similar to: Rename to open file doesn't work, why?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Rename to open file doesn't work, why?"

2009 Jun 22
2
Samba mounted home shares will break many applications
I didn't get any responses to my previous post "Wine broken on Samba shares due to colon ":" filenames" so I am re-posting with a subject to reflect what I now believe to the the root cause of my problems. I recently changed from mounting my home directory using NFS to mounting with CIFS via the pam module pam_mount.so. It turns out that I am having problems with many
2013 Feb 14
0
missing directories
Sorry for my poor english I have a problem with my shares mounting mount -t cifs //192.168.1.5/test /media/test -o credentials=/etc/smbpasswd in test directory I create 50 directories 'ls' gives me the right number directory but Example (http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/getdents.2.html) C program to display the contents of the directory it does not return all
2019 Mar 01
0
Using Access Control Lists with SMB2/SMB3 Mounts on Linux Clients
Could you see if anything useful in the logs indicating why the ACL was not returned? Instructions are at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS_troubleshooting#Enabling_Debugging (it is easier for newer kernels due to dynamic tracing e.g. "trace-cmd record -e cifs" but even with these older kernels it should be enough information in the dmesg logs - if not a wireshark trace
2019 Mar 01
2
Using Access Control Lists with SMB2/SMB3 Mounts on Linux Clients
Hi Jeremy, Hi Steve, Hi Ronnie, thanks for your replies and the profound discussion. I think, it's best to demonstrate my problem case along an real world example: The following log of a console sesssion shows how I am doing the mounts on behalf Linux Kernel CIFS-FS Module on the client side against a Samba 4.5 file server (both running on Debian Stretch 9.8) via SMB/CIFS resp. SMB2 protocol:
2009 Dec 02
2
User executional bit set when creating/modifying file on linux server from linux client
Whenever I create or modify a file on my cifs-mount, be it by `echo "test" >> file` or from bash, the file mode is changed with u+x. However, that does not happen with touch, and usign chmod u-x works as it should. This is very annoying... It is a linux samba server running samba 3.0.24. I know it's not the latest, and if you know there was a bug fixed that can solve my
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
> > When you provide an exact vers= then no auto-negotiation happens (unless > you pass "vers=3" which essentially means 3.x: use 3.0 or above). You > either get the connection or mount fails. None the less, you can dump > the current SMB ressources managed by the kernel by looking at > /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData if your kernel is recent enough it should show > the SMB
2009 Sep 04
3
2.6.31-rc8: CIFS with 5 seconds hiccups
This is on 32 bit x86 on a Dell 1950 After mouting a cifs share we have 5 second hiccups. Typical log output when doing a simple "ls /mnt": Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 50 Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: total_len 118 Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/inode.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_revalidate (xid =
2008 May 13
3
creating a master share
I am trying to create a master share that contains all the other shares. I created a group that needs read+write permission to all the other shares. However, rather than adding this group in each share configuration, I was wondering if there is a way to overwrite the permission. I tried this but gave read-only access. Also in the linux level, I don't have this master group as the owner. Any
2016 Jan 06
0
Cannot remove symlink with missing target
On 06/01/16 17:36, Andreas Maier wrote: > Hi, > I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that > symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the > client side. > > Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: > > 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: > > $ touch a > $ ln -s a b > $
2008 May 23
3
Somewhat bizzare share issue
I have 19 servers with this smb.conf share definition working: [export] comment = Exported Files path = /tmp/export guest ok = Yes On the 20th server however, this just doesn't want to work. I've gone through the basics of guest access and permissions more than a few times trying to figure this one out. Approaching this from another angle, I tried the following
2008 Dec 09
2
Any possibility to apply policies on WinXP machines using samba 3.2.3 ?
Any possibility to apply policies on WinXP machines using samba 3.2.3 ? In samba documentation in : http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/PolicyMgmt.html There is references to apply policies in NT/2000 Server and winxp clients, but it's not clear to me that will run fine or not using samba 3.2.3+winxp machines. If exist a way, How ? I was create a local policies using
2009 Sep 02
6
Password-less share, for certain users.
Is it possible to have a "password-less" share available to only certain users? I've been searching all over and could not find anything.
2008 Feb 13
1
acl, no rights and possibility to delete files
Hello, I've a samba 3.0.24 and a share in ext3 with acl. I've set on a file the following permissions on a file a.txt : vssamba:/# getfacl /mnt/samba/partage/a.txt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/samba/partage/a.txt # owner: herve # group: users user::rwx group::r-- other::r-- The rights for share "Partage" are : [partage]
2008 May 14
2
monitoring file access levels?
I've got a paranoid client who has a samba server on a small LAN who wants to know if and when any of his employees 'transfer' (read, copy off etc) any more than a certain threshold of data a day from the server, I think he's worried that some employee may grab a lot of stuff off the server and then share it with his competition. I tried to explain that this wasn't a very
2008 Oct 16
3
How does the "guest account" param work?
smb.conf states "This user must exist in the passwd file, but does not require a valid login" What exactly does this mean? As I understand it, adding a user with 'smbpasswd -a nobody' automatically gives it a valid login. My reasons for asking are; I added myself to passdb.tdb with my passwd. I added the 'nobody' user to passdb.tdb with no passwd. I then logged in to
2016 Jan 06
4
Cannot remove symlink with missing target
Hi, I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the client side. Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ ls -l total 0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1
2007 Oct 09
1
recycle: touching failed operation not permitted
Hello In /var/log/messages I have got a lot of errors such as : "recycle: touching .recycle/jankowski/500/500_U/21-10-5U.~TIF failed, reason = Operation not permitted " ~~.tif it's a temp file and I noticed that samba deletes this files to recycle . My smb.conf comment = Rastry public = yes invalid users = @geodeta,@ewidencja, path = /home/samba/rastry
2008 Mar 16
8
HP Deskjet 6940 and 6988
Hello all, Does anybody share HP Deskjet 6940 and HP Deskjet 6988 off a samba server successfully? I currently using Samba versions 3.0.24 Ubuntu Fiesty Fawn in my production environment. I also the issue occurs on my laptop which is running Gutsy Gibbon 7.10 which uses Samba 3.0.26. The issue is when my users try to print multiple copies they can not through the samba server. These printers
2008 Dec 01
2
Specifying proxy server per user
Was wondering if it's possible to assign specific users a proxy server for web browsing. My current setup is openldap, samba pdc and a squid proxy server. Our call center uses the web alot and I'd like to have them use the proxy. The agents don't usually login to the same windows machine. Is this possible via samba or netlogon? I'd hate to have to edit the group policies on 50
2009 Feb 19
1
XP local policy vs Samba pdbedit?
If I set up a room of Win XP Pro w/SP2 systems, hardened via local policy and gpedit.msc, and add them to a samba domain running from an unpatched, out-of-box install of RHEL 5.0, how will the local XP policies differ from any changes I make to pdbedit on the Samba side? Which takes priority/preference? Thanks. Scott