similar to: Performance issues after samba update (utime?)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Performance issues after samba update (utime?)"

2004 Nov 10
0
dos filetimes = yes is not correctly used? - utime function calls fail (Version 3.0.7)
Hello everbody, this is really urgent. at the moment the status is as follows: We changed the primafy group to a group without german characters: "?,?,?". It works fine, as long as the primary group as full access to the file. If not, it doesn't work. The Problem in detail: Situation 1: User is member of DOMAIN+GROUP. DOMAIN+GROUP is owner of file utime is called and
2004 Nov 01
2
Problem with 3.0.7 - set_filetime
Hi, a more specific subject... -| -----Original Message----- -| From: -| samba-bounces+dirk.laurenz=fujitsu-siemens.com@lists.samba.o -| rg -| [mailto:samba-bounces+dirk.laurenz=fujitsu-siemens.com@lists -| .samba.org] On Behalf Of Laurenz, Dirk -| Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:48 PM -| To: samba@lists.samba.org -| Subject: [Samba] Problem with 3.0.7 -| -| Hello everybody,
2000 Dec 31
1
utime() -> utimes()
ChangeLog says - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2000/09/21 05:11:42 scp.c utime() to utimes(); mouring at pconline.com SCO's Open Server 3 does not have utimes. ... gcc -o scp scp.o -L. -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/ssl -ls sh -lopenbsd-compat -lz -lsocket -lgen -lsocket -los -lprot -lx -ltinfo -lm -lc rypto undefined first referenced
2007 Jul 30
1
Performance problem with utime() on Solaris 8
To all: While updating our Samba installation from 2.2.5 to 3.0.25b, I found that Samba's performance was severely degraded. A 1 gig test file with random text in it would take about 2:15 to copy using the old 2.2.5 smbd, but the same file would take 5-6 minutes to copy with a freshly compiled version. I ran truss on smbd while the file copy was taking place, and found that the utime()
2007 Jul 03
2
utime : operation not permitted
With the upgrade to 1.0.1, I am seeing some errors/warnings dovecot: IMAP(jhorner at arinbe.com): utime(/home/arinbe/Maildir/.info/tmp) failed: Operation not permitted: 1 Time(s) dovecot: IMAP(jhorner at arinbe.com): utime(/home/arinbe/Maildir/.resumes.vabch/tmp) failed: Operation not permitted: 1 Time(s) Different directories on different days. Different users on different days. Always /tmp
2004 Sep 21
1
utime() failed with index file [...] Operation not permitted
Hello, I'm running the dovecot backports from jones.dk. Everything is working fine so far, but whenever someone is logging in (IMAP or POP 3) I get the following error message in my mail.log: [...] pop3(frederik): utime() failed with index file /var/mboxes/frederik/.INBOX/.imap.index: Operation not permitted [...] imap(jako1): utime() failed with index file
2008 May 31
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5506] New: support utime differences at runtime, not configure/build time
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5506 Summary: support utime differences at runtime, not configure/build time Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: All URL: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.rsync.general/1794 8 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:
2005 May 19
1
utime() failed: Value too large for defined data type
i have recently rebuilt dovecot on my mail server as i wanted to add SSL support for it. well, my OpenSSL libs are 64-bit, so what they hey, i'll build dovecot 64-bit as well. worked just fine, no issues at all. the setup is: Solaris 9/SPARC Sun C compiler Dovecot 0.99.14 after rebuilding it 64-bit, i now have a small problem however. I cannot save messages to IMAP folders from Mail.app
2009 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
I'm attempting to use the above as described here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816469/llvm-mingw-installation-on-vista ...and getting the following error when attempting "llvm-gcc -o hello.exe hello.c" llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directory I've heard it may be due to the way GCC is passing args to CreateProcess as in this thread
2000 Aug 23
2
chmod(2) and utime(2) Problems
I am having a problem with my samba config on my web server related to file permissions. The problem seems quite subtle! The samba config file contains (Samba 2.0.7): ----cut here [global] workgroup = UKC server string = University Web Server security = domain encrypt passwords = Yes password server = KNOLE CORFE log file = /var/adm/log/samba.log
1997 Oct 07
4
utime and backing up files
I read in the Samba docs that there is a problem with "utime()" when a user updates another users file the modified time cannot be updated. According to the docs, even if it the file has write permissions set for the non-owner. When I attempt to do a test on a files that is mode 777, I create the file as one user, wait a minute, edit it again as another user, and it changes the modified
2005 Aug 18
0
problem executing windows application in samba
Hi, I've come across a rather strange problem while trying to execute a windows application in samba. I'm running Samba Version 3.0.10-Ubuntu on Linux Ubuntu, kernel 2.6.10-5-386, my full smb.conf is at the end of this message. We have AIMS v3.0.0.3, a database application which accesses data in .mdb files and we've stuck it on a samba share called AIMS. The problem is, when I
2013 Apr 17
3
Attempting to checksum a non-TCP/UDP packet, dropping a protocol 1 packet
Pasi, in http://readlist.com/lists/lists.xensource.com/xen-users/10/50495.html you mention a netback fix without identifying which one. In going over the changes as well as looking at the code, I can''t spot anything related, or see how non-TCP, non-UDP packets could pass checksum_setup(), and hence I don''t really understand how this problem can be considered fixed (for, in the
2010 Oct 01
6
how many people still use NIS?
Hello listmates, I have discovered a very strange SFTP problem which I can not connect to anything but NIS thus far. See here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-server-73/sftp-seems-to-fail-for-nis-accounts-under-openssh-5-x-816020/ http://readlist.com/lists/suse.com/suse-linux-e/38/193419.html Hence the question: is NIS (YP) still in use much anywhere for authentication? Thanks.
2005 Mar 23
1
Problems with Excel & MS Word files (still)
Problem is apparently with locking issues, disabled oplocks in the [general] section, and the problem actually got worse... Here's what happens: User-A part of group1, opens Excel file off of share, saves, exits... User-B (or even User-A for that matter) tries to re-open same file, get error stating it's locked and can only open for read-only access... Both users in the same group, and
2012 May 21
1
3.6.5 and "not_defined_in_RFC4178@please_ignore" error
Hello, We're having trouble joining an AD domain with 3.6.5 This message when running net join looks fishy : "got principal=not_defined_in_RFC4178 at please_ignore" OS : Solaris 10 x64 Kerberos : MIT krb5 1.10.1 DC servers are running Windows 2008 The error message is : ./net join -U aranskis Enter aranskis's password: Failed to join domain: failed to lookup DC info for
2010 Jun 21
3
NFS performance - default rsize
Hi list, We've had an interesting NFS performance issue with the following setup. Clients : CentOS 5.5, kernel 2.6.18-194.el5 Server : Solaris 10 kernel Generic_142901-08 Reading a file (not cached) with dd : dd if=file1 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=100 performance is around.. 700 kB/s ! /proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB If we force rsize to a smaller value, 32kB, the
2011 Apr 12
1
Xen migration fails
Hi, I have been getting the following error (logged in /var/log/xen/xend.log) when I try to migrate a VM from one particular host to the other (the reverse migration works fine). My system was working fine for a long time (i did several migrations in both the directions). I am using Xen-3.4.3 (installed from source code) with CentOS 5.4. I am using drbd to replicate the disks.
2007 Dec 16
1
./configure perfparse -> "configure: error: required library libgd unusable"
I recently had a problem with the configure script from perfparse running properly so that I could 'make install' it to work with Nagios 2.10 on latest CentOS 4.x + RPMForge (see http://readlist.com/lists/centos.org/centos/5/28966.html). Thinking it was a problem that was a result of "yum remove gd", I formatted the box and reinstalled everything. Now, oddly, I still have the
2007 Oct 09
3
permission/acl troubles
Hi list, Since I've upgraded from samba 3.0.23c to 3.0.25c my ACL's don't work as expected anymore. I'm not sure where the problem is, however. The symptoms are simple: with 3.0.23c, I could grant and revoke user, group and world write access to and from files in a share. With 3.0.25c, I can't do that anymore. When I deselect group or world read access and apply the