure out the best way to use samba4 in our environment and after testing back and forth we are now left with a question; why would we want to have several samba4 servers? The environment is one HQ with multiple branch offices where each branch office as a network connection to HQ with at least a 2Mbit DSL. The initial idea was to put a samba4 DC in every branch

I upgraded zentyal as far as 6.1 before it stopped upgrading (it won't save changes any more either, so I can't change almost anything) sitting on Samba 4.7 On Sun, Aug 30, 2020, 3:14 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 30/08/2020 10:57, Peter Pollock wrote: > > Yeah, I already tried that, to no avail. > > > > I finally had some

Hi, People: We have a Old (well functioning) Windows 2000 AD domain. We wish migrate DCs, if posible, to SAMBA4.? We actually have four sites with one DC in three of them and three DCs in one of them. Just one DC is Windows 2008, the rest is Windows 2000. Join SAMBA4 as DC automatically is not posible, I think, because DNS servers are not configured with 2008 behaviour and actual DNS entries

May be someone could point me to optimal xm configuration file setting for Dell Power Edge 2950,2G RAM,One Quad CPU 2.0Ghz I need to run SBS 2003 Windows Server as a guest. I already installed it,but it appears very slow.... I mean may be there are some special good practices for low RAM machines. Thanks a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Problems Compiling samba (samba-3.0.21a) on HP-UX 11.00 We have been experiencing some problems compiling samba with the config options below. When compiling the auth_script.c make fails. As a fix, we removed the conditional if/else/endif statements on lines 143/149/155 and it now seems to compile. Has anyone else had any similar problem when compiling without the ldap features or similar

Hello All got a nasty problem that has reared its head this morning. Windows 2003 ADS controller. Samba 3.022 Ubuntu 6.06LTS getent passwd returns users but not all of them. I am missing a couple of hundred. Also if i add a new user they do not appear in getent. however they all show in in wbinfo -u. Has anyone seen this before? I am really up against it with a school full of kids returning

Hello, I have a difficulty with the option 'hide unreadable' in the smb.conf regarding to it's effect on my Vista machines. In the smb.conf I have declared the following share: [userdata] path = /data/userdata admin users = domain+adminuser browseable = yes writeable = yes hide unreadable = yes csc policy = disable The

Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4 Kernel 2.6.17-1.2142 on this server. After upgrade has been completed, I lost the attributes of ownership and groups. I noticed that the uids/gids have changed for all AD accounts. This means that users can't have total access for their files and no access

hello I'm running debian testing, winth samba as P.D.C, with passdb backend = ldapsam ii samba 3.0.23c-1 a LanManager-like file and printer server fo ii slapd 2.3.25-1 OpenLDAP server (slapd) ii smbldap-tools 0.9.2-3 Scripts to manage Unix and Samba accounts st ii libnss-ldap 251-5 NSS module for using LDAP as a naming servic no libpam_ldap