similar to: HFS filesystem on linux + samba -> Mac

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

I ran into a problem that I couldn't resolve straight away, but would like to solve for sometime in the future. We have a Thecus storage server (similar to a Buffalo TeraByte, if that helps?) that has a Mac filesystem on it. The mother board was failing, but the drives are still OK. A new box has been added, so the urgency is sort of gone. I was going to try and back up the data to a new

I am running a CentOS 3 server with a kernel version -2.4.21-40. I typically use Webmin to accomplish mounting varied filesystems, but this one has me buffaloed. We have a Thecus N5400 that was mounted on a Mac and a ton of data was written to it. All of the data was placed in yearly folders with content-related folders below the yearly folders. When I mount this through Webmin as an smbfs

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam

I tried to install kmod-hfs and kmod-hfsplus but not found ? What is up ? the system is all updated with yum update. Jerry

Hello first, sorry for my bad english but i'm french I'm using totaly Ubuntu Dapper for 4 months, and Wine 0.9.9 I would like to submit you a very usefull software for windows and who doesn't work with Wine : it's Http File Server ( or HFS for close friends :D ) The HFS developer knows that HFS doesn't work with Wine, but doesn't know why, so we need your help :D A

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8333 Summary: crash with hfs-compression.diff and possible fix Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: martinjotte at

OS X 10.4.6 (BSD) I was using the 'standard' versions (i.e. non-HFS supporting) of rsync with the backup -b option so that I could do nightly incrementals. This seemed to be running fine. Changes to existing backed up files got copied to the appropriate path(s) on the target. BUDIR=myDirectoryName time /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -b --suffix=# --backup-dir=$BUDIR / Users

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 Summary: hfs-compression.diff patch incorrectly expands relative directory Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

I dont see anything hfsplus in the modules area??? > uname -r > > 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64 > > [root at nuc5i3 ~]# find /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/ |grep hfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs > /lib/modules/3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8267 Summary: hfs-compression.diff compile fix Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au

I followed the instructions (I thought) for hfsplus on C7. Installed elrepo Then installed hfsplus hfsplus-tools and kmod-hfsplus kmod-hfs rpm -qa | grep hfs clearly shows the items kmod-hfsplus-0.0-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64 hfsplus-tools-540.1.linux3-4.el7.x86_64 kmod-hfs-0.0-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64 When I do my mount command mount -t hfsplus -o loop Mac.dmg /mnt/mac mount: unknown filesystem type

I've tested all these filesystems here: http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/filesystem-metadata-overhead/ -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -------------- next part

Ok so the install has been seamless on a few machines and I decided to try it on my laptop (a Dell D620). I had everything working great and kicked it around a bit and then figured, if I'm going to keep this on my laptop I'll need to reformat everything, enable some encrypted filesystems etc ... not a big deal ... kind of Here's the problem, the laptop has a resolution of 1440x900 and

Has anyone used the hfsutils package? I tried the following and get an error: hfs mount ../vlc-1.1.3-intel.dmg hfsutils version 3.2.6 - Copyright (C) 1996-1998 Robert Leslie This is free software but comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. Type `license' for details. expected integer but got "../vlc-1.1.3-intel.dmg" while executing "hfs mount $path $partno"

That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$

While trying to dodge issues with case-sensitivity, I stumbled on a somewhat effective solution: the old Mac OS Hierarchical File System (HFS). HFS is case insensitive and supports symlinks, making it very useful for Wine. The drawbacks are that it's slow compared to modern file systems, the max file size is 2GB and filenames are limited to 31 bytes. It will likely have problems running

Hi list-members can anybody tell me why > pairwise.t.test(val, fac) produces an empty p-table. As shown below: Pairwise comparisons using t tests with pooled SD data: val and fac AS AT Fhh Fm Fmk Fmu GBS Gf HFS Hn jAL Kol R_Fill AT - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fhh - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fm - - - - - - -

I am seeing xend error on OpenSUSE 11.4, Has anyone else seen this ? Thanks Ranjith #uname -a Linux linux-ws7h 2.6.37.6-0.7-xen #1 SMP 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux #/var/log/xen/xend.log 2011-08-09 14:36:38 21111] ERROR (SrvDaemon:349) Exception starting xend ((111, ''Connection refused'')) Traceback (most recent call last): File

Time Machine will enable ownership on the drive the first time it starts up. The first thing it does when it creates the backup directory is to enable ownership on the drive. I've seen this happen repeatedly (it's actually the easiest way I know of to enable ownership on drive). On 2018-04-03, at 4:05 AM, Dave Gordon via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 20/03/18