similar to: Slow Samba writes over NFS

Hi... Same problem here, running on CentOS 5.* and 4.5. It was solved by installing the package lockdev. Then you must restart the machine. And problem fixed. ashis.v.purbhoo wrote: > > > Hello... > > Currently in the process of upgrading Samba v2.0.10 to Samba v3.0.x, while > conducting some minimal testing, it turns-out that Samba v3.0.x is > performing slower

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz.sig Many small fixes, plus some more noticeable: + doveadm: Added "move" command for moving mails between mailboxes. + virtual: Added support for "+mailbox" entries that clear \Recent flag from messages (default is to preserve them). - dbox: Fixes to handling

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz.sig Many small fixes, plus some more noticeable: + doveadm: Added "move" command for moving mails between mailboxes. + virtual: Added support for "+mailbox" entries that clear \Recent flag from messages (default is to preserve them). - dbox: Fixes to handling

My LAN is running Samba v2.0.10 on RedHat Linux v7.1 and everything is running great. Not content to leave well enough alone, we will soon be converting all the Win98 clients to Win2K. What kind of Samba-related difficulties, if any, should I expect? Samba exports both shared drives and printers to the client machine on the Network. Client machines are given access to their home drives as

Folks -- I've read the FAQ at samba.org/samba/docs/FAQ, I've searched the mailing list archives for "unexpected network error", I've searched Google for "samba unexpected network error", and been unable to find anything. If there's another source of information that I should check, I'd greatly appreciate a pointer. I'm trying to copy files to Samba

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz.sig Looks like v2.0.10 was a bit troublesome release. I expect this one to last longer. * dotlock_use_excl setting's default was accidentally "no" in all v2.0.x releases, instead of "yes" as in v1.1 and v1.2. Changed it back to "yes". - v2.0.10:

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz.sig Looks like v2.0.10 was a bit troublesome release. I expect this one to last longer. * dotlock_use_excl setting's default was accidentally "no" in all v2.0.x releases, instead of "yes" as in v1.1 and v1.2. Changed it back to "yes". - v2.0.10:

Using Samba v2.0.10 on a RedHat v7.1 box, I see that the Win98 clients on our network are making sporatic requests for user "nobody" (as shown below). Anyone know what's going on here? My network has both Linux and Win98 clients, but only the Win98 clients are showing this behavior. Both the Linux and Win98 clients access the same shared drives, but only the Win98 clients use

Hi, Has anyone had success using a TE410P card in an HP-Compaq DL380 G4 server? For me the card is detected fine, but the system just never sees an interrupt from the card. I've tried everything I can think of. The card definitely works. Its Fedora Core, but we also tried a stock 2.6.10 kernel. We tried with and without Hyperthreading, with "noapic", we disabled all the

greetings, for those of you in the know, may i have some assistance in helping to make better decisions in purchasing more used server toys to install CentOS on please? :-) in the Compaq Proliant Rackmount DL380 line, the one that looks like the older 1850R is called a G1 meaning Generation 1 right? and then the DL380 G2 is a redesign that is gray and just has 6 drive bays up front correct?

greetings i have a few dual P3 Compaq 1850R units and use compaq smartstart 5.5 on them before a CentOS 4 load i have acquired some dual P3 Compaq DL380 G1 i.e. Generation 1 units and am wondering which specific smartstart download i should be using for them from this URL below h18004.www1.hp.com/support/files/server/us/subscription/ssdownloads.asp would someone please share their experience

I'm looking at ordering a server from HP. I checked around on Google and found in the Wiki that the ProLiant DL380 is supposed to be known to work with *. I'm going to get a price quote on the following setup: HP ProLiant DL380 G4 Server w/ the following options: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz/1MB 2GB REG PC2-3200 (2 X 1GB) HP ProLiant Battery Backed Write Cache Enabler for SA6i RAID 1 drive set HP

I''ve got a client demanding the use of HP DL380 G5''s, for various historical reasons, for a server room. I''m going nuts trying to figure out if the available CPU''s for them support VT, so I can avoid building them a separate Windows box. Unfortunately, the local web proxy is overloaded, so actually browsing the JavaScript/image loaded web pages for HP is

Hi Gabriel, > I am having some issues with CentOS 5. [cut] > I am running a clean install of CentOS 5 i386 on a Dell Inspiron 6400 > (Core Due, 1GB RAM) with SELinux on "enforcing". I've just received my new 6400 (T7400, 2GB, 160GB, Vista Home Premium) and I'd like to install CentOS 5 too. With big surprise (looking at the partition table first and then, googling,

Was there any resolution on this I also have a TE410P in an box with an Intel E7501 chipset? -Vickers -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: TE410P card in an HP-Compaq DL380 G4 server Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:13:24 +1030 From: Peter Childs <peter.childs@nec.com.au> Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Am considering a new laptop, and I wonder if anyone here can share their Xen experiences with the newest Core 2 Duo CPUs, ref http://www.intel.com/products/processor/core2duo/specifications.htm The list at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors doesn''t include any Core 2 Duos. Does that mean that people have had problems, or is the wiki just not up to date? I gather

I have CentOS 6.x installed on a "HP ProLiant DL380 G5" server. It has eight 750GB drives in a hardware RAID6 array. Its acting as a host for a number of OpenVZ containers. Seems like every time I reboot this server which is not very often it sits for hours running a disk check or something on boot. The server is located 200+ miles away so its not very convenient to look at. Is

> 2) I had no problem running the V3.0 regression tests according to the instructions. However, the instructions in the Testing Infrastructure Guide for running the Test Suite presume the existence and use of llvm-gcc, http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html, both on-line and in the rc4 kits. Now that llvm-gcc is gone for V3.0, it isn't completely obvious how to run the test-suite

>information a bit closer; it'd find that it's marked accordingly. UDMA2.SYS author now worked around it, it seems you do something with "DPTE" in isolinux.asm but not using it (probably for memdisk or direct floppy/harddisk emulation?). also something about EDD v1.1 and v3.0 specifications and setting bits to 1. Anyway, the driver works now on: BIOS -> cdrom ->

陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: >> 2) I had no problem running the V3.0 regression tests according to the instructions. However, the instructions in the Testing Infrastructure Guide for running the Test Suite presume the existence and use of llvm-gcc, http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html, both on-line and in the rc4 kits. Now that llvm-gcc is gone for V3.0, it