similar to: smbmount deprecated - what about Windows 9x?

Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 When accessed from FC/L (OFM (orthodox filemanager)): CIFS VFS: illegal date, month 0 day: 0 When the share is initially mounted: CIFS: Attempting to mount //hostname/E Use of the less secure dialect vers=1.0 is not recommended unless required for access to very old servers CIFS VFS: Send error

Jeremy Allison via samba composed on 2020-04-23 09:24 (UTC-0700): > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:59:18AM -0400, Felix Miata via samba wrote: >> Items in dmesg when FAT share's are accessed from web browser: >> CIFS VFS: bogus file nlink value 0 > nlink should never be zero. If an SMB server > returns that, then the CIFSFS client will have > to fake it to 1 at least.

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address

I installed samba on a PC running SuSE 10.2, using the version from the SuSE 10.2 repository (3.0.23). All very nice, except smbmount is missing. As I understand it, this would seem to be because the version offered had not been compiled with the --with-smbmount option. Is my interpretation correct? And if so, how can I fix things? Do I have to download the source and do my own compilation

I have samba 3 configured and running fine as a PDC with LDAP as the back end user database. I have most users using roaming profiles but there are a few I would like to be able to only have local profiles. Is it possible to configure samba to use both types of profile rather than one or the other. I have the profile path set on each user account in LDAP as the field

Hi everyone, I'm using the online HOWTO manual in the "Quick Start" reference to try and get a basic domain controller going. So I set up smb.conf, and testparm checked out okay, I've started nmbd and smbd, but when I try to to run [root@localhost samba]#smbclient -L <username> -U<username>%<password> session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE <-- I get

I'm getting only partial iso8859-1 translation from an smbfs mount from my Win98SE machine. The smbfs mounted file system shows most lower-case accented characters fine; but, it substitutes underscores for most of the upper-case accented characters (and a few lower-case ones too): # uname -a Linux elm 2.4.18-8.1mdkian3 #7 Sat Aug 17 15:19:44 EDT 2002 i686 unknown (Mandrake 8.2 Linux with all

One of our users wants to use POP3 with leave-mail-on-server (LMOS). That's great and works well for most people. But for some reason, they MUA (outlook) downloads messages more than once. As the MUA asks for messages, I'm sure it's Outlook's fault, but I was wondering if there is anything that can be done about this on the servern side, or if anyone knows how to fix Outlook.

Am 03.11.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > ?On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote: >> Hi >> >> The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, yesterday and the week after. The default group at example >> The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we use autorid in

Hi all, I have a permissions problem with a samba share which I really can't fathom out. I'm trying to create a fully group writable share. Easy or so I thought. As you can see from my config I am trying all the options to set files group writable, however when I create a file from the client I'm always getting the mode 0644. Does anyone have a clue why? Thanks! client:

Hello, I have the following in /etc/samba/smbfstab; //msserver/share /mnt/smb-share cifs file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777,credentials=/etc/cifsusers/admin,rw However, when using 'mount /mnt/smb_dir' I get; mount: can't find /mnt/smb_dir in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab Using 'mount -a' doesn't mount either. If I use "smbmount /mnt/smb_dir" I get; Could not

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Hello list, I'll first describe my set up: server1 : live server server2 : backup server3 : backup of the backup so the data set is copied in this order server1->server2->server3 they are not done at the same time so there would be no collisions. I use this shell script to back up: for i in a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z `seq 0 9`; do

I'm sure asterisk would make a great stand alone voice mail server. Basically I want to get rid of our voice mail system and replace it with *, but the problem is we use a cisco cluster with skinny clients. So I was thinking the way to contact a * server, would be through our 3640. But so far any attempt has failed. I am wondering if anyone has done something similar. Just want to verify the

Dear All, I am running a two location SOHO network with a Microsoft AD on a Windows 2008 R2 server. In detail, the infrastructure is as follows: Primary location: - 1 DC on Windows 2008 R2 hardware server - 1 DC on Windows 2008 R2 virtual server - 2 DC on Windows 2016 virtual servers (forest functional level 2008) - 1 DC on Samba 4.6.2 on Debian Jessie Secondary location: - 1 DC on Samba 4.6.3

Hi, This patch fixes "Samba Bugzilla Bug 999". The last version (2.6.8.1) of smbfs kernel module do not honor uid, gid, file_mode and dir_mode supplied by user during mount. This bug is also logged as "Kernel Bug Tracker Bug 3330". I think this stuff is related to the "unix extensions". This patch offers to the client side the opportunity to decide to use or

Hi there. I'm using samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 on CentOS release 5.7 x86_64 to mount a Terastation filesystem. The "file_mode" and "dir_mode" options to mount.cifs seem to be ignored; I systematically get a "drwxrwxrwx" permission, no matter what values I provide for these options: # mount.cifs //terastation/Backup /bkp/BackupPC/ -o

Hi, I have detected a very low performance with cp command or any write with CIFS mount (Netapp Storage), <15mb/s. Read performance is similar Local disk perofrmance is correct >100mb/s fstab entry is : //netapp/resource$/folder /mnt/test cifs username=u,password=p,domain=dom,iocharset=utf8,uid=1001,gid=1000,dir_mode=0700,file_mode=0700,auto Server is SLES 12 SP3 with latest updates

Hello all, I have been struggling with a permission issue with Samba for over a week now. I've tried many different setup, without much success. I am using samba 3.6 on Arch Linux. The user I am testing with is a member of the group nobody. I have a share defined as it : security = share [public] path = /home/smbshare public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable =

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting