similar to: zfs/acl problem samba 3.0.25a on Solaris 10 U4 (no additional patches)

On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >> >> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the >> most part they have.

I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort = dontcare , are documented. Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using NFS? If I do, where are they documented? Thanks

Hello- I upgraded Samba from 4.6 to 4.8 on a FreeBSD 11.2 server. After the upgrade, users cannot access the HOME folder share but they can access other shares just fine. I am using the RID backend on this member server that connects to Windows-based domain controllers. I apologize for the lengthy smb4.conf but here it is: #======================= Global Settings

Hi all, I'd appreciate any pointers or advise regarding the following issue with files written by M$ Office on Samba 3.0.32 on snv_98 (OpenSolaris) on a ZFS filesystem: samba share: [sharename] read only = No browseable = yes writeable = yes directory mask = 0770 create mask = 0770 delete readonly = Yes acl check permissions =

Looking to see if any one else is having this issue. Running 3.4.5 on solaris 10 with ZFS file system. When I add the vfs objects = zfsacl, Windows clients seem to fine but all my Mac OS X clients can no longer access folders on the share. They can mount the share fine but permissions are not being followed for Mac clients. "The folder "Name" could not be opened because you

> Your best bet to getting a supported (and *working*) > configuration with updated dtrace would be to upgrade > the OS. Solaris 10 update 5 is latest I reckon and > update 6 would be out real soon now. Full Ack. It''s quite difficult, though, to predict what DTrace features one will get when installing Solaris 10 (whatever release). There is nothing about the fine details of

I'm trying to use zfs acls in solaris 10. I've looked at past posts regarding this and some online help, but am stuck. I'm currently using samba 3.3.9; I've had the same problem with 3.3.7. samba is compiled and running as an Active Directory member server (compiled with ldap and kerberos). The zfs disk is local. I'm not using winbind. I compiled with zfsacl module.

Hi, I thought I should share this unusual behaiviour of samba 4.1.11. All of a sudden while I tried to delete a Folder via samba on a share it crashed. I was using Mac OSx's V 10.9.4 internal samba client (regular "CMD+K" mount via Finder). Server: [...] FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p7 #0: Tue Jul 8 06:37:44 UTC 2014 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC

hello list, after successfully playing around to get a working samba 3.0.1-PDC-LDAP-Suse9 configuration a new challenge takes place : scenario: suse9 with samba 3.0.1 as a member server in a NT4 controlled domain. winbind works as expected (thanks to documention authors). There seems to be no problem with file sharing, ACL is working properly (I'm using xfs filesystem). :-) so, now the

I'm trying to learn more about samba by experimenting with samba on FreeNAS. This involves a certain amount of reading how default smb4.conf parameters are set in FreeNAS and then reading the manpages for those parameters. Async I/O is implemented in samba in freenas via the aio_pthread VFS module. The manpage for vfs_aio_pthread states: "the smb.conf parameters aio read size and aio

Hello, I have a customer that complains about slow AD authentication when accessing the share, eventually succeed (Samba is a DC memer) In the logs I can see the following errors: [2020/02/24 14:11:16.775884,? 1] ../source3/libads/ldap_utils.c:93(ads_do_search_retry_internal) ? Reducing LDAP page size from 1000 to 500 due to IO_TIMEOUT [2020/02/24 14:11:16.775902,? 3]

Hi Rowland, do you maybe have any idea what could potentially cause this bug? smbclient thrwos me back a mount error(5): Input/output error when I try to mount the remote smbFS. It doesn't happen with my MacOSx and Windows 7 as client but it happens with Linux OSs and with a Konica Minolta copy machine with a scanner to samba function. The first try to mount fails with the above error.

Is there any way to enable both local (/etc/passwd or smbpasswd) users and users authenticated remotely by winbindd? I have a problem with samba-3.0.2a not recognizing local users at all, if winbindd is enabled (and vice versa, of course). However, I'd like to have local users take precedence over networked users, i.e. samba would let in a user, if he/she is a local one and only ask the

Hi It seems the vfs objects are not loaded. I've joined the domain with "samba-tool domain join DOMAIN DC -UAdministrator%Passwort --realm=DOMAIN.LOCAL --server=windows-dc.domain.local --use-ntvfs" The modules zfsacl.so and recycle.so exists in /usr/local/lib/shared-modules/vfs But neither the ZFS module nor the recycler works. Samba version: 4.0.13 Build host: FreeBSD

On 08. aug. 2018 22:30, Dante Colo wrote: > > If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . > I am already have 'vfs objects = zfsacl' set for my ZFS shares so acl_xattr does not help at all.

> On 02.11.2015, at 16:25, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Well he didn't write what I asked for, can you please post your entire smb.conf, please do not use testparm, please post as is (although you can sanitise any sensitive info) Sorry, missed that part. Here we go. Regards, Thomas [global] available = yes smb2 leases = yes

All, Running Samba 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 with ZFS file system. I have issues where we have shared group folders. In these folders a userA in GroupA create file just fine with the correct inherited permissions 660. Problem is when userB in GroupA reads and modifies that file, with M$ office apps, the permissions get whacked to 060+ and the file becomes read only by everyone. I did

Very well. Here is the affected smb.conf. ------ [global] server min protocol = NT1 server max protocol = SMB3 interfaces = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.8 bind interfaces only = yes encrypt passwords = yes dns proxy = no strict locking = no oplocks = yes deadtime = 15 max log size = 51200 max open files = 2830016 logging = file load printers = no

Hi, I'm running Samba Version 3.0.25c on Solaris 10 8/07 on X86 hardware. It's successfully joined to AD. But, and there always is a but, if : * A user is a member of SomeGroup * and the share alllows SomeGroup to access it * and SomeGroup is NOT what the user has set as their Primary Group in Active Directory then * Samba will recognize that the user can access the share * but,

Good morning, folks. I'm involved in a project to enforce NFSv4 ACL's across a variety of storage platforms, in particular NetApps sharing NFS. That works fiine with the NetApp NFS qtrees, but we'd like to share those with CIFS clients as well. This works, and restricts access the way we expect NFSv4 ACL's to work, but the Windows clients cannot view any of the security settings