similar to: accessing share directories

Hello I vaguely remember reading an article months ago about some fork or altnernative provider of Samba called something like Link***. The Wikipedia article on Samba only mentions TNG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samba_%28software%29 Does someone know what I'm refering to and could tell me more? Thank you.

Hi, We have had a server crash and are now unable to print from the connected pc's I have installed samba 2.2.7a and use the sysv printing system The printers are configured using HP hppi >From the unix host I can send a print to the printer I have already checked the spool directory for the printers. and the spool directory that is used by the hppi daemon. They exist. In the user log file

Hello all, Got samba with AD integration and extended ACL up and running. Here is what I am trying to do. share1 in smb.conf: [share1] comment = share1 path = /mnt/data/share1 public = no writable = yes printable = no valid users = @DOMAIN+group1 user1 and user2 are members of group1 user3 is not user1 creates

Hi, I have managed to set up a 'maildir' based mail system using fetchmail and procmail that delivers sorted mail to folders /var/spool/mail/user1, ../user2 etc. 'user1', 'user2' etc. are real users but the mail system is run under logged in user 'mailserver'. The mail folders are owned by 'user1', 'user2' etc. but mail files, when delivered, are

Hello - I upgraded from FC4 to FC6. My samba configuration (samba 3.0.1x) was working just fine until I upgraded to FC6 and Samba 3.0.24. I had shares who where protected and only some users and groups can access them. I used valid users = @wireless, where the group wireless had 10 users. Before the upgrade this was working just fine. Now nobody from @wireless group members can access the

Hi, Is this expected or not? From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> ? a uid fetch 43055 (envelope) * 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900" "test1" ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com")) ((NIL NIL "user1" "fuga.example.com"))

Hello, I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and I'm not finding a clear answer. My company currently makes a video capture and transcoding application that runs on a Linux server. The video application mounts shares from a second Linux storage server for various users at the same time. In other words, we have: A Linux Storage Server with many accounts (for example,

Hello, I have logging information for multiple machines, which I am trying to summarize and graph. So far, I process each host individually, but I would like to summarize the user count across multiple hosts. I want to answer the question "how many unique users logged in on a certain day across a group of machines"? I'm not quite sure how to scale the data frame and analysis to

PBX: Asterisk 1.4 Phones: PSTN phone connected to TDM400 X-Ten Lite Polycom 430 Scenario Polycom 430 = User1 User2 calls User1(Polycom 430) asks to be transfered to User3 User1 does an attended transfer using the trnsfr button on the polycom User2 is placed in music-on-hold User3s phone rings. (So far so good Right?) User3 picks up the phone to answer User2 only to

I have a dataset like this (dput for this below) which represents user computer sessions: username machine start end 1 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:44:18 2011-01-03 09:47:27 2 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 09:46:29 2011-01-03 10:09:16 3 user1 D5599.domain.com 2011-01-03 14:07:36 2011-01-03 14:56:17 4 user1 D5599.domain.com

hey list, we are currently migrating our users from novell to samba. now we have one problem: in novell we could give e.g. user1 access to users2 home share so he could modify, delete or add files on this share. in samba we defined a global homes share that is mapped on logon. so how can we give user1 the needed rights? here is the definition of the homes share in smb.conf: [homes]

Hi all, I do have a mailbox-quota problem in dovecot 2.0.19 that is beond my understanding. Could someone pls. give me a hint. - user1 max. mailbox quota is set to 1GB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 15MB - user2 max. mailbox quota is set to 10MB, the current mailbox size of user1 is 10kB - user1 shares the folder 'shared_folder' to user2 with all rights (read, write ...) -

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20091030/c43a29f5/attachment.html>

Basically, what I typed was: chown -R user2:user2 * chown -R user2:user2 .* chown -R user2:user2 *.* ...all in /home. Duh. I forgot which way recursive went. So, I then did: chown -R root:root * chown -R root:root .* chown -R root:root *.* ...this time in / to try and f things. Duh again. Other items need to have other owners & groups. So, how can I fix this? In MacOSX, there is a utility

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

Hey list, I have a problem when I host 2 SIP-accounts on the same Asterisk-server. Asterisk picks out the SIP-account on alphabetic order A --> Z. In my sip.conf : register => user1:passwd1 at server/user1 register => user2:passwd2 at server/user2 [YOCAN-3starsnet] type=peer host=server username=user1 secret=passwd1 fromuser=user1 accountcode=user1_in [ITCENTER-3starsnet] type=peer

On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com> wrote: > On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi <tachibana at qualitia.co.jp> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is this expected or not? >> >> From: user1 at fuga.example.com <user1 at example.com> >> To: user2 at hoge.example.com <user2 at example.com> >>

Hello I noticed a small bug in the way my extensions.conf work: Users can choose extensions 1-4 or 9 to tell why they're calling, and I'll send an e-mail to the person(s) to whom is involved. Extension 4 is actually for personal messages for User1, and extension 9 is for everyone (User1, User2, and User3). => For some reason, when the caller chooses extension 4, both User1 and User2

On 02/06/2017 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:11:09 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. >> > >> And the nss tests as per Wiki seem to pass: >> > >> >> # getent passwd Administrator >>

Hi List :) So, I have a folder1, its owner is user1 who has r+w on the folder. User2 is the group owner who only has read access (when I say user2, I mean the group called user2, because when you make a new user the OS can make them their own group). You can see these permissions below: [user2 at host test]$ ls -l drw-r----- 3 user1 user2 28 Nov 2 16:17 folder1 How ever user2 can not